Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ASDS)(ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 8

Does Maxillary Sinus have any Influence on the Skeletal Class or Facial Type?

Hiba Gmati1*, Mariem Nasfi1, Mounira Rtibi1, Ines Methioub1, Anissa El Yemni Zinelabidine2 and Abdellatif Boughzela2

1Resident in Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Farhat Hached Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia
2Professor in Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Farhat Hached Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia

*Corresponding Author: Hiba Gmati, Resident in Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Farhat Hached Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia.

Received: June 24, 2021; Published: July 19, 2021


Introduction: Maxillary sinuses are very important cavities of the face. Their relationship with some teeth allows to suggest that maxillary sinus development may affect skeletal malocclusions and vertical facial types.

Aim: To determine the relationship between maxillary sinus size, vertical facial types, and different skeletal classes for both genders in a Tunisian population.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study on 60 lateral cephalograms of Tunisian males and females aged between 12 and 29 years was performed. They were classified into three groups based on ANB, FMA, and GOGN-SN angles.

Five measurements were used to assess the maxillary sinus size: two linear and three areas. They were calculated manually in all the radiographs. ANOVA test was used to determine the relationship between the different measurements.

Results: All measurements were found to be greater in males than in females. No significant association was observed for both skeletal classes and facial types.

Conclusion: No relation was observed between maxillary sinus size, skeletal classes and facial types.

Keywords: Lateral Cephalograms; Maxillary Sinus; Skeletal Classes; Vertical Facial Types


  1. Al-Azzawi AM. “Maxillary sinus Area in both Gender and its Relation to Skeletal Class III Malocclusion”. Medical Journal of Babylon 2 (2013): 508-516.
  2. Alberti PW. “Applied surgical anatomy of the maxillary sinus”. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 9 (1976): 3-20.
  3. Ariji Y., et al. “Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: a study using computed tomography”. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 23 (1994): 163-168.
  4. Ayman H Urabi. “Digital lateral cephalometric assessment of maxillary sinus dimensions in different skeletal classes”. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry 1 (2012): 35-38.
  5. Daraze A. “Maxillary sinus size in different gender and sagittal skeletal classes: orthodontics and forensic interests”. Orthodontics1 (2016).
  6. Downs W B. “Variations in facial relationship: their significance in treatment and prognosis”. American Journal of Orthodontics 10 (1948): 812-840.
  7. Emirzeoglu M., et al. “Volumetric evaluation of the paranasal maxillary sinuses in normal subjects using computer tomography images: a stereological study”. Auris Nasus Larynx 34 (2007): 191-195.
  8. Endo T., et al. “Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary sinus sizes in different malocclusion classes”. Odontology1 (2010): 65-72.
  9. Graney DO and Rice DH. “Anatomy”. In: Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM, Harker LA, Krause CJ, Schuller DE, editors. Otolaryngology: head and neck surgery (2nded). St. Louis: Mosby Year Book (1993): 901-906.
  10. Jalal FA. “Estimation of gender and age using spiral CT scanning of maxillary sinuses and foramen magnum [Thesis]. Baghdad: Departmentoforal and maxillofacial radiology 2008, college of dentistry university of Baghdad (2008).
  11. Jun BC., et al. “The analysis of maxillary sinus aeration according to aging process; volume assessment by 3-dimensional reconstruction by high- resolutional CT scanning”. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 132 (2005): 429-434.
  12. Kwak HH., et al. “Topographic anatomy of the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus in Koreans”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 33 (2004): 382-388.
  13. Porter G., et al. “Paranasal maxillary sinus anatomy and function” (2002).
  14. Qadir M and Mushtaq M. “Maxillary sinus size and malocclusion: Is there any relation?” International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences4 (2017): 333-337.
  15. Rakosi T. “An Atlas and manual of cephalometric radiology”. London: Wolfe Medical Publications 26 (1982): 40-46.
  16. Suzuki H., et al. “Rhinologic computed tomogram evaluation in patients with cleft lip and palate”. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 125 (1999): 1000-1004.


Citation: Hiba Gmati., et al. “Does Maxillary Sinus have any Influence on the Skeletal Class or Facial Type?”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 5.8 (2021): 52-58.


Copyright: © 2021 Hiba Gmati., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is July 10, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US