Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 8

Assessment of the Patient’s Satisfaction Regarding Pain Management at the Emergency Department in King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Abeer Ghawnni*, Nouf Alrushid, Ola Alabdullatif and Areej Alnughaimshi

Department of Emergency Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author: Abeer Ghawnni, Department of Emergency Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Received: June 27, 2023; Published: July 05, 2023

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction is a vital measure of the quality of care in the emergency department (ED). Furthermore, positive patient experiences are affected by efficient communication with healthcare providers, their empathetic nature, and effective pain management.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the patient’s satisfaction in the ED regarding pain management at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Riyadh.

Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted among patients who visited the ED for pain management reasons from January 2023 to May 2023. The data collection tool was self-structured and included questions assessing patients’ demographic characteristics and satisfaction with pain management practices in the ED using a 5-point Likert scale.

Results: The study included 201 patients who attended the ED throughout the study period and had the willingness to participate. The median (IQR) age was 40 (28) years. Most of the patients were females (59.8%), Saudi nationals (92%), and the most common educational level was a university degree or higher (47.3%). The most common pain location among patients was abdominal pain (20.8%), and the most common pain type was acute pain (55.7%). About two-thirds of patients (62.7%) received analgesics for pain control, and non-opioid analgesics were the most prescribed (35.1%). There was a significant correlation between the severity of pain before and after receiving the analgesic and patients' satisfaction with care quality (p-value= 0.18 and 0.001, respectively). Patients who agreed that the ED staff adequately assessed their pain, received the analgesic promptly, adequately responded to their pain, had good communication with ED nurses and physicians, received adequate information about their illness, had their pain taken seriously, and were satisfied with the treatment they received for pain. Those patients were significantly more likely to report high levels of satisfaction with their overall quality of care in the ED (P < 0.001 for all factors).

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that most patients reported high levels of satisfaction with pain management practices in the ED. Most patients reported adequate pain assessment, satisfactory communication with healthcare providers, and satisfaction with their pain treatment. Conversely, a small percentage reported a negative opinion about the quality of care in the ED. Pain severity before and after receiving analgesics was associated with patients’ satisfaction with the care quality.

 Keywords: Pain; Emergency Department; Saudi Arabia

References

  1. Purser L., et al. “Making pain visible: an audit and review of documentation to improve the use of pain assessment by implementing pain as the fifth vital sign”. Pain Management Nursing1 (2014): 137-142.
  2. Cordell WH., et al. “The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care”. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine3 (2002): 165-169.
  3. Abou-Setta AM., et al. “Pain management interventions for hip fracture”.
  4. Wilsey B., et al. “Pain management in the ED”. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine1 (2004): 51-57.
  5. Berben SA., et al. “Pain prevalence and pain relief in trauma patients in the Accident & Emergency department”. Injury5 (2008): 578-585.
  6. Pierik JG., et al. “Pain management in the emergency chain: the use and effectiveness of pain management in patients with acute musculoskeletal pain”. Pain Medicine5 (2015): 970-984.
  7. Jao K., et al. “Simple clinical targets associated with a high level of patient satisfaction with their pain management”. Emergency Medicine Australasia2 (2011): 195-201.
  8. Blank FS., et al. “Adequacy of pain assessment and pain relief and correlation of patient satisfaction in 68 ED fast-track patients”. Journal of Emergency Nursing4 (2001): 327-34.
  9. Vickers NJ. “Animal communication: when I'm calling you, will you answer too?” Current Biology14 (2017): R713-715.
  10. Abolfotouh MA., et al. “Predictors of patient satisfaction in an emergency care center in central Saudi Arabia: a prospective study”. Emergency Medicine Journal1 (2017): 27-33.
  11. Almass A., et al. “Patient Satisfaction With Quality of Care at the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”. Cureus 12 (2022).
  12. Bakhsh H., et al. “Patient satisfaction with acute pain management for the opioid naive population in a Saudi emergency department”. Saudi Journal of Emergency Medicine2 (2020): 89.
  13. Todd KH., et al. “Pain in the emergency department: results of the pain and emergency medicine initiative (PEMI) multicenter study”. The Journal of Pain6 (2007): 460-466.
  14. Campbell SM., et al. “Defining quality of care”. Social Science and Medicine11 (2000): 1611-1625.
  15. Gan TJ., et al. “Incidence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of post-surgical pain: results from a US national survey”. Current Medical Research and Opinion1 (2014): 149-160.
  16. Abbas G., et al. “Patient satisfaction with the emergency department services at an academic teaching hospital”. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care4 (2021): 1718.
  17. Jao K., et al. “Simple clinical targets associated with a high level of patient satisfaction with their pain management”. Emergency Medicine Australasia2 (2011): 195-201.
  18. Boudreaux ED., et al. “Predictors of emergency department patient satisfaction: stability over 17 months”. Academic Emergency Medicine1 (2004): 51-58.
  19. Fallon E., et al. “Predictors of patient satisfaction with pain management in the emergency department”. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal2 (2016): 115-122.
  20. Shirley ED and Sanders JO. “Patient satisfaction: implications and predictors of success”. JBJS 10 (2013): e69.
  21. Surani A., et al. “The Impact of Dynamic Real-Time Feedback on Patient Satisfaction Scores”. Journal of General Internal Medicine2 (2023): 361-365.

Citation

Citation: Abeer Ghawnni., et al. “Assessment of the Patient’s Satisfaction Regarding Pain Management at the Emergency Department in King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 7.8 (2023): 33-41.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Abeer Ghawnni., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is April 30th, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue".
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US