Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 8

Testing and Validation of the Questionnaire Identification of Professional Stress Syndrome in Health Workers (IPSSHM)

Cătălina Croitoru1, Vlada Furdui2, Ana Leorda2, Anatolie Baciu2, Olga Bulat2, Ludmila Ursu2, Vasile Dumitraș1 and Elena Ciobanu1*

1Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Republic of Moldova
2Institute of Physiology and Sanocreatology, Republic of Moldova

*Corresponding Author: Elena Ciobanu, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Republic of Moldova.

Received: July 16, 2021; Published: July 22, 2021

Abstract

Introduction: Burnout is a common problem, especially in people whose professional activity is associated with communication with other people. At the WHO European Conference, it was mentioned that work-related stress is a significant problem for about a third of people in European Union countries.

Materials and Methods: A descriptive study was performed. Specialty scientific papers on the indicators that reflect the stress and burnout were consulted for the elaboration of the working tool (IPSSHM questionnaire - for diagnosing the professional stress syndrome in the health workers) and selecting the testing methodology.

Results: A questionnaire, which includes two parts (general and special), was elaborated. The general part of the questionnaire (with ten items) allowed to collect personal social, professional, and married data about the respondent, regarding age, biological gender, family situation, living environment, activity environment, medical specialty, place/work institution, work experience, and information about a part-time job. The unique part of the questionnaire represents a set of 131 items, which characterize the respondent through the prism of six distinctive structural blocks: emotional-sentimental, behavioral block, cognitive block, communicative block, individual-semantic block, and neurophysiological block. The questions in the questionnaire were randomly ordered. The respondent selected the pre-set answers: Yes, No, I didn't think/Differently. Each answer receives a score from 1 to 3, depending on the peculiarity of the question and block belonging. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.71. The results of the elaborated instrument were compared with the results of two standardized questionnaires (Maslach and Eysenck), which were conducted in parallel.

Conclusion: The obtained results demonstrate the validity of the questionnaire and the possibility of its application identifying health workers' burnout.

Keywords: Questionnaire; Validation; Doctors; Stress; Burnout; Health

References

  1. Fontes FF and Herbert J. “Freudenberger e a constituição do burnout como síndrome psicopatológica”. Memorandum (2020): 37.
  2. Britannica TE of E. “Buddenbrooks”. Encyclopedia Britannica (2020).
  3. Chekhov A. “Ward No. 6”. (1892): 32.
  4. Chekhov A. “Ionych”. (1898): 10.
  5. Глауберман Д. Радость сгорания. Как конец света может стать новым началом (2004): 384.
  6. Pruteanu LM. Stresul ocupaţional şi satisfacţia faţă de locul de muncă în rândul asistenţilor medicali. In: Yearbook of Petre Andrei University Iasi (2014).
  7. “Coping with stress at work” (2018).
  8. Liu M., et al. “Perceived stress among Macao nursing students in the clinical learning environment”. International Journal of Nursing Sciences 2 (2015): 128-133.
  9. Bahri Yusoff MS and Rahman A. “Stress management for medical students: A systematic review”. In: Azcarate, MALV (ed) Social sciences and humanities: applications and theories. InTech (2012): 23.
  10. Aslam HD., et al. “Analysis of the level of stress among doctors in public and private hospitals of Pakistan”. International Journal of Learning and Development 2 (2014): 109-135.
  11. Kamoun S. “Le stress au travail, un enjeu de santé”. Relations Industrielles2 (2018): 4.
  12. Russu-Deleu R., et al. “Evaluarea stresului profesional în rândul medicilor de familie”. Sănătate Publică Econ şi Manag în Med 4 (2019): 161-168.
  13. Yates SW. “Physician stress and burnout.” American Journal of Medicine 2 (2020): 160-164.
  14. Hocine MN., et al. “How to identify and prioritize psychosocial factors impacting stress level”. PLoS One (2016): 1-11.
  15. Kosheleva EY., et al. “Stress factors among international and domestic students in Russia”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 200 (2015): 460-466.
  16. Schaufeli WB., et al. “Burnout: 35 years of research and practice”. Career Development International3 (2009): 204-220.
  17. Maslach C., et al. “Maslach Burnout Inventory”. In: Evaluating stress: A book of resources (1997): 191-218.
  18. Borisova DP and Dvoryanchikov NV. “Interdependence of emotional Burnout syndrome and deviant behaviour among employees of penal system”. Psychology Law2 (2019): 39-53.
  19. Moreno-Jiménez B., et al. “The physician burnout questionnaire: A new definition and measure”. 19.4 (2012): 325-344.
  20. Garcia GPA and Marziale MHP. “Indicators of burnout in Primary Health Care workers”. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem 71 (2018): 2334-2342.
  21. Kumar S. “Burnout and doctors: prevalence, prevention and intervention”. Healthcare4 (2016): 1-9.
  22. Olson KD. “Physician Burnout—A Leading indicator of health system performance?” Mayo Clinic Proceedings 11 (2017): 1608-1611.
  23. Quick JC and Henderson DF. “Occupational stress: Preventing suffering, enhancing wellbeing”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 5 (2016): 1-11.
  24. Etikan I. “Developing questionnaire base on selection and designing”. Biometrics and Biostatistics International Journal 6 (2017): 219-221.

Citation

Citation: Elena Ciobanu., et al. “Testing and Validation of the Questionnaire Identification of Professional Stress Syndrome in Health Workers (IPSSHM)”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 5.8 (2021): 136-142.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2021 Elena Ciobanu., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.111

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is October 20, 2021.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US