Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ASDS)(ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 9

CBCT Based Anatomic Juxtaposition of Mandibular Canal to Deeply Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Rationale for Coronectomy

Urvi Hiren Shah1*, Hiren Dharmendra Patel2, Haren Bharat Pandya3, Hitesh Sudarshan Dewan3, Bijal Chetas Bhavsar4 and Rajvi Amar Desai5

1Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
2Dean, Professor and Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
3Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
4Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
5Post Graduate Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India

*Corresponding Author: Urvi Hiren Shah, Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.

Received: June 29, 2023; Published: August 14, 2023

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate diagnosis and a minimally invasive surgical procedure for avoidance of injury to mandibular canal housing the inferior alveolar apparatus in relation to deeply impaced lower third molars is the need of the hour. Coronectomy, a relatively safe and novel technique, in synchronization with a Cone Beam Computarized Tomography can be evaluated further for its application towards management of the lower third molars in juxtaposition of the canal.

Aim: To evaluate clinical outcomes of coronectomy procedure performed to forestall inferior alveolar nuerosensory deficit in CBCT analyzed mandibular impacted third molars.

Patients and Methods: Patients were assessed with CBCT for impacted third molars in proximity to mandibular canal. Coronectomy was performed in 25 cases selected as per patient selection criteria. Evaluation of these patients was done in terms of possible outcomes like pain, swelling, infection and root migration and complication of neurosensory deficit at 1day, 1 week, 3 months and 6 months post operatively.

Results: Out of 25 patients only 1 patient had pain and swelling at the end of 6 months. Root migration was observed at the end of 3 months in 1 patient and at the end of 6 months in 5 cases. In 1 case, pain and swelling were still present at the end of 6 months which required root removal.

Conclusion: Coronectomy is a preferable and dependable treatment option for lower third molars in proximity of mandibular canal as in step with CBCT understanding as it is by all accounts related with less complications.

 Keywords: Mandibular Third molar, mandibular canal, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Coronectomy

References

  1. Sarikov R and Juodzbalys G. “Inferior alveolar nerve injury after mandibular third molar extraction: a literature review”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Research4 (2014): e1.
  2. Kouwenberg AJ., et al. “Coronectomy of the mandibular third molar: Respect for the inferior alveolar nerve”. Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery5 (2016): 616-21.
  3. Kang F., et al. “Coronectomy: A Useful Approach in Minimizing Nerve Injury Compared With Traditional Extraction of Deeply Impacted Mandibular Third Molars”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery11 (2019): 2221.e1-2221.e14.
  4. Petia F Pechalova and Nikolai V Pavlov. “Coronectomy of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars - Method for Prevention of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury”. SMGroup Journals9 (2015): 1278-1276.
  5. Valenzuela-Fuezalida JJ., et al. “Anatomical Variation of mandibular canal and their clinical implication in dental practice”. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy8 (2021): 1259-1272.
  6. Patel PS., et al. “Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation”. Indian Journal of Dental Research 31 (2020): 91-102.
  7. Ecuyer J and Debien J. “Deductions operatoires”. Actualités Odonto-Stomatologiques148 (1984): 695-702.
  8. Khawaja N and Renton T. “Case studies on implant removal influencing the resolution of inferior alveolar nerve injury”. British Dental Journal7 (2009): 365-370.
  9. Williams M and Tollervey D. “Lower third molar surgery - consent and coronectomy”. British Dental Journal 6 (2016): 287-288.
  10. Gu L., et al. “Anatomic study of the position of the mandibular canal and corresponding mandibular third molar on cone-beam computed tomography images”. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 6 (2018): 609-614.
  11. Pedersen MH., et al. “Coronectomy of mandibular third molars: a clinical and radiological study of 231 cases with a mean follow-up period of 5.7years”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 12 (2018): 1596-1603.
  12. Dolanmaz D., et al. “A preferable technique for protecting the inferior alveolar nerve: coronectomy”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery6 (2009): 1234-1238.
  13. Rood JP and Shehab BA. “The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery”. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery1 (1990): 20-25.
  14. Alkhader M., et al. “The visibility of mandibular canal on orthoradial and oblique CBCT slices at molar implant sites”. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment (2016).
  15. Ghaeminia H., et al. “Clinical relevance of cone beam computed tomography in mandibular third molar removal: A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial”. Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery10 (2015): 2158-2167.
  16. Pogrel MA., et al. “Coronectomy: a technique to protect the inferior alveolar nerve”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery12 (2004): 1447-1452.
  17. Renton T., et al. “A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars”. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1 (2005): 7-12.

Citation

Citation: Urvi Hiren Shah., et al. “CBCT Based Anatomic Juxtaposition of Mandibular Canal to Deeply Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Rationale for Coronectomy".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 7.9 (2023): 22-29.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Urvi Hiren Shah., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate34%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor0.871

Indexed In







News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is November 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US









ff

© 2024 Acta Scientific, All rights reserved.