Acta Scientific Computer Sciences

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 3

Toward a More Sustainable and Environmentally-Friendly Design Future: Applying Remote User Feedback Methods to Business Case and Commercial Product Development

Christopher R Wilkinson

University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

*Corresponding Author: Christopher R Wilkinson, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Received: December 15, 2021; Published: February 24, 2022

Abstract

Design approaches have often been accused of failing to engage with users within the design process, with user engagement seen as a high-cost activity in terms of time, logistics, and financial investment. This has the potential to compromise commercial opportunity and to adversely affect products user experience. Here, a participatory design approach is applied, remotely, to an ex- isting software product to identify the tangible benefits of adoption as reported by actual users. This acted as a valuable feed-back mechanism to help the developers understand how they could further improve their service offering and provided the opportunity to form a data-driven approach to business case development for those wishing to purchase the product. The highly transferable, sustainable, low cost, and high impact approach will enhance the user experience and commercial potential of products and services, while assisting those wishing to build stronger business cases for product manufacture and adoption. As such, it will be of interest to product manufacturers, designers, and researchers, alike.


Keywords: Socio-Technical System Design; Participatory Design; Product Design; Business Case Development; UX; User Participa- tion; Sustainable Innovation, User Feedback

References

  1. Cardoso C and Clarkson PJ. “Simulation in user-centred design: helping designers to empathise with atypical users”. Journal of Engineering Design1 (2012): 1-22.
  2. Hansen J., et al. “Attitudes to telecare among older people, professional care workers and informal carers: a preventative strategy or crisis management?” Universal Access in the Information Society2 (2007): 193-205.
  3. Grudin J. “Obstacles to User Involvement in Software Development, with Implications for CSCW”. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34 (1991): 435-452.
  4. Wilkinson C and De Angeli A. “Applying User Centred and Participatory Design Approaches to Commercial Product Development”. Journal of Design Studies 35 (2014): 614-631.
  5. Lindgaard G., et al. “User needs analysis and requirements engineering: Theory and practice”. Interacting with Computers1 (2006): 47-70.
  6. Muller M. “Participatory Design: The Third space in HCI”. In Jacko, J. and Sears, A (editions) The human computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA (2002).
  7. Meder D., et al. “Institutional core facilities: Prerequisite for breakthroughs in the life sciences”. EMBO Reports 17 (2016): 1088-1093.
  8. Informed Decision Making, Provek © (2020).
  9. Miles MB and Huberman AM. “Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook”. UK: Sage publications (1994): 56.
  10. Dorrington P., et al. “User-centered design method for the design of assistive switch devices to improve user experience, accessibility, and independence”. Journal of Usability Studies2 (2016): 66-82.
  11. Mao JY., et al. “The State of User-Centered Design Practice”. Communication of the ACM3 (2005): 105-109.
  12. Von Hippel E. “Lead users: A source of novel product concepts”. Management Science7 (1986): 791-805.
  13. Sanders E. “From User-Centred to Participatory Design Approaches”. In Design and the Social Sciences: Making Connections (Contemporary Trends Institute); Frascara, J., Edition.; Taylor and Francis; London, United Kingdom (2002): 1-9.
  14. Sharma V., et al. “Participatory design in the development of the wheelchair convoy system”. Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation 5 (2008): 1-10.
  15. Wilkinson C., et al. “Creating and Testing a Model-Driven Framework for Accessible User-Centric Design”. The Design Journal1 (2016): 69-91.
  16. Mayer R. “Build Better Products by Leveraging Feedback Effectively”. UX Booth (2019).
  17. Taffe S. “The hybrid designer/end-user: Revealing paradoxes in co-design”. Design Studies 40 (2015): 39-59.
  18. Walters A and Evans J. “Developing a Framework for Accessible User Centric Design”. of 18th International Product Development Management Conference Delft, Netherlands (2011).
  19. Wilkinson C. “Listen while the User Speaks: Harnessing User Insights to Improve Wheelchair Interaction and Design”. 2016 Set for Britain Awards, House of Commons, March 7th, London, United Kingdom (2016).
  20. Kos-Braun I., et al. “A survey of research quality in core facilities”. eLife 9 (2020): e62212.

Citation

Citation: Christopher R Wilkinson. “Toward a More Sustainable and Environmentally-Friendly Design Future: Applying Remote User Feedback Methods to Business Case and Commercial Product Development”. Acta Scientific Computer Sciences 4.3 (2022): 25-36.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Christopher R Wilkinson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In




News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is December 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"

Contact US