Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 3

Dosimetric Comparison of Electron Cutout Measurement for Breast Cancer Boost Versus RadCal Dosimetry in Radiation Therapy

Huda I Al-Mohammed*

Radiological Sciences Department, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author: Huda I Al-Mohammed, Radiological Sciences Department, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Received: January 25, 2023; Published: February 02, 2023

Abstract

External radiation therapy treatment with electron boost for the chest wall is the treatment protocol for breast cancer after mastectomy with positive axillary lymph nodes. followed by a local electron boost to the local lymph nodes with a total dose of 10 Gy. Outstanding locoregional control was shown in the majority of patients treated with this strategy, with a 3-year survival rate of 90% and a 5-year survival rate of 87%, and a 3-year survival rate of 61% and a 5-year survival rate of 47% without distant metastases.

Purpose and Objective(s): The study's objective is to compare the computed monitor units with RadCal software dosimetry in order to evaluate the monitor unit of electron cutout boost for treatments of the chest wall following the external beam radiation therapy.

Material/Methods: 15 patients with mastectomy, aged range from 35 to 75 years. They all went for a single electron boost field with dose of 10 Gy using 12 MeV beam. Then the delivered dose MU were compared with RadCal software dosimetry.

Results: The result showed no statistically significant difference between the MU measured with electron filed and the calculated MU with the RadCalc software dosimetry. The excellent result outcome achieved with electron cutout with comparison with the RadCal and found to be statistically significant (P = 0.025).

Conclusions: The result showed a assess the monitor unit of electron cutout for treatments in chest wall irradiation after mastectomy boost in external beam radiation therapy in comparison with the calculated monitor units with RadCalc software dosimetry.

Keywords: Breast Cancer; Axillary Node; Electron Beam; Electron Cutout; RadCal; Radiation Therapy

References

  1. Jennifer Y Turner., et al. “Technique and outcome of post-mastectomy adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy—the role of tissue-equivalent bolus in reducing risk of local recurrence”. British Journal of Radiology1064 (2016): 20160060.
  2. Mary Jo Wright. “Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer”. Annals of Medicine and Surgery 56 (2020): 95-107.
  3. Bruce J., et al. “Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: Supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25”. Medical Physics Journal. 36 (2009): 3239-3279.
  4. Hehr T., et al. “Postmastectomy electron-beam-rotation irradiation in locally advanced breast cancer prognostic factors of locoregional tumor control”. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie11 (2002) :624-632.
  5. Damast S., et al. “Locoregional outcomes of inflammatory breast cancer patients treated with standard fractionation radiation and daily skin bolus in the taxane era”. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 77 (2010): 1105-1112.
  6. Shin-Hyung Park and Jae-Chul Kim. “Comparison of Electron and X-Ray Beams for Tumor Bed Boost Irradiation in Breast-Conserving Treatment”. Journal of Breast Cancer 16 (2013): 300-307.
  7. Lawrence SL., et al. “Assessment of Eclipse electron Monte Carlo output prediction for various topologies”. The Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 3 (2015): 5036.
  8. Yu Murakami., et al. “Dosimetric comparison between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy followed by electron beam boost and volumetric modulated arc therapy using concomitant boost for the heart and cardiac segments in patients with left-sided breast cancer at risk for radiation-induced cardiac toxicity”. Journal of Medical Physics 95 (2022): 126-132.
  9. Ayat M Saadeldina and Azhar M Elwanb. “Characterization of irregular electron beam for boost dose after whole breast irradiation”. Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy 2 (2020): 168-173.
  10. FM Khan., et al. “Clinical electronbeam dosimetry: Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 25”. Medical Physics Journal 18 (1991): 73-109.

Citation

Citation: Huda I Al-Mohammed. “Dosimetric Comparison of Electron Cutout Measurement for Breast Cancer Boost Versus RadCal Dosimetry in Radiation Therapy”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 7.3 (2023): 20-23.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Huda I Al-Mohammed. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is July 30, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US