Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ASDS)(ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 6

Geometric Analysis of Curved Canals Prepared by HyFlex EDM Versus HyFlex CM Rotary Nickel Titanium Files: An In-Vitro Study

Mohamed Moftah Mohamed1*, Shaimaa Ismail Gawdat2 and Reem A Lutfy3

1MSD Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
2Associate Professor of Endodontics, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
3Professor of Endodontics, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt

*Corresponding Author: Mohamed Moftah Mohamed, Masters Student, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt and Shaimaa Ismail Gawdat, Associate Professor of Endodontics, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt.

Received: April 08, 2021; Published: May 29, 2021

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate 2 file systems: HyFlex EDM and HyFlex CM in preparing severely curved mesiobuccal canals of human mandibular molars regarding: the centering ability, transportation of the canal and ability to maintain canal radius of curvature, utilizing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and Methods: A sum of thirty mesiobuccal root canals of extracted human mandibular molars having angle of curvature ranging from 25 - 45 ͦ (according to Schneider) were selected and assigned into two groups; HyFlex EDM and HyFlex CM. The distal roots with the respective part of the crowns of all samples were sectioned and discarded after access cavities preparation and working length determination. Samples were mounted in two molds of acrylic resin for pre and post-instrumentation imaging utilizing CBCT. Root canal preparation was done by each NiTi system according to the manufacturers' instructions. The CBCT images at the root canal levels (3, 5 and 8 mm from the tooth apex) were superimposed using a fusion module of OnDemand 3D App software for dentin thickness measurement. Ability to maintain canal radius of curvature was recorded following Estrela., et al. while canal transportation and centering ability were recorded following a formula introduced by Gambill., et al. Data was tabulated and statistically analyzed.

Statistical Analysis: Data was tabulated and statistically analyzed; Independent samples t-test was used for comparing the change in the radius of canal curvature angle between the two groups and also was used for comparing the variables between the two groups at each root canal level. The significance level is considered at P ≤ 0.05.

Results: The HyFlex EDM recorded statistically lower mean value at the 5 mm level, while at the 8 mm level it recorded statistically higher mean value of root canal transportation than HyFlex CM. There was no statistically significant difference regarding direction of root canal transportation and centering ability between the two rotary systems. Concerning the ability to maintain canal radius of curvature, a statistically significant difference was found between pre and post radii of curvature for each file system, but no significant difference was found between the two systems.

Conclusion: Under the limitations of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that; HyFlex EDM and HyFlex CM systems were relatively safe in preparation of curved root canals and were not able to achieve perfect centering ability during root canal preparation. HyFlex CM has shown more straightening regarding the radius of curvature.

Keywords: Canal Transportation; Centering Ability; Canal Radius of Curvature; HyFlex EDM; HyFlex CM; CBCT

References

  1. Löst C. “Consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology on quality guidelines for endodontic treatment”. International Endodontic Journal3 (1994): 115-124.
  2. Habib AA., et al. “Methodologies used in quality assessment of root canal preparation techniques: Review of the literature”. The Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences 2 (2015): 123-131.
  3. Estrela C., et al. “Method for determination of root curvature radius using cone-beam computed tomography images”. Brazilian Dental Journal2 (2008): 114-118.
  4. Daokar S and Kalekar A. “Endodontic Failures-A Review”. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 5 (2013): 5-10.
  5. Walia HM., et al. “An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files”. Journal of Endodontics7 (1988): 346-351.
  6. Peters OA. “Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review”. Journal of Endodontics8 (2004): 559-567.
  7. Garip Y and Günday M. “The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals”. International Endodontic Journal 6 (2001): 452-457.
  8. Srivastava S. “Current Strategies in Metallurgical Advances of Rotary NiTi Instruments: A Review”. Journal of Dental Health, Oral Disorders and Therapy1 (2018).
  9. Haapasalo M and Shen Y. “Evolution of nickel-titanium instruments: from past to future”. Endodontic Topics1 (2013): 3-17.
  10. Iacono F., et al. “Wear analysis and cyclic fatigue resistance of electro discharge machined NiTi rotary instruments”. Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia1 (2016): 64-68.
  11. Pedullà E., et al. “Influence of cyclic torsional preloading on cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel - titanium instruments”. International Endodontic Journal11 (2015): 1043-1050.
  12. Özyürek T., et al. “Shaping Ability of Reciproc, WaveOne GOLD, and HyFlex EDM Single-file Systems in Simulated S-shaped Canals”. Journal of Endodontics 5 (2017): 805-809.
  13. Venino PM., et al. “A Micro-computed Tomography Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Two Nickel-titanium Instruments, HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next”. Journal of Endodontics 4 (2017): 628-632.
  14. Bürklein S., et al. “Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments”. International Endodontic Journal 5 (2014): 470-476.
  15. Saber SEDM., et al. “Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals”. International Endodontic Journal 2 (2015): 131-136.
  16. Bhaumik T., et al. “Comparison of Apical Transportation And Centering Ability of Protaper Next, Hyflex CM And Twisted Files by Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography”. Journal of Medical and Dental Science Research (JMDSR) 12 (2017): 29-34.
  17. Meena N and Kowsky R. “Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics: A Review”. Dentistry07 (2014): 2-9.
  18. Schneider SW. “A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology2 (1971): 271-275.
  19. Bahaa M., et al. “Geometric Analysis of Mesio-buccal Root Canals of Mandibular Molars Prepared by (M-pro), FlexMaster and RaCe File systems: An In Vitro Study”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences4 (2021): 172-183.
  20. Gambill JM., et al. “Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography”. Journal of Endodontics7 (1996): 369-375.
  21. Schilder H. “Cleaning and shaping the root canal”. Dental Clinics of North America 2 (1974): 269-296.
  22. Zuckerman O., et al. “Flare-up” during endodontic treatment--etiology and management”. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim2 (2007): 19-26.
  23. Weine FS., et al. “The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape”. Journal of Endodontics8 (1975): 255-262.
  24. Dhar V. “Evidence-based dentistry: An overview”. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry3 (2016): 293.
  25. Zhao D., et al. “Micro-Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Preparation of Mesiobuccal Root Canals in Maxillary First Molars with Hyflex CM, Twisted Files, and K3 Instruments”. The Journal of Endodontics3 (2013): 385-388.
  26. Capar ID., et al. “Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Nickel-Titanium Coronal Flaring Instruments”. The Journal of Endodontics8 (2014): 1182-1185.
  27. Silva De Amorim L., et al. “Comparative Analysis Of Root Canal Anatomy After Mechanical Preparation With Hyflex Cm Tm And Hyflex Edm Tm [Internet]. University of Lisbon”. University of Lisbon (2016).
  28. Gavini G., et al. “Nickel-titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art”. Brazilian Oral Research 1 (2018): 67.
  29. Singh H., et al. “Revolutionizing the Art and Science of Endodontics”. Journal of Dental Health, Oral Disorders and Therapy7 (2016): 1-0.
  30. Pinheiro SR., et al. “Evaluation of apical transportation and centring ability of five thermally treated NiTi rotary systems”. International Endodontic Journal6 (2018): 705-713.
  31. Al-Asadi AI and Al-Hashimi R. “In-vitro Assessing the Shaping Ability of Three Nickel-Titanium Rotary Single File Systems by Cone Beam Computed Tomography”. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences2 (2018): 69-74.
  32. Elashiry MM., et al. “Comparison of Shaping Ability of Different Single-File Systems Using Microcomputed Tomography”. European Journal of Dentistry1 (2020): 70.
  33. Razcha C., et al. “Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of 4 Heat-Treated Nickel-Titanium Systems”. Journal of Endodontics5 (2020): 675-681.
  34. Mahran AH and AboEl-Fotouh MM. “Comparison of Effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on Cervical Dentin Thickness and Root Canal Volume by Using Multislice Computed Tomography”. Journal of Endodontics10 (2008): 1219-1222.
  35. Vahid A., et al. “A comparative study of four rotary NiTi instruments in preserving canal curvature, preparation time and change of working length”. Australian Endodontic Journal2 (2009): 93-97.
  36. Bergmans L., et al. “Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments”. International Endodontic Journal4 (2003): 288-295.
  37. Yang GB., et al. “Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in curved root canals of extracted teeth”. International Endodontic Journal 9 (2007): 707-714.
  38. Sonntag D., et al. “Root canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3, Mtwo and ProTaper”. Australian Endodontic Journal2 (2007): 73-81.
  39. Silva EJNL., et al. “Quantitative Transportation Assessment in Simulated Curved Canals Prepared with an Adaptive Movement System”. Journal of Endodontics7 (2015): 1125-1129.
  40. Hashem AAR., et al. “Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems”. Journal of Endodontics7 (2012): 996-1000.
  41. González Sánchez JA., et al. “Centring ability and apical transportation after overinstrumentation with ProTaper Universal and ProFile Vortex instruments”. International Endodontic Journal6 (2012): 542-551.
  42. Marzouk AM and Ghoneim AG. “Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems”. Journal of Endodontics7 (2013): 906-909.
  43. Hulsmann M., et al. “Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means”. Endodontic Topics1 (2005): 30-76.
  44. Garcia Filho PF., et al. “Danger zone in mandibular molars before instrumentation: an in vitro study”. Journal of Applied Oral Science4 (2003): 324-326.
  45. McRay B., et al. “A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files”. Quintessence International 45.2 (2014): 101-108.
  46. Bryant ST., et al. “Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals”. International Endodontic Journal3 (1999): 155-164.
  47. You SY., et al. “Shaping ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: A comparative study with micro-computed tomography”. Journal of Endodontics9 (2011): 1296-1300.
  48. Özer SY. “Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology Endodontology2 (2011): 244-250.
  49. Ünal GÇ., et al. “Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology Endodontology6 (2009): 886-892.
  50. Gergi R., et al. “Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments”. Journal of Endodontics8 (2014): 1223-1227.
  51. Maitin N., et al. “An ex vivo comparative analysis on shaping ability of four NiTi rotary endodontic instruments using spiral computed tomography”. Journal of Conservative Dentistry3 (2013): 219-223.
  52. Schäfer E and Vlassis M. “Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth”. International Endodontic Journal4 (2004): 239-248.
  53. El Batouty., et al. “Canal centreing ability of Mtwo, Twisted Files and Revo-S nickel-titanium rotary instruments”. Endodontic Practice Today2 (2012): 125-130.
  54. Zhu Y-Q., et al. “Reliability of two methods on measuring root canal curvature”. International Chinese Journal of Dental Research 3 (2003): 118-121.
  55. Arnheiter C., et al. “Trends in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography usage”. Oral Radiology2 (2006): 80-85.
  56. Capar ID., et al. “Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals”. Journal of Endodontics6 (2014): 852-856.
  57. Dammaschke T. “The history of direct pulp capping”. Journal of the History of Dentistry1 (2008): 9-23.
  58. Gergi R., et al. “Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Twisted Files, Pathfile-ProTaper System, and Stainless Steel Hand K-Files by Using Computed Tomography”. Journal of Endodontics5 (2010): 904-907.
  59. Al-Sudani D., et al. “A Comparison of the Canal Centering Ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe Nickel Titanium Rotary Systems”. Journal of Endodontics12 (2006): 1198-1201.
  60. Pineda F and Kuttler Y. “Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology1 (1972): 101-110.
  61. Schäfer E and Vlassis M. “Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals”. International Endodontic Journal4 (2004): 229-238.
  62. Guelzow A., et al. “Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation”. International Endodontic Journal10 (2005): 743-752.
  63. Paqué F., et al. “Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments”. International Endodontic Journal1 (2005): 8-16.
  64. Schäfer E and Schlingemann R. “Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth”. International Endodontic Journal3 (2003): 208-217.
  65. Wu MK., et al. “Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: Effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings”. Journal of Endodontics4 (2000): 210-216.
  66. Huang Z., et al. “A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the shaping ability of three thermally-treated nickel-titanium rotary file systems in curved canals”. Journal of International Medical Research1 (2019): 325-334.
  67. Shenoi PR., et al. “Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of V-Taper 2H, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM in curved canals using cone-beam computed tomography: An in vitro Study”. Indian Journal of Dental Research2 (2017): 181.
  68. Bansal S., et al. “Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of rotary systems of varying metallurgy in curved canals and its analysis using cone-beam computed tomography: An in vitro study”. Endodontology2 (2019): 158.
  69. Guillén RE., et al. “Evaluation of the WaveOne Gold and One Shape New Generation in reducing Enterococcus faecalis from root canal”. Brazilian Dental Journal3 (2018): 249-253.
  70. Zhou H., et al. “An overview of the mechanical properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments”. Endodontic Topics1 (2013): 42-54.
  71. Schäfer E and Dammaschke T. “Development and sequelae of canal transportation”. Endodontic Topics1 (2006): 75-90.
  72. Powell SE., et al. “A comparison of the effect of modified and nonmodified instrument tips on apical canal configuration”. Journal of Endodontics7 (1986): 293-300.
  73. Schäfer E., et al. “Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: A clinical study”. Journal of Endodontics6 (2004): 432-435.
  74. McSpadden JT. “Mastering Endodontic Instrumentation”. Cloudland Institute ,Chattanooga, TN, USA. Chattanooga, TN, USA: Cloudland Institute 51-52 (2007).
  75. Verma P and Love RM. “A Micro CT study of the mesiobuccal root canal morphology of the maxillary first molar tooth”. International Endodontic Journal3 (2011): 210-217.
  76. Pongione G. “Mechanical properties of endodontic instruments made with different nickel titanium alloys”. Endo 1 (2012): 41-44.

Citation

Citation: Mohamed Moftah Mohamed., et al. “Geometric Analysis of Curved Canals Prepared by HyFlex EDM Versus HyFlex CM Rotary Nickel Titanium Files: An In-Vitro Study”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 5.6 (2021): 161-171.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2021 Mohamed Moftah Mohamed., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor0.614

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is June 25, 2021.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US