Mohammed O Alshehri¹*, Wael A Alsaleh², Munira Mohammed Al-Abdulwahab³, Abeer Othman Andarawi², Kawakeb Mohammed Daraj³, Fatimah Rada Alsammak⁴ and Saad Khaleel Alonze⁵

¹Obstetrics and Gynecology Consultant, Head of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Maternity Hospital, Riyadh First Cluster, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
²Obstetrics and Gynecology Associate Consultant, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Maternity Hospital, Riyadh First Cluster, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
³Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Sulaiman Al-Habib Medical Group, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
⁴Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Fahad University Hospital, Al Kobar City, Saudi Arabia
⁵Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Maternity Hospital, Riyadh First Cluster, King Saud medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author: Mohammed O Alshehri, Obstetrics and Gynecology Consultant, Head of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Maternity Hospital, Riyadh First Cluster, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Received: April 16, 2025; Published: May 08, 2025

Abstract

The morphometric measurements (Birth Body Length, Birth Body Weight, Head Circumference, and Abdominal Circumference) are irreplaceable in general health assessments and the nutritional condition of newborn babies. Many defined and undefined internal and external factors significantly affect the neonates' bodyweight and birth length. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the impact of the time span of 17 years on the body length and weight of newborns, the average age of the mother and the number of births.

Birth Body Length and Birth Body Weight were measured in 214 neonates from Kosovo in two different timelines: 105 neonates born in 2001 and 109 neonates born in 2018. The obtained data were analyzed through descriptive parameters, T-test, and Canonical Discriminant Analysis.

According to the canonical discriminative analysis data, it can be concluded that in 2018 women older gave birth to children with greater body length and weight, compared to 2001 when younger women gave birth to children with smaller body length and body weight.

Among many defined and undefined factors, the difficult socio-economic situation in afterwar Kosovo (2001) has been the main factor for the smaller morphometric dimensions of the children born this period than the children born in 2018.>

Keywords: Neonates; Birth Body Length; Birth Body Weight

References

1. Zhang S., et al. “Cervical cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors and screening”. Chinese Journal of Cancer Research6 (2020): 720-708.
2. Maver PJ and Poljak M. “Primary HPV-based cervical cancer screening in Europe: implementation status, challenges, and future plans”. Clinical Microbiology Infection5 (2020): 579-583.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Cervical cancer statistics”. (2022).
4. World Health Organization. “WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention”. (2021).
5. Stumbar SE., et al. “Cervical cancer and its precursors”. Prime Care1 (2019): 117-134.
6. Basak H., et al. “Cervical cytology classification using PCA and GWO enhanced deep features selection”. SN Computer Sciences5 (2021): 369.
7. Huang J., et al. “Nucleus segmentation of cervical cytology images based on multi-scale fuzzy clustering algorithm”. Bioengineered1 (2020): 484-501.
8. Fekri-Ershad S. “Pap smear classification using combination of global significant value, texture statistical features and time series features”. Multimedia Tools and Applications 22 (2019): 31121-31136.
9. Javed AR., et al. “A collaborative healthcare framework for shared healthcare plan with ambient intelligence”. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences1 (2020): 40.
10. Alsubai S., et al. “Privacy preserved cervical cancer detection using convolutional neural networks applied to Pap smear images”. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 1 (2020).
11. Chowdary GJ., et al. “Nucleus segmentation and classification using residual SE-UNet and feature concatenation approach in cervical cytopathology cell images”. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment 22 (2023).
12. Tan SL., et al. “Cervical cancer classification from Pap smear images using deep convolutional neural network models". Interdisciplinary Sciences1 (2024): 16-38.
13. Wong OGW., et al. “Machine learning interpretation of extended human papillomavirus genotyping by Onclarity in an Asian cervical cancer screening population”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology12 (2019).
14. Mabeya H., et al. “Comparison of conventional cervical cytology versus visual inspection with acetic acid among human immunodeficiency virus-infected women in Western Kenya”. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease 2 (2012): 92-97.
15. Mehta V., et al. “Pap smear”. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology2 (2009): 214.
16. Monsonego J., et al. “Prevalence of high-risk human papilloma virus genotypes and associated risk of cervical precancerous lesions in a large U.S. screening population: data from the ATHENA trial”. Gynecologic Oncology1 (2015): 47-54.
17. Schiffman M., et al. “A study of genotyping for management of human papillomavirus-positive, cytology-negative cervical screening results”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology1 (2015): 52-59.
18. Chaturvedi AK., et al. “Human papillomavirus infection with multiple types: pattern of coinfection and risk of cervical disease”. Journal of Infectious Disease7 (2011): 910-920.
19. Carrillo-García A., et al. “Impact of human papillomavirus coinfections on the risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and cervical cancer”. Gynecologic Oncology3 (2014): 534-539.
20. Nogueira Dias Genta ML., et al. “Multiple HPV genotype infection impact on invasive cervical cancer presentation and survival”. PLoS One8 (2017): e0182854.
21. Okadome M., et al. “Potential impact of combined high- and low-risk human papillomavirus infection on the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2”. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2 (2014): 561-569.
22. Andersson E., et al. “Type-dependent E6/E7 mRNA expression of single and multiple high-risk human papillomavirus infections in cervical neoplasia”. Journal of Clinical Virology1 (2012): 61-65.

Citation

Citation: Mohammed O Alshehri., et al. “Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Methods in the Diagnosis and Screening of Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 9.6 (2025): 24-29.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Mohammed O Alshehri., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.