Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 1

Radiographical Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Resorption under Fixed Dental Bridge - Part II

Jabbar Hussein Kamel1 and Faraed Dawood Salman2*

1Professor in Conservative Dentistry, Head of Conservative Department, Tishik University, Erbil, Iraq
2Professor in Department of Dental Assistant, Medical Technical Institute, Erbil Polytechnique University, Erbil, Iraq

*Corresponding Author: Faraed Dawood Salman, Professor in Department of Dental Assistant, Medical Technical Institute, Erbil Polytechnique University, Erbil, Iraq.

Received: October 21, 2021; Published: December 08, 2021

Abstract

Aims of the Study: Were evaluation of Alveolar Bone Resorption (ABR) under the fixed dental bridge (FDB) radiographically, along with considering the impact of variations like duration, the number of pontics, and the number of abutments, elaborating and expanding more about these variations.

Materials and Methods: Forty (FDBs) were included from participants attending oral diagnosis and radiology department (Dentistry department)/Tishik International University. Each (FDB) was evaluated for the duration, the number of pontics, and the number of abutments.

The orthopantomograph (OPG) was chosen as a radiographic technique to evaluate the (ABR), and measurements were done by the NewTom program.

Results: Revealed highly significant associated level of (ABR) under (FDB) alongside duration and number of pontics, while the number of abutments was found to play an insignificant vital role in ABR.

Conclusion: FDB in conjunction with both variables (increasing number of pontics and duration more than five years) induce ABR, while the number of abutments does not considerably affect ABR.

Keywords: Pontic; Abutment; Alveolar Bone Resorption (ABR); Fixed Dental Bridge (FDB)

References

  1. Rosenstiel SF., et al. “Contemporary fixed orthodontics (4th Edition)”. St. Louis: Mosby (2006).
  2. Mitchell David and Laura. “Oxford Handbook of Clinical Dentistry”. Oxford (2016).
  3. Mitchell DA., et al. “Oxford Handbook of Clinical Dentistry (Sixth Edition)”. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2014): 268.
  4. KC Basnyat S., et al. “Oral hygiene and gingival health in patients with fixed prosthodontic Appliances-A six month follow-up”. Kathmandu University Medical Journal52 (2015): 328-332.
  5. Ottoman SM., et al. “Oral hygiene and gingival health in patients with fixed prosthodontic Appliances-A 12-month follow-up”. Colloegium Antropologicum1 (2012): 213-220.
  6. Maglad AS., et al. “Risk Management in Clinical Practice. Part 3. Crowns and Bridges”. British Dental Journal3 (2010): 115.
  7. Lulic M., et al. “Ante’s (1926) law revisited: a systematic review on survival rates and complications of fixed dental prostheses (FDPS) on severely reduced periodontal tissue support”. Clinical and Implants Research3 (2007): 63-72.
  8. Rosensteil SF and Land MF. “Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics-E-Book”. Elsevier Health Science Ps 67 (2015): 786.
  9. Chandrakala V., et al. “Different Classification System for Failures in tooth supported fixed partial denture: a systematic review”. International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research 6 (2019): 17-19.
  10. Knoernschild KL and Campbell SD. “Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 84 (2000): 492-489.
  11. Wyatt CC. “The effect of prosthodontic treatment on alveolar bone loss: a review of the literature”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 80 (1998): 362-366.
  12. Human S and Lindhe J. “A longitudinal study of combined periodontal and prosthetic treatment of patients with advanced periodontal disease”. Journal of Periodontology 50 (1979): 163-169.
  13. ValderhauGW J and Birkeland J. “Periodontal Conditions in patients 5 years following insertion of fixed prosthesis: pocket depth and loss of attachment”. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 3 (1976): 237-243.
  14. Smaller I., et al. “Five-year clinical results of zirconia frames for posterior fixed partial dentures”. International Journal of Prosthodontics 20 (2007): 383.
  15. Swartz B., et al. “Longterm changes in marginal and periapical periodontal conditions in patients with fixed prostheses. A radiographic study”. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 23 (1996): 101-107.
  16. ShillinGburg HT., et al. “Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics”. Quintessence Publishing Company (1997): 158-160.
  17. Briggs P., et al. “Avoiding and managing the failure of conventional crowns and bridges”. Dental Update 39 (2012): 78-84.
  18. Yang HS., et al. “Finite element stress analysis on the effects of splinting in fixed partial dentures”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 81 (1999): 721-728.
  19. Zhang Y., et al. “Effect of double abutment absorption of alveolar bone in rigid fixed bridge on the stress distribution of abutments”. Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry (2012): 3.
  20. Moses P., et al. “Maintenance of periodontal attachment levels in prosthetically treated patients with gingivitis or moderate chronic periodontitis 5-17 years post therapy”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 29 (2002): 531-539.
  21. Hammer’s CH. “Success and failure of fixed bridgework”. Periodontology 4 (2002): 41-51.
  22. Nyman S and Ericsson I. “The capacity of reduced periodontal tissues to support fixed bridgework”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 9 (1982): 409-414.
  23. Jabbar Hussein Kamel and Faraed Dawood Salman. “Radiographical Evaluation of Bone Resorption around Fixed Prosthesis”. Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 6 (2020).

Citation

Citation: Jabbar Hussein Kamel and Faraed Dawood Salman. “Radiographical Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Resorption under Fixed Dental Bridge - Part II”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 6.1 (2022): 72-77.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Jabbar Hussein Kamel and Faraed Dawood Salman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





Contact US