Manish Tailor*

Head of the Department, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oncology, Kshetrapal Multispeciality Hospital and Research Centre, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India

*Corresponding Author: Manish Tailor, Head of the Department, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oncology, Kshetrapal Multispeciality Hospital and Research Centre, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India.

Received: August 27, 2021; Published: September 07, 2021

Abstract

Purpose of the Review Article: To review the advantages of enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in nonhead and neck disciplines and to portray early execution endeavors in significant head and neck surgeries.

Ongoing Research: Several researches have taken on ERAS protocol for significant head and neck a medical procedure and exhibited its achievability and adequacy.

Summary: There is developing proof that clinical and monetary results for patients going through significant head and neck a medical procedure recovery can be altogether improved by normalizing preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative therapy protocols. Current experience is restricted to single focuses. A future objective is to expand the reception of ERAS in head and neck careful oncology to incorporate public and worldwide joint effort, information sharing, and learning.

Keywords: Upgraded Recuperation After Medical Procedure; Head and Neck Surgery; Oncology

References

1. Wennberg J and Gittelsohn. “Small area variations in healthcare delivery”. Science 182 (1973): 1102-1108.
2. Perrin JM., et al. “Variations in rates of hospitalization of children in three urban communities”. The New England Journal of Medicine 320 (1989): 1183-1187.
3. Thomas A., et al. “Surgeon and hospital cost variability for septoplasty and inferior turbinate reduction”. International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology 6 (2016): 1069-1074.
4. Goitein L and James B. “Standardized best practices and individual craft-based medicine: a conversation about quality”. JAMA Internal Medicine 176 (2016): 835-838.
5. James BC. “Quality improvement in the hospital: managing clinical processes”. Internist 34 (1993): 11-13.
6. James BC. “Implementing practice guidelines through clinical quality improvement”. Frontiers of Health Services Management 10 (1993): 3-37.
7. Nicholson A., et al. “Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients”. British Journal of Surgery 101 (2014): 172-188.
8. Chu BS., et al. “Improvement and persistent disparities in completion lymph node dissection: lessons from the National Cancer Database”. Journal of Surgical Oncology 116 (2017): 1176-1184.
9. Eddy DM., et al. “Individualized guidelines: the potential for increasing quality and reducing costs”. Annals of Internal Medicine 154 (2011): 627-634.
10. Eddy DM., et al. “The potential effects of HEDIS performance measures on the quality of care”. Health Affairs 27 (2008): 1429-1441.
11. Goepfert RP., et al. “Complications, hospital length of stay, and readmission after total laryngectomy”. Cancer 123 (2017): 1760-1767.
12. Lewis CM., et al. “Development and feasibility of a specialty specific national surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP): the head and neck-reconstructive surgery NSQIP”. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 142 (2016): 321-327.
13. Lira RB., et al. “Quality assessment in head and neck oncologic surgery in a Brazilian cancer center compared with MD Anderson Cancer Center benchmarks”. Head Neck 38 (2016): 1002-1007.
14. Nelson G., et al. “Cost impact analysis of enhanced recovery after surgery program implementation in Alberta colon cancer patients”. Current Oncology 23 (2016): e221-e227.
15. Yeung JK., et al. “Reduction of pulmonary complications and hospital length of stay with a clinical care pathway after head and neck reconstruction”. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 133 (2014): 1477-1484.
16. Kehlet H and Moensen T. “Hospital stay of 2 days following open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme”. British Journal of Surgery 86 (1999): 227-230.
17. Kehlet H. “Fast-track colorectal surgery”. Lancet 371 (2008): 791-793.
18. Wind J., et al. “Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery”. British Journal of Surgery 93 (2006): 800-809.
19. Eskicioglu C., et al. “Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials”. The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 13 (2009): 2321-2329.
20. Varadhan KK., et al. “The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials”. Clinical Nutrition 29 (2010): 434-440.
21. Fearon KC., et al. “Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection”. Clinical Nutrition 24 (2005): 466-477.
22. Maessen J., et al. “A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection”. British Journal of Surgery 94 (2007): 224-231.
23. Meerwein C., et al. “Airway management in head and neck cancer patients undergoing microvascular free tissue transfer: delayed extubation as an alternative to routine tracheotomy”. Swiss Medical Weekly 144 (2014): w13941.
24. Liu CC., et al. “Early versus late tracheostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 152 (2015): 219-227.
25. Harris JR., et al. “Members of the Alberta Provincial Head and Neck Tumour Team. Healthcare delivery for head-and-neck cancer patients in Alberta: a practice guideline”. Current Oncology 21 (2014): e704-e714.
26. Dautremont JF., et al. “Cost-effectiveness analysis of a postoperative clinical care pathway in head and neck surgery with microvascular reconstruction”. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 42 (2013): 59.
27. Doherty C., et al. “A standardized operative team for major head and neck cancer ablation and reconstruction”. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 130 (2012): 82-88.
28. Dautremont JF., et al. “Understanding the impact of a clinical care pathway for major head and neck cancer resection on postdischarge healthcare utilization”. Head Neck1 (2016): E1216-E1220.
29. Thanh NX., et al. “An economic evaluation of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) multisite implementation program for colorectal surgery in Alberta”. Canadian Journal of Surgery 59 (2016): 415-421.
30. Husbands JM., et al. “Clinical care pathways: decreasing resource utilization in head and neck surgical patients”. Archives of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery 121 (1999): 755-759.
31. Weber RS., et al. “Quality and performance indicators in an academic department of head and neck surgery”. Archives of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery 136 (2010): 1212-1218.
32. Dort JC., et al. “Optimal perioperative care in major head and neck cancer surgery with free flap reconstruction: a consensus review and recommendations from the enhanced recovery after surgery society”. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 143 (2017): 292-303.
33. Gemma M., et al. “Enhanced recovery program (ERP) in major laryngeal surgery: building a protocol and testing its feasibility”. ACTA Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 37 (2017): 475-478.
34. Coyle MJ., et al. “Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and for head and neck oncology patients”. Clinical Otolaryngology 41 (2016): 118-126.
35. McMahon J., et al. “Postoperative com-and plications after head and neck operations that require free tissue transfer- prevalent, morbid, and costly”. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 55 (2017): 809-814.
36. Pisarska M., et al. “Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis”. PLoS One 12 (2017): e0174382.
37. Martin D., et al. “A multicentre qualitative study assessing implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program”. Clinical Nutrition (2017): S0261-5614.
38. Brandal D., et al. “Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery and opioid-free anesthesia on opioid prescriptions at discharge from the hospital: a historical-prospective study”. Anesthesia and Analgesia 125 (2017): 1784-1792.

Citation

Citation: Manish Tailor. “The Potential Relevance of Accelerated Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Reducing Morbidity and Complications After Major Head and Neck Cancer Surgery”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 5.10 (2021): 07-14.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2021 Manish Tailor. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.