Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ASDS)(ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 12

Crossfit®: An Approach to Bite Force and Masticatory Muscle Thickness

Lígia Franco Oliveira1, Marcelo Palinkas1,2*, Nayara Soares da Silva1, Natália de Morais Barbosa1, Evandro Marianetti Fioco1, Edson Donizetti Verri1, Saulo César Vallin Fabrin1, Guilherme Gallo Costa Gomes1, Isabela Hallak Regalo1, Selma Siéssere1,2 and Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo1,2

1Department of Basic and Oral Biology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Brazil
2Department of Neuroscience and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo and National Institute and Technology - Translational Medicine (INCT.TM), Brazil

*Corresponding Author: Marcelo Palinkas, Department of Basic and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

Received: October 27, 2021; Published: November 30, 2021

Abstract

 &nbssp;Crossfit® is based on physical improvements related to strength and endurance. This study aimed to evaluate the molar bite force and masticatory muscle thickness in athletes practicing Crossfit®. This cross-sectional study included 40 participants who were divided into groups: athletes who had been practicing Crossfit® (n = 20) and healthy participants who were not practicing physical exercise (n = 20). The molar bite force (right and left sides) was measured using a dynamometer. The thickness of the masseter and temporalis muscles at rest and dental clenching in maximum voluntary contraction tasks were analyzed using ultrasound. The data were analyzed using a t-test with a 5% significance level. Significant differences were found in the right (p = 0.001) and left (p = 0.008) maximum bite forces between the two groups. The Crossfit® group showed a greater maximum bite force than the non-sports group. There were significant differences in the thickness of the right (p = 0.032) and left (p = 0.004) masseter muscles during dental clenching in maximum voluntary contraction, and in the thickness of the left masseter muscle (p = 0.015) at rest. The Crossfit® group showed greater muscle thickness than the non-sports group. The results of this study suggest that Crossfit® produces morphofunctional changes in the stomatognathic system when maximum bite force and masseter and temporalis muscles thickness are observed. We highlight the importance of analyzing the stomatognathic system of athletes who practice strength and endurance sports, showing the importance of knowing the functional characteristics of the organism as a whole to improve physical performance.

Keywords: Crossfit®; Physical Activity; Bite Force; Muscle Thickness; Masticatory Muscle

References

  1. Stamos A., et al. “The european association for sports dentistry, academy for sports dentistry, european college of sports and exercise physician’s consensus statement on sports dentistry integration in sports medicine”. Dental Traumatology 36 (2020): 680-684.
  2. Alkan B., et al. “Effects of exercise on periodontal parameters in obese women”. The Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 23 (2020): 1345-1355.
  3. Ghone U., et al. “Revisiting sports dentistry with a critical appraisal”. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 22 (2021): 105-106.
  4. Park H.K., et al. “Sports-related oral and maxillofacial injuries: a 5-year retrospective study, Pusan National University Dental Hospital”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 79 (2021): 203.
  5. Wang J-S., et al. “Mouthguard-effect of high-intensity weight training on masticatory muscle tone and stiffness in taekwondo athletes”. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation 16 (2020): 510-515.
  6. Kinjo R., et al. “Development of a wearable mouth guard device for monitoring teeth clenching during exercise”. Sensors (Basel) 21 (2021): 1503.
  7. Kusy K., et al. “Aging athlete's heart: an echocardiographic evaluation of competitive sprint- versus endurance-trained master athletes”. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 11 (2021): 1160-1169.
  8. Hamdouni H., et al. “Effect of three fitness programs on strength, speed, flexibility and muscle power on sedentary subjects”. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness (2021).
  9. Dos Santos Quaresma MVL., et al. “Effects of diet interventions, dietary supplements, and performance-enhancing substances on the performance of CrossFit-trained individuals: A systematic review of clinical studies”. Nutrition 82 (2021): 110994.
  10. Mangine GT., et al “Workout pacing predictors of Crossfit® open performance: a pilot study”. Journal of Human Kinetics 78 (2021): 89-100.
  11. Schlegel P. “Crossfit® training strategies from the perspective of concurrent training: a systematic review”. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 19 (2020): 670-680.
  12. Shraim MA., et al. “Systematic review and synthesis of mechanism-based classification systems for pain experienced in the musculoskeletal system”. The Clinical Journal of Pain 36 (2020): 793-812.
  13. Bahremand M., et al. “A comparison of CrossFit and concurrent training on myonectin, insulin resistance and physical performance in healthy young women”. Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry (2020): 1-7.
  14. Saratti CM., et al. “Functional assessment of the stomatognathic system. Part 2: The role of dynamic elements of analysis”. Quintessence International (2021): 2-14.
  15. Fioco EM., et al. “Analysis of bite force, EMG, and thickness of the masticatory muscles in swimmers: crawl modality”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 2 (2018): 33-40.
  16. Palinkas M., et al. “Age and gender influence on maximal bite force and masticatory muscles thickness”. Archives of Oral Biology 55 (2010): 797-802.
  17. Manzon L., et al. “Bite force in elderly with full natural dentition and different rehabilitation prosthesis”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (2021): 1424.
  18. Bonjardim LR., et al. “Association between symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and gender, morphological occlusion, and psychological factors in a group of university students”. Indian Journal of Dental Research 20 (2019): 190-194.
  19. Bertram S., et al. “Cross-sectional characteristics of the masseter muscle: an ultrasonographic study”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 32 (2003): 64-68.
  20. Andrade AS., et al. “Electromyographic activity and thickness of masticatory muscles in children with unilateral posterior crossbite”. Clinical Anatomy 22 (2009): 200-206.
  21. Righetti MA., et al. “Osteoarthrosis: analyse of the molar bite force, thickness and masticatory efficiency”. Prague Medical Report 121 (2020): 87-95.
  22. da Silva JM., et al. “Influence of mandibular tori on stomatognathic system function”. Cranio 35 (2017): 30-37.
  23. Lockie RG., et al. “The impact of formal strength and conditioning on the fitness of law enforcement recruits: a retrospective cohort study”. International Journal of Exercise Science 13 (2020): 1615-1629.
  24. Sleutjes BTHM., et al. “Impact of stimulus duration on motor unit thresholds and alternation in compound muscle action potential scans”. Clinical Neurophysiology 132 (2021): 323-331.
  25. de Souza Leite F., et al. “Sarcomere length nonuniformity and force regulation in myofibrils and sarcomeres”. Biophysical Journal 119 (2020): 2372-2377.
  26. Castelo PM., et al. “Masticatory muscle thickness, bite force, and occlusal contacts in young children with unilateral posterior crossbite”. European Journal of Orthodontics 29 (2007): 149-156.
  27. Ringqvist M. “Fiber types in human masticatory muscles. Relation to function”. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 82 (1974): 333-355.
  28. Ben-Zeev T., et al. “High-intensity functional training: molecular mechanisms and benefits”. Neuromolecular Medicine 23 (2021): 335-338.
  29. Hasegawa K., et al. “Does clenching reduce indirect head acceleration during rugby contact?” Dental Traumatology 30 (2014): 259-264.
  30. Leroux E., et al. “Influence of dental occlusion on the athletic performance of young elite rowers: a pilot study”. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 73 (2018): e453.
  31. Toledo R., et al. “Comparison of physiological responses and training load between different Crossfit® workouts with equalized volume in men and women”. Life (Basel) 11 (2021): 586.
  32. Nalbandian M., et al. “Lactate metabolism and satellite cell fate”. Frontiers in Physiology 2020 (2020): 610983.
  33. Godfrey RJ., et al. “The exercise-induced growth hormone response in athletes”. Sports Medicine 33 (2003): 599-613.
  34. Lodjak J., et al. “Insulin-like growth factor 1 of wild vertebrates in a life-history context”. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 518 (2020): 110978.
  35. Hameed M., et al. “Sarcopenia and hypertrophy: a role for insulin-like growth factor-1 in aged muscle?” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 30 (2002): 15-19.
  36. Barbalho SM., et al. “Myokines: a descriptive review”. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 60 (2020): 1583-1590.
  37. Barton ER., et al. “Functional muscle hypertrophy by increased insulin-like growth factor 1 does not require dysferlin”. Muscle and Nerve 60 (2019): 464-473.
  38. Rocha LC., et al. “Repercussions on sarcomeres of the myotendinous junction and the myofibrillar type adaptations in response to different trainings on vertical ladder”. Microscopy Research and Technique 83 (2020): 1190-1197.
  39. Schlegel P. “CrossFit® Training strategies from the perspective of concurrent training: a systematic review”. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 19 (2020): 670-680.
  40. Powers SK., et al. “Exercise-induced oxidative stress: cellular mechanisms and impact on muscle force production”. Physiological Reviews 88 (2008): 1243-1276.

Citation

Citation: Marcelo Palinkas., et al. “Crossfit®: An Approach to Bite Force and Masticatory Muscle Thickness”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 5.12 (2021): 95-101.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2021 Marcelo Palinkas., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is December 15, 2022.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US