Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 8

Genetic Polymorphism Can Play a Major Role in Distance Preference by Elite Stayers

IR Mavlyanov, AKh Ashirmetov, NM Rakhimova* and ST Yulchiev

Republican Scientific and Practical Center of Sports Medicine at the National Olympic Committee of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan

*Corresponding Author: NM Rakhimova, Republican Scientific and Practical Center of Sports Medicine at the National Olympic Committee of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan.

Received: June 08, 2022; Published: July 15, 2022


This study assessed the association between elite track and field athletes' preference for distance running and variants of 10 genes previously associated with an individual's endurance, power or strength status.

Athletes were divided into 3 groups according to preference for short (0.8 and 1.5 km), medium (1.5 - 21.1 km) and long (21.1 and 41.1 km) distances. The study analyzed the frequency of detection of the corresponding alleles and the " total genotype score" (TGS) of such genes as: ACE I/D, ACTN3 C/T, AMPD1 C/T, PPARA G/C, PPARG2 C/G, MTHFR A/C, HIF1A C/T, ADRB2 C>G, ADRB2 G>A, NOS3 C/T, relative to non-athletes.

It was found that the frequency of alleles in terms of power and strength, as well as TGS in elite stayers who prefer short distances, were higher than in marathon runners and the control group. The same indicators regarding endurance showed the opposite picture. Alleles of the NOS3 and ACTN3 genes were noted as promising genetic markers for all stayers, and for marathon runners AMPD1 as well and HIF1A as the allele of endurance. Whereas, for middle-distance runners, the power allele PPARA was added, and for athletes who prefer short distances, PPARA, MTHFR and ACE were also added.

Keywords: Sports Genetics; Elite Athletes; Genetic Polymorphism; Running Distance; Endurance; Power; Strength; Marathon


  1. Gineviciene V., et al. “Perspectives in Sports Genomics”. Biomedicines2 (2022): 298.
  2. John R., et al. “Genetics and the Elite Athlete: Our Understanding in 2020”. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics3 (2020): 256-263.
  3. Mavlyanov IR and Ashirmetov AКh. “Prospects of molecular genetics in sports medicine”. Journal of Diseases1 (2016): 8-15.
  4. Ghosh A and Mahajan PB. “Can genotype determine the sports phenotype? A paradigm shift in sports medicine”. The Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology 27.333 (2016):
  5. Sellami M., et al. “Molecular Big Data in Sports Sciences: State-of-Art and Future Prospects of OMICS-Based Sports Sciences”. Frontiers in Molecular Bioscience 8 (2021): 815410.
  6. Appel M., et al. “Effects of Genetic Variation on Endurance Performance, Muscle Strength, and Injury Susceptibility in Sports: A Systematic Review”. Frontiers in Physiology 12 (2021): 694411.
  7. Akhmetov II., et al. “Advances in sports genomics”. Advances in Clinical Chemistry (2021).
  8. Naureen Z., et al. “Genetic test for the personalization of sport training”. Acta Biomedicine13 (2020): e2020012.
  9. Alvarez-Romero J., et al. “Mapping Robust Genetic Variants Associated with Exercise Responses”. International Journal of Sports Medicine 1 (2021): 3-18.
  10. Mavlyanov IR., et al. “Problems and prospects of development of sports medicine”. Asian Journal of Research3 (2017): 61-89.
  11. Haugen T., et al. “The training and development of elite Sprint performance: an integration of scientific and best practice literature”. Sports Medicine Open 1 (2019): 44.
  12. Dawson EA., et al. “Intra‐individual differences in the effect of endurance versus resistance training on vascular function: A cross‐over study”. Scandinavian Journal of Medical Science and Sports8 (2021): 1683-1692.
  13. Silva H-H., et al. “Genomic profile in association with sport-type, sex, ethnicity, psychological traits and sport injuries of elite athletes”. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness3 (2022): 418-434.
  14. Williams AG., et al. “Similarity of polygenic profiles limits the potential for elite human physical performance”. Journal of Physiology 586 (2008): 113-121.
  15. Fuku N., et al. “Genetics of muscle fiber composition”. in: D. Barh, I. Ahmetov (Eds.), Sports, Exercise, and Nutritional Genomics: Current Status and Future Directions, Academic Press, USA, (2019): 295-314.
  16. Miyamoto-Mikami ., et al. “Heritability estimates of endurance-related phenotypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Scandinavian Journal of Medical Science and Sports 28 (2018): 834-845.
  17. Hall E., et al. “Prediction of muscle fiber composition using multiple repetition testing”. Biological and Sport 38 (2021): 277-283.
  18. Suga T., et al. “Calcaneus height is a key morphological factor of sprint performance in sprinters”. Scientific Reports 10 (2020): 15425.
  19. Zempo H., et al. “Heritability estimates of muscle strength-related phenotypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Scandinavian Journal of Medical Science and Sports 27 (2017): 1537-1546.
  20. Balberova OV., et al. “Candidate Genes of Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Energy Metabolism in Athletes”. Genes (Basel)11 (2021): 1682.
  21. , et al. “Global gene expression in skeletal muscle from well-trained strength and endurance athletes”. Medical Sciences and Sports Exercises 41 (2009): 546-565.
  22. Gronek P., et al. “Polygenic Study of Endurance‐Associated Genetic Markers NOS3 (Glu298Asp), BDKRB2 (‐9/+9), UCP2 (Ala55Val), AMPD1 (Gln45Ter) and ACE (I/D) in Polish Male Half Marathoners”. Journal of Human Kinetetics 64 (2018): 87-98.
  23. Ipekoglu G., et al. “A meta-analysis on the association of ACE and PPARA gene variants and endurance athletic status”. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness (2021).
  24. Delgado DV., et al. “Genotype scores in energy and iron-metabolising genes are higher in elite endurance athletes than in nonathlete controls. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism11 (2020): 1225-1231.
  25. Moir HJ., et al. “Genes and Elite Marathon Running Performance: A Systematic Review”. Journal of Sports and Science Medicine 3 (2019): 559-568.
  26. Dinç N., et al. “The effect of the MTHFR C677T mutation on athletic performance and the homocysteine level of soccer players and sedentary individuals”. Journal of Human Kinetics 51 (2016): 61-69.
  27. Tsianos GI., et al. “Associations of polymorphisms of eight muscle-or metabolism-related genes with performance in Mount Olympus marathon runners”. Journal of Applied Physiology3 (2010): 567-574.
  28. Pranckeviciene E., et al. “Total Genotype Score Modelling of Polygenic Endurance-Power Profiles in Lithuanian Elite Athletes”. Genes (Basel)7 (2021): 1067.
  29. Gibson OR., et al. “Heat alleviation strategies for athletic performance: A review and practitioner guidelines”. Temperature (Austin)1 (2020): 3-36.
  30. Wilber RL and Pitsiladis YP. “Kenyan and Ethiopian distance runners: what makes them so good?” The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 2 (2012): 92-102.
  31. Ash GI., et al. “No association between ACE gene variation and endurance athlete status in Ethiopians. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 4 (2011): 590-597.
  32. Gajda R., et al. “To Be a Champion of the 24-h Ultramarathon Race. If Not the Heart Mosaic Theory?” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 5 (2021): 2371.


Citation: NM Rakhimova., et al. “Genetic Polymorphism Can Play a Major Role in Distance Preference by Elite Stayers”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 6.8 (2022): 71-78.


Copyright: © 2022 NM Rakhimova., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In

News and Events

Contact US