Acta Scientific Microbiology (ISSN: 2581-3226)

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 9

The Accuracy of Non-Conventional Methods Compared to Conventional Methods for Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections

Raghdah A Abdulmajeed1, Asif Jiman-Fatani2,4 and Dalia EL-Hossary3*

1Regional lab Makkah, Ministry of Health, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitological, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
3Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
4Clinical and Molecular Microbiology Laboratory, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author: Dalia EL-Hossary, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Received: July 19, 2021 ; Published: August 12, 2021

Abstract

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are severe infections leading to potentially life-threatening illnesses that require quick diagnosis, which ensures that the patient is administered appropriate antimicrobials and proper care. The identification of microorganisms from positive blood cultures by a conventional method usually takes several days. In this study, we investigated the performance of three new rapid technologies viz. MALDI-TOF, FilmArray (BioFire), and Nanosphere for their ability to identify the microorganisms present in positive blood culture bottles directly, before subculture, and compare it with VITEK 2 method (gold standard). A total of 1,766 microorganisms were isolated in this study. The MALDI-TOF identified 437 Gram-positive bacteria out of 443 Gram-positive isolates from a colony subculture, and showed sensitivity, Positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy of 98.7%, 99%, and 98%, respectively. MALDI-TOF correctly identified 403 Gram-negative bacteria (out of 407) with 99% sensitivity, PPV was 100%, and 99% accuracy. The Nanosphere BC-GN assay accurately identified 343 Gram-negative bacteria out of 407 Gram-negative bacteria with sensitivity, PPV, and accuracy of 84.3%, 99%, and 83%, respectively. The BioFire system helped identify 24 microorganisms that commonly cause sepsis, pooled together: 8 Gram-positive strains, 11 Gram-negative strains, 5 Candida species, and three antimicrobial-resistance genes. In our study, out of 443 Gram-positive bacteria, 435 were identified by BioFire with sensitivity, PPV, and accuracy of 98.2%, 99%, and 98.2%, respectively. BioFire could also identify 59 yeast isolates out of 66 with 89% sensitivity, 100% PPV, and 89% accuracy. In conclusion, these new technologies provided fast (in some cases, 48 hours earlier than VITEK 2) and reliable results. Adopting of these technologies should be encouraged in the microbiology labs of the hospitals.

Keywords: Bloodstream Infection; VITEK 2; MALDI-TOF; BioFire; Nanosphere

References

  1. Son JS., et al. "Bloodstream infections and clinical significance of healthcare-associated bacteremia: a multicenter surveillance study in Korean hospitals”. Journal of Korean Medical Science7 (2010): 992-998.
  2. Prabhash K., et al. "Blood stream infections in cancer patients: a single center experience of isolates and sensitivity pattern”. Indian Journal of Cancer2 (2010): 184-188.
  3. Hassan M., et al. "Cost of hospital-acquired infection”. Hospital Topics3 (2010): 82-89.
  4. Samuel LP., et al. "Evaluation of a microarray-based assay for rapid identification of Gram-positive organisms and resistance markers in positive blood cultures”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology4 (2013): 1188-1192.
  5. Ecker DJ., et al. "New technology for rapid molecular diagnosis of bloodstream infections”. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics4 (2010): 399-415.
  6. Carrara L., et al. "Molecular diagnosis of bloodstream infections with a new dual-priming oligonucleotide-based multiplex PCR assay”. Journal of Medical Microbiology11 (2013): 1673-1679.
  7. Zheng X., et al. "Rapid identification of pathogens from pediatric blood cultures by use of the FilmArray blood culture identification panel”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology12 (2014): 4368-4371.
  8. Ward C., et al. "Performance evaluation of the Verigene® (Nanosphere) and FilmArray® (BioFire®) molecular assays for identification of causative organisms in bacterial bloodstream infections”. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases3 (2015): 487-496.
  9. Schmidt V., et al. "Rapid identification of bacteria in positive blood culture by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry”. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases3 (2012): 311-317.
  10. Salimnia H., et al. "Evaluation of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel: Results of a Multicenter Controlled Trial”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology3 (2016): 687-698.
  11. Altun O., et al. "Clinical evaluation of the FilmArray blood culture identification panel in identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood culture bottles”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology12 (2013): 4130-4136.
  12. Sullivan KV., et al. "Pediatric multicenter evaluation of the Verigene gram-negative blood culture test for rapid detection of inpatient bacteremia involving gram-negative organisms, extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, and carbapenemases”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology7 (2014): 2416-2421.
  13. Beal SG., et al. "Evaluation of the nanosphere verigene gram-positive blood culture assay with the VersaTREK blood culture system and assessment of possible impact on selected patients”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology12 (2013): 3988-3992.
  14. Beal SG., et al. "Antibiotic utilization improvement with the Nanosphere Verigene Gram-Positive Blood Culture assay”. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings2 (2015): 139-143.
  15. Dodemont M., et al. "Performance of the Verigene Gram-negative blood culture assay for rapid detection of bacteria and resistance determinants”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology8 (2014): 3085-3087.
  16. Arvanitis M., et al. "Molecular and nonmolecular diagnostic methods for invasive fungal infections”. Clinical Microbiology Reviews3 (2014): 490-526.
  17. Liesenfeld O., et al. "Molecular diagnosis of sepsis: New aspects and recent developments”. European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology1 (2014): 1-25.
  18. Lavergne R-A., et al. "An extraction method of positive blood cultures for direct identification of Candida species by Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry”. Medical Mycology6 (2013): 652-656.
  19. Afshari A., et al. "Bench-to-bedside review: Rapid molecular diagnostics for bloodstream infection - a new frontier?" Critical Care3 (2012): 222.
  20. Cherkaoui A., et al. "Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry methods with conventional phenotypic identification for routine identification of bacteria to the species level”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology4 (2010): 1169-1175.
  21. Carbonnelle E., et al. "MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry tools for bacterial identification in clinical microbiology laboratory”. Clinical Biochemistry1 (2011): 104-109.
  22. Zwadyk P Jr., et al. "Comparison of Difco ESP and Organon Teknika BacT/Alert continuous-monitoring blood culture systems”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology5 (1994): 1273-1279.
  23. Kocoglu ME., et al. "Evaluation of negative results of BacT/Alert 3D automated blood culture system”. Journal of Microbiology3 (2005): 257-259.
  24. Livermore DM., et al. "Multicentre evaluation of the VITEK 2 Advanced Expert System for interpretive reading of antimicrobial resistance tests”. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy2 (2002): 289-300.
  25. Wallet F., et al. "Performances of VITEK 2 colorimetric cards for identification of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology9 (2005): 4402-4406.
  26. Pincus DH. "Microbial identification using the bioMérieuxVitek® 2 system”. In Encyclopedia of Rapid Microbiological Methods; Parenteral Drug Association: Bethesda, MD, USA, (2006): 1-32.
  27. Hata DJ., et al. "Multicenter evaluation of the new VITEK 2 advanced colorimetric yeast identification card”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology4 (2007): 1087-1092.
  28. Dubois D., et al. "Performances of the Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system for rapid identification of bacteria in routine clinical microbiology”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology8 (2012): 2568-2576.
  29. Patel R. "MALDI-TOF MS for the diagnosis of infectious diseases”. Clinical Chemistry1 (2015): 100-111.
  30. Fiori B., et al. "Optimized Use of the MALDI BioTyper System and the FilmArray BCID Panel for Direct Identification of Microbial Pathogens from Positive Blood Cultures”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology3 (2016): 576-584.
  31. Poritz MA., et al. "FilmArray, an automated nested multiplex PCR system for multi-pathogen detection: development and application to respiratory tract infection”. PLoS ONE10 (2011): e26047.
  32. Ledeboer NA., et al. "Identification of Gram-Negative Bacteria and Genetic Resistance Determinants from Positive Blood Culture Broths by Use of the Verigene Gram-Negative Blood Culture Multiplex Microarray-Based Molecular Assay”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology8 (2015): 2460-2472.
  33. Martinez RM., et al. "Evaluation of three rapid diagnostic methods for direct identification of microorganisms in positive blood cultures”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology7 (2014): 2521-2529.
  34. Aubertine CL., et al. "Comparative study of the new colorimetric VITEK 2 yeast identification card versus the older fluorometric card and of CHROMagar Candida as a source medium with the new card”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology1 (2006): 227-228.
  35. Huang AM., et al. "Impact of rapid organism identification via matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight combined with antimicrobial stewardship team intervention in adult patients with bacteremia and candidemia”. Clinical Infectious Diseases9 (2013): 1237-1245.
  36. Luethy PM., et al. “The Use of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for the Identification of Pathogens Causing Sepsis”. The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine4 (2019): 675-685.
  37. Dai Y., et al. “Evaluation of a Rapid and Simplified Protocol for Direct Identification of Microorganisms From Positive Blood Cultures by Using Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)”. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 11 (2021): 632679.
  38. Howard AK., et al. “Performance of Verigene Rapid Diagnostic Testing for Detection of Inpatient Pediatric Bacteremia”. The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics5 (2021): 472-477.
  39. Tansarli GS., et al. “Diagnostic test accuracy of the BioFire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis panel: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Clinical Microbiology and Infection3 (2020): 281-290.
  40. Goff DA., et al. "Using rapid diagnostic tests to optimize antimicrobial selection in antimicrobial stewardship programs”. Pharmacotherapy8 (2012): 677-687.
  41. Eigner U., et al. "Performance of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry system for the identification of bacterial isolates in the clinical routine laboratory”. Clinical Laboratory 55 (2009): 289-296.
  42. Rychert J., et al. "Multicenter evaluation of the Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system for identification of Gram-positive aerobic bacteria”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology7 (2013): 2225-2231.
  43. Lee MR., et al. "Bacteraemia caused by Weissella confusa at a university hospital in Taiwan, 1997-2007”. Clinical Microbiology and Infection8 (2011): 1226-1231.
  44. Kaleta EJ., et al. "Comparative analysis of PCR-electrospray ionization/mass spectrometry (MS) and MALDI-TOF/MS for the identification of bacteria and yeast from positive blood culture bottles”. Clinical Chemistry7 (2011): 1057-1067.
  45. Richter SS., et al. "Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry using the VITEK MS system”. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases12 (2013): 1571-1578.
  46. Bork JT., et al. "Rapid testing using the Verigene Gram-negative blood culture nucleic acid test in combination with antimicrobial stewardship intervention against Gram-negative bacteremia”. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy3 (2015): 1588-1595.
  47. Bhatti MM., et al. "Evaluation of FilmArray and Verigene systems for rapid identification of positive blood cultures”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology9 (2014): 3433-3436.
  48. Fhooblall M., et al. "Evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification Panel on positive blood cultures in a regional hospital laboratory in KwaZulu-Natal”. African Journal of Laboratory Medicine1 (2016): 411.

Citation

Citation: Dalia EL-Hossary., et al. “The Accuracy of Non-Conventional Methods Compared to Conventional Methods for Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections ”. Acta Scientific Microbiology 4.9(2021): 69-80.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2021 Dalia EL-Hossary., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor0.810

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is October 20, 2021.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US