Acta Scientific Computer Sciences

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 8

The Effect of Robotic Coding (Mblock - Arduino) Activities on Students' Self-efficacy and Attitudes

Hasan Güleryüz*

Department of Computer Sciences, Muş, Turkey

*Corresponding Author: Hasan Güleryüz, Department of Computer Sciences, Muş, Turkey.

Received: June 13, 2022; Published: July 08, 2022

Reprints View PDF Related Articles

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of robotic activities (mblock - arduino) on students' attitudes towards coding and their self-efficacy. Within the scope of the study, 14-week robotic coding activities were planned, followed by 43 8th grade students. Qualitative research method was used in this study. In order to collect the research data, self-proficiency perception scale for block-based programming and robotics attitude scale were applied as pre-test and post-test. For dependent samples, t-test was applied and analyses were performed. According to the findings of the study, there was a significant increase in students' positive attitudes towards coding, and students' self-efficacy for coding. Robotic coding (mblock- Arduino) trainings were given and activities were made within the scope of these trainings. 5 activities related to robotic coding were performed. mBlock- Arduino for robotic coding and Fritzing programs for circuit diagram were taught. According to the findings of the research, after teaching programming with robotic coding activities, there was a significant increase in students' positive attitudes towards coding, students' self-efficacy for coding, and students' permanent learning.


Keywords: Robotic Coding Activities; mBlock-Arduino; Robotic Coding Efficacy; Robotic Attitude

References

  1. Akpınar Y and Altun A. “The need for programming education in information society schools”. Elementary Education Online1 (2014): 1-4.
  2. Baz FC. “A comparative review on coding software for kids”. Current Research in Education1 (2018): 36-47.
  3. Bilişim Garaj Akademisi. (2016).
  4. Çankaya S., et al. “Programming education with robots: examination of students' experiences and opinions”. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry4 (2017): 428-442.
  5. Eguchi A. “Educational robotics for promoting 21st century skills”. Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems1 (2014): 5-11.
  6. Freeman A., et al. “NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2017 K–12 Edition”. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium (2017).
  7. Gerecke U and Wagner B. “The challenges and benefits of using robots in higher education”. Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing 1 (2007): 29-43.
  8. Göksoy S and Yılmaz İ. “Opinions of information technology teachers and students on robotics and coding course”. Duzce University Journal of Social Sciences Institute1 (2018): 178-196.
  9. Güleryüz H and Dilber R. “The İmpact of Robotıcs Codıng and 3D Prıntıng STEM Actıvıty on 21st Century Learner Skılls of Teacher Candıdates”. International Journal of Engineering 4 (2022): 1-18.
  10. Güleryüz H and Dilber R. “STEM Activities Made With 3D Printer The Effect On Awareness Of Teacher Candidates Regarding Its Use In Science Lessons”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research10 (2021): 336-337.
  11. Güleryüz H., et al. “Opinions of Preservice Teachers on Using 3D Printer in STEM Applications. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University”. Journal of Social Sciences2 (2019): 1-8.
  12. Güleryüz H., et al. “Opinions of Teacher Candidates on Coding Education in STEM Applications. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University”. Journal of Social Sciences1 (2020): 71-83.
  13. Güleryüz. “The effect of 3D printer and robotic coding applications on 21st century learner skills of prospective teachers, STEM awareness and STEM teacher self-efficacy”. Doctorate Thesis, Atatürk University, Institute of Educational Sciences. Erzurum (2020).
  14. Güleryüz H and Dilber R. “STEM Activities Made With Robotic Coding The Effect On Awareness Of Teacher Candidates Regarding Its Use In Science Lessons”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research11 (2021): 79-96.
  15. Kasalak I. “The Effect Of Robotic Coding Activities On Secondary School Students' Self-Efficacy Perceptions Regarding Coding And Student Experiences Regarding The Activities”. Master Thesis. Hacettepe University, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies, Ankara (2017).
  16. Kirkan B. Investigation Of The Behaviors And Views Of Gifted Secondary School Students On Creative, Reflective Thinking And Problem-Solving Skills”. In Project-Based Basic Robotics Education Processes (Unpublished Master's Thesis) (2018).
  17. Korucu A T and Taşdöndüren T. “Investigation of Secondary School Students' Self-Efficacy Perceptions Regarding Block Based Programming and Attitudes Towards Robotics”. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Journal of Education Faculty1 (2019): 44-58.
  18. Lin C., et al. “A case analysis of creative spiral instruction model and students’ creative problem solving performance in a Lego® robotics course”. In: Chang, M., Kuo, R., Kinshuk, Chen, G.-D., Hirose, M. (eds.) Edutainment 2009. LNCS 5670 (2009): 501-505.
  19. Mauch E. “Using technological innovation to improve the problem-solving skills of middle school students: Educators' experiences with the LEGO mindstorms robotic invention system”. The Clearing House 4 (2001): 211-213.
  20. Rusk N., et al. “New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation”. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17 (2008): 59-69.
  21. Şişman B., et al. “The validity and reliability study of the Turkish robotic attitude scale for secondary school students”. Ege Journal of Education1 (2018): 284-299.
  22. Yükseltürk E and Altıok S. “An investigation of the effects of programming with scratch”. British Journal of Educational Technology 3 (2016).
  23. Yang J., et al. “An exploratory study on learning attitude in computer programming for the twenty-first century”. In New media for educational change. Springer, Singapore (2018): 59-70.

Citation

Citation: Hasan Güleryüz. “The Effect of Robotic Coding (Mblock - Arduino) Activities on Students' Self-efficacy and Attitudes". Acta Scientific Computer Sciences 4.8 (2022): 02-09.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Hasan Güleryüz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In




News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is December 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"

Contact US





+91 9182824667

     info@acta-scientific.com

Creative Commons License Open Access by Acta Scientific is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Based on a work at https://actascientific.com

ff

Acta-Publications

ff

© 2021 Acta Scientific, All rights reserved.