Mohammed Abdulrahman Alquraya*, Omar Khalid Alkhaldi, Abdulrahman Mohammed Aljwaied, Osama Abdulmajeed AlZahrani, Khalid Saeed Alshahrani, Sultan Hamad Alajmi, Mohammed Thiban Alghamdi, Mohammed Mudhhi Albaqami, Omar Faisal Alharbi and Osama Mudhhi Alshehri

Respiratory Therapy Specialist, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author: Mohammed Abdulrahman Alquraya, Respiratory Therapy Specialist, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Received: July 16, 2024; Published: August 07, 2024

Abstract

Background: Positive pressure ventilation with a face mask or nasal prongs is advised at birth according to the most recent guidelines for neonatal resuscitation. Newborn infant outcomes could be enhanced by the use of a nasal interface. The purpose of this systematic review study was to ascertain how various PPV techniques affected infant resuscitation and how the rate of BPD decreased.

Method: This systematic review was conducted in accordance to PRISMA guidlines. We searched MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EMBASE online databases. In addition, we manually searched the references in the articles that our search strategy had turned up. Only publications published between 2005 and 2023 in the English language were included.

Results: In this systematic review study we included 7 RCTs, with a total of 1735 participants. Four of the studies compared SLI with conventional care. Three studies compared face mask with single nasal prongs, Nasal cannula and nasal tube. Face mask is not superior either to SNP or nasal tube in providing PPV during neonatal resuscitation. Nasal cannula was found to be more effective in oxygen delivery during neonatal resuscitation when compared to oral route. According to 2 of the included studies there is no significant benefits after the use of sustained lung infaltion in the resuscitation.

Conclusion: Nasal cannula was more effective in oxygen delivery during neonatal resuscitation when compared to oral route. treatment failure less occured in sustained-pressure controlled ventilation compared to intermittent mandatory ventilation.

 Keywords: Neonatal Resuscitation; Positive Pressure Ventilation; Delivery Room; Preterm Infants

References

1. Perlman JM., et al. “Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the delivery room: associated clinical events”. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine1 (1995): 20-25.
2. Perlman JM., et al. “Neonatal Resuscitation Chapter Collaborators. Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations”. Pediatrics5 (2010): e1319-1344.
3. O’Donnell CP., et al. “Neonatal resuscitation 2: an evaluation of manual ventilation devices and face masks”. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition5 (2005): F392-F396.
4. Schmölzer GM., et al. “Airway obstruction and gas leak during mask ventilation of preterm infants in the delivery room”. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition4 (2011): F254-F257.
5. chmölzer GM., et al. “Respiratory function monitor guidance of mask ventilation in the delivery room: a feasibility study”. Journal of Pediatrics3 (2012): 377-381.
6. Aly H., et al. “Is it safer to intubate premature infants in the delivery room?” Pediatrics 6 (2005): 1660-1665.
7. Schmolzer GM., et al. “Reducing lung injury during neonatal resuscitation of preterm infants”. Journal of Pediatrics6 (2008): 741-745.
8. Van Marter LJ., et al. “Do clinical markers of barotrauma and oxygen toxicity explain interhospital variation in rates of chronic lung disease? The Neonatology Committee for the Developmental Network”. Pediatrics 105 (2000): 1194-1201.
9. Greenough A. “Update on modalities of mechanical ventilators”. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 87 (2002): F3-F6.
10. Ingimarsson J., et al. “Incomplete protection by prophylactic surfactant against the adverse effects of large lung inflations at birth in immature lambs”. Intensive Care Medicine 30 (2004): 1446-1453.
11. Bjorklund LJ., et al. “Lung recruitment at birth does not improve lung function in immature lambs receiving surfactant”. Acta Anaesthesiology Scand 45 (2001): 986-993.
12. te Pas AB., et al. “A randomized, controlled trial of delivery-room respiratory management in very preterm infants”. Pediatrics 120 (2007): 322-329.
13. Harling AE., et al. “Does sustained lung inflation at resuscitation reduce lung injury in the preterm infant?”. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition5 (2005): F406-F410.
14. Lindner W., et al. “Delivery room management of extremely low birth weight infants: spontaneous breathing or intubation?” Pediatrics5 pt 1 (1999): 961-967.
15. Lista G., et al. “SLI Trial Investigators. Sustained lung inflation at birth for preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial”. Pediatrics 2 (2015): e457-64.
16. McCarthy LK., et al. “A randomized trial of nasal prong or face mask for respiratory support for preterm newborns”. Pediatrics 132 (2013): e389-395.
17. Capasso L., et al. “A randomized trial comparing oxygen delivery on intermittent positive pressure with nasal cannulae versus facial mask in neonatal primary resuscitation”. Acta Paediatrics 94 (2005): 197-200.
18. Kamlin CO., et al. “Mask versus nasal tube for stabilization of preterm infants at birth: a randomized controlled trial”. Pediatrics 132 (2013): e381-388.
19. Lindner W., et al. “Sustained pressure-controlled inflation or intermittent mandatory ventilation in preterm infants in the delivery room? A randomized, controlled trial on initial respiratory support via nasopharyngeal tube”. Acta Paediatrics3 (2005): 303-309.
20. te Pas AB and Walther FJ. A randomized, controlled trial of delivery-room respiratory management in very preterm infants”. Pediatrics2 (2007): 322-329.
21. Berry D., et al. “Distribution of pulmonary blood flow in relation to atelectasis in premature ventilated lambs”. American Review of Respiratory Disease3 (1985): 500-503.
22. Klingenberg C., et al. “Effect of sustained inflation duration; resuscitation of near-term asphyxiated lambs”. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition3 (2013): F222-F227.
23. te Pas AB., et al. “Establishing functional residual capacity at birth: the effect of sustained inflation and positive end-expiratory pressure in a preterm rabbit model”. Pediatric Research5 (2009): 537-541.

Citation

Citation: Mohammed Abdulrahman Alquraya., et al. “Effectiveness and Impact of Different Positive Pressure Ventilation Techniques on Neonatal Resuscitation and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia; Systematic Review”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 8.9 (2024): 33-38.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Mohammed Abdulrahman Alquraya., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.