Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 10

Computational Three-Dimensional Modelling of the β-Subunit of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Stinging Catfish (Heteropneustes fossilis)

Ranjit Shaw1, Md. Zishan Ansari2 and Radha Chaube3*

1Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2Department of Biotechnology, School of Studies of Interdisciplinary Education and 
Research, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya (A Central University), Koni, Bilaspur, (C.G.), India
3Department of Zoology, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

*Corresponding Author: Radha Chaube, Department of Zoology, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Received: September 04, 2024; Published: September 30, 2024

Citation: Radha Chaube., et al. “Computational Three-Dimensional Modelling of the β-Subunit of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Stinging Catfish (Heteropneustes fossilis)”. Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 6.10 (2024): 52-61.

Abstract

The stinging catfish (Heteropneustes fossilis) is an important aquaculture species, which plays a pivotal role in the global fishing industry due to its rapid growth rates and high nutritional value. It is an excellent model for genomic studies due to high levels of biological conservation and fecundity rate. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a key regulator of reproductive processes in vertebrates, including catfish. It stimulates the growth and maturation of ovarian follicles in females and spermatogenesis in males. Despite its significance, its three-dimensional (3-D) structure is not found in the Protein Data Bank. To bridge this gap, we retrieved the protein sequence of the β-subunit of the FSH of H. fossilis from NCBI. The preliminary 3-D structure was generated by automated homology modeling using SWISS MODEL. This model was further refined through energy minimization using KoBaMIN. The Ramachandran plots were obtained from the RAMPAGE server. The sequences from three other model organisms, Mus musculus, Columba livia, and Homo sapiens, retrieved from NCBI, were used for a comparative physicochemical characterization using ProtParam. The functional regions were predicted using the Vector Alignment Search Tool. Finally, Hydrophobic Cluster Analysis was conducted to assess hydrophobicity patterns within the structure. A first attempt to model the 3-D structure of FSH of H. fossilis reveals that it consists of a single peptide chain and two pairs of anti-parallel β-sheets and loops. Our research has practical applications in developing targeted breeding programs and hormonal therapies to enhance reproductive efficiency in catfish aquaculture.

Keywords: Heteropneustes fossilis; Follicle-Stimulating Hormone; Protein Data Bank; Homology Modelling; Catfish Aquaculture

Introduction

Heteropneustes fossilis, commonly known as the stinging catfish, is a freshwater species native to South Asia [1]. It has a predominant presence in India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. It is renowned for its adaptability to adverse environmental conditions [2]. It lives in the muddy bottoms of weed-filled swamps and feeds on the abundant benthic fauna and detritus of decaying organic matter [3]. Economically, it plays a role in local fisheries due to its hardiness and nutritional value [4]. It has a very high level of diversity compared to other lower and higher organisms [5]. Opposed to known practices such as carp culture and tilapia culture, catfish culture has yet to become popular [6]. It has numerous advantages over the former [7]. The culture of H. fossilis can be a promising alternative for farmers since they grow very fast [8].

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a key disulfide-rich heteromeric glycoprotein consisting of a common alpha and a hormone-specific beta subunit [9]. These subunits are noncovalently linked with each other. It is secreted by the pituitary gland and regulates gonadal development and maturation [10]. It acts through a G-protein-coupled receptor on the surface of target cells to stimulate testicular and ovarian functions [11,12]. In females, it induces the maturation of ovarian follicles by targeting the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) expressed exclusively on granulosa cells [13,14].

Research so far on FSH of H. fossilis has primarily focused on its physiological roles and expression patterns within the reproductive cycle [15]. Studies have examined how FSH levels fluctuate in response to environmental and endogenous factors [16,17]. Techniques such as immunoassays and gene expression analysis have been used to study FSH activity and its genetic regulation [18,19]. However, such studies have largely been limited to the biochemical and physiological aspects of FSH [20,21]. The structural characterization of the FSH in H. fossilis has remained relatively unexplored. This lack of structural data is particularly evident in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), where no entries exist for the FSH of H. fossilis [22,23].

H. fossilis is an excellent model for genomic studies due to high levels of biological conservation and fecundity rate [24-26]. There has been rapid progress in fish genomic research due to low-cost sequencing platforms and the use of advanced computational tools for data analysis [27-30]. The absence of detailed structural information on FSH in H. fossilis represents a significant gap in the current fish genomic research [31,32]. Thus, the primary objective of our present study is to model the 3-D structure of the β-subunit of FSH in H. fossilis using advanced computational tools and techniques, including sequence retrieval [33], homology modeling [34], energy minimization [35], physicochemical characterization [36], structural alignment [37], functional region prediction [38], and hydrophobic cluster analysis [39].

The ultimate goal of FSH modeling is to predict a structure from its sequence with an accuracy that is comparable to the best results achieved experimentally. This would allow us to safely use rapidly generated in silico protein models in all contexts. Protein modeling is the only way to obtain structural information if experimental techniques fail. Many proteins are simply too large for NMR analysis and cannot be crystallized for X-ray diffraction [40]. The successful prediction and validation of the FSH structure will fill a critical knowledge gap and provide a foundation for future experimental studies.

Materials and Methods

The study design is depicted in the form of a flowchart in figure 1 in sequence.

Figure 1: The flowchart depicting the workflow of the study to
model the 3-D structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 1: The flowchart depicting the workflow of the study to model the 3-D structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Sequence retrieval

The protein sequence of the β-subunit of the FSH of H. fossilis (Accession ID: ABH20169) was retrieved from NCBI (http://ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/) in FASTA format.

Homology modeling

A fully automated homology modeling of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis was performed using SWISS-MODEL (https://swissmodel. expasy.org/). The protein sequence was submitted. Template superposition, target-template alignment, model building, and side-chain modeling were executed sequentially in a fully automated mode. The modelled structure was visualized using UCSF Chimera version 1.17.3 (https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/) [26]. QMEAN global scores were also evaluated.

Energy minimization

The energy of the original SWISS MODEL structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis was minimized using the KoBaMIN server (https://bio.tools/kobamin). The energy-minimized structure was visualized using UCSF Chimera version 1.17.3.

Superimposition of Structures

The energy-minimized structure was superimposed on the original SWISS MODEL structure. The RMSD was taken into account to analyze the superimposition. The superimposed structure was visualized using UCSF Chimera version 1.17.3.

Ramachandran plot analysis

The Ramachandran plot [27] was retrieved from the RAMPAGE server [28], and the positions of residues were analyzed for both the original and the energy-minimized structures of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Physico-chemical characterization

The protein sequences of three other model organisms, namely, Mus musculus, Columba livia, and Homo sapiens, were retrieved from NCBI. These sequences were utilized to compare the physiochemical parameters of the energy-minimized structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis using ProtParam (https://web.expasy. org/protparam/).  

Structure alignment and functional region prediction

Structural alignment of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis was achieved using the NCBI Vector Alignment Search Tool (VAST) (https://structure.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/VAST/vast.shtml). Further, the functional regions were predicted using the ConSurf server (https://consurf.tau.ac.il/consurf_index.php).

Hydrophobic cluster analysis (HCA)

The protein sequence of H. fossilis, M. musculus, C. livia, and H. sapiens was uploaded on the RPBS Web Portal (https://mobyle.rpbs. univ-paris-diderot.fr/cgi-bin/portal.py?form=HCA#forms::HCA). The hydrophobic amino acids were encircled, and their counters were joined. The resulting profile was analyzed manually following the method of [28]. When a 3-D protein structure is provided, the nine-color conservation scores are projected onto the 3-D structure of the query protein. First Glance in Jmol (http://firstglance.jmol. org) is used to visualize the colored protein structure. Scripts for visualizing the protein with ConSurf scores have been generated for several molecular visualization tools, including PyMol (http:// www.pymol.org), Chimera, Jmol (http://www.jmol.org), and RasMol. ConSurf generates several results: a sequence and multiple sequence alignment (MSA) colored by conservation scores, a text file summarizing the normalized score, assigned color, reliability estimation (for the Bayesian method), and the amino acids/ nucleotides in the respective MSA column. Additionally, ConSurf provides the sequences selected for the MSA, the constructed MSA itself, and a file showing the frequency of each amino acid/ nucleotide observed in each MSA column.

Results

Sequence retrieval

The protein sequence of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis (Accession ID: AHB20169), as retrieved from NCBI in FASTA format, is shown below:

>gi|559807285|gb|AHB20169.1| follicle stimulating hormone beta subunit [Heteropneustes fossilis] MRGVAMMLLLPMLVWAGSECKARCRLTGISITVESDECGSCITINTTA CAPGVDSSFTYPVALSCECSQCNTEITDCGAFSMQPSSCHTHAY

It is evident that the sequence length of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis is 132 amino acids.

Homology modeling

The Chimera 3-D visualization of the FSH, as shown in figure 2, showed that it consists of a single peptide chain and two pairs of anti-parallel β-sheets and loops in addition.

Figure 2: Chimera 3-D visualization of the homology model of
the 3-D structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 2: Chimera 3-D visualization of the homology model of the 3-D structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

The negative value of the QMEAN4 Z-score suggests that the 3-D structure predicted through homology modeling requires further energy minimization to enhance its quality.

Table 1: QMEAN global scores of the model 3-D structure of the
β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Table 1: QMEAN global scores of the model 3-D structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 3: Predicted local error for the 3-D model structure of
the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 3: Predicted local error for the 3-D model structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Energy minimization

The modelled structure was then energy-minimized, and as evident from figure 4, the energy-minimized structure has a different orientation as compared to the originally predicted structure.

Figure 4: Chimera 3-D visualization of the energy-minimized
structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis using the KoBaMIN
server.

Figure 4: Chimera 3-D visualization of the energy-minimized structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis using the KoBaMIN server.

Superimposition of structures

Fig. 5 shows the image obtained after the superimposition of the original structure and the structure generated after the energy minimization step of the beta-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis. Figure 5,6 show that the superimposed structure does not show many differences in the RSMD values. However, slight differences were observed in loop regions as these regions were not completely superimposed.

Figure 5: The superimposition of the original and energy-minimized structures of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 5: The superimposition of the original and energy-minimized structures of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 6: Analysis of the superimposed structure.

Figure 6: Analysis of the superimposed structure.

Ramachandran plot analysis

From the Ramachandran plots of the original and energyminimized structures (Figure 7,8), it is clear that most of the residues are present in the energetically favored region. Only a minimal number of residues are present in the allowed and outlier regions.

Figure 7: The Ramachandran plot of the original structure of
the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 7: The Ramachandran plot of the original structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Table 2: Evaluation of residues of the original structure of
β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Table 2: Evaluation of residues of the original structure of β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 8: The Ramachandran plot of the energy minimized
structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 8: The Ramachandran plot of the energy minimized structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Table 3: Evaluation of residues of the energy-minimized
3-D structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Table 3: Evaluation of residues of the energy-minimized 3-D structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Physico-chemical characterization

From the table below (Table 4), it is clear that the Physicochemical parameters of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis share a high degree of similarity with the sequences from three other model organisms, namely, Mus musculus, Columba livia, and Homo sapiens.

Table 4: Physico-chemical parameters of FSH sequences of four
model organisms.

Table 4: Physico-chemical parameters of FSH sequences of four model organisms.

Figure 9 displays the percentage composition of amino acid residues in the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis. Additionally, the comparative amino acid residues of the four organisms are shown in figure 10.

Figure 9: Plot showing the percentage of amino acid residues in
the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 9: Plot showing the percentage of amino acid residues in the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 10: The plot shows the comparative percentage of amino
acid residues in the sequence of FSH from pigeon (Columba
livia), human (Homo sapiens), mouse (Mus musculus), and catfish
(Heteropneustes fossilis).

Figure 10: The plot shows the comparative percentage of amino acid residues in the sequence of FSH from pigeon (Columba livia), human (Homo sapiens), mouse (Mus musculus), and catfish (Heteropneustes fossilis).

Structure alignment and functional region prediction

Figure 11 clearly shows that the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis shares the highest degree of similarity with the structure of folliclestimulating hormone in complex with the entire ectodomain of its receptor (PDB ID: 4AY9). Figure 12 shows the superimposed vector representation of the backbone atoms of the β-subunit of FSH in H. fossilis. The VSN view compares the similarity between its structures and that of the structure of follicle-stimulating hormone in complex with the entire ectodomain of its receptor (PDB ID: 4AY9). Figure 13 shows the sequence alignment of the β-subunit of FSH in H. fossilis and the follicle-stimulating hormone in complex with the entire ectodomain of its receptor (PDB ID: 4AY9).

For visualization purposes, the continuous conservation scores are divided into a discrete scale of nine grades. The most variable positions (Figure 14), represented by grade 1, are colored turquoise, while the intermediately conserved positions, represented by grade 5, are colored white. The most conserved positions, represented by grade 9, are colored maroon. These conservation scores are then mapped onto the protein or nucleotide sequence and displayed on the ConSurf Color-Coded Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA). Regions of the protein that align closely with known structures are highlighted in similar colors, whereas divergent regions are marked in contrasting hues. This visual distinction aids in identifying conserved motifs and functional domains in protein’s evolutionary relationships and biological functions.

Figure 15 depicts the evolutionary conservation of amino acid positions within the β-subunit of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in H. fossilis. The highly conserved residues are shaded purple and blue, while variable regions are marked in warmer colors like pink and light blue. The space-filling 3-D representation of the β-subunit of FSH in H. fossilis is shown in figure 16, using color-coded regions to illustrate the molecular surface and spatial configuration of the protein.

Figure 11: Structure alignment using Vector Alignment Search
Tool.

Figure 11: Structure alignment using Vector Alignment Search Tool.

Figure 12: Vector Superposition Network (VSN) view of the
backbone structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis
generated using the VAST.

Figure 12: Vector Superposition Network (VSN) view of the backbone structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis generated using the VAST.

Figure 13: VAST Structure alignment in Cn3D format.

Figure 13: VAST Structure alignment in Cn3D format.

Figure 14: Color variations indicate differences in properties as
shown by ConSurf.

Figure 14: Color variations indicate differences in properties as shown by ConSurf.

Figure 15: Color-coded MSA of the PDB structure of the
β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 15: Color-coded MSA of the PDB structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis.

Figure 16: A space-filling 3-D representation of the β-subunit of
FSH of H. fossilis using color-coded regions.

Figure 16: A space-filling 3-D representation of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis using color-coded regions.

Hydrophobic cluster analysis (HCA)

From figure 17, it is evident that H. fossilis has 38 hydrophobic clusters, whereas M. musculus, H. sapiens, and C. livia have 24, 27, and 31 hydrophobic clusters, respectively.

Figure 17: HCA of the FSH of Heteropneustes fossilis (A), Mus
musculus (B), Columba livia (C), and Homo sapiens (D),
respectively.

Figure 17: HCA of the FSH of Heteropneustes fossilis (A), Mus musculus (B), Columba livia (C), and Homo sapiens (D), respectively.

Discussion

Stinging catfish (Heteropneustes fossilis) is a key aquaculture species due to its growth and nutrition. It is an excellent model due to its biological conservation and high fecundity. Folliclestimulating hormone, secreted by the pituitary gland, regulates gonadal development and maturation. It acts through a G-proteincoupled receptor on the surface of target cells to stimulate testicular and ovarian functions. It also induces the maturation of ovarian follicles by targeting the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor expressed exclusively on granulosa cells in females. However, the Protein Data Bank lacks the 3-D structure of the follicle-stimulating hormone in H. fossilis.

Thus, in our study, we attempted to model the 3D structure of the β-subunit of FSH of H. fossilis, as it was not available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The preliminary structure was predicted by automated homology modeling using SWISS-MODEL (Figure 2). According to SWISS-MODEL, the QMEAN4 score is a composite score derived from a linear combination of four statistical potential terms to estimate model reliability. It ranges from 0 to 1. The pseudo-energies and Z-scores of these terms are compared with high-resolution experimental structures of similar size solved by X-ray crystallography. A Z-score represents the number of standard deviations away from the mean, with a value of zero being ideal; negative values indicate below-average quality, while positive values indicate above-average quality. An RMS Z-score should be close to 1.0, with deviations indicating potential issues.

We utilized the KoBaMIN server to minimize the energy of the original SWISS MODEL structure. The orientation of the energyminimized was observed to be slightly different from that of the original structure (Figure 4). Upon superimposition, it was found that there was no difference in RSMD between the two structures, but slight differences were observed in loop regions as these regions were not completely superimposed (Figure 5). The Ramachandran plot assessment shows most of the residues in the favored regions (Figures 7 and 8). The physio-chemical parameters studied through Protparam analysis suggested the hydrophobic nature of the energy-minimized structure (Table 4).

The accuracy of a protein model can vary significantly, even within different regions of the same protein. Inaccurate targettemplate alignments are the most frequent source of errors in models. This is especially true when the sequence similarity between the target and the template sequence drops below 40%, and manual editing of the alignment becomes a necessity to achieve a satisfactory model. Often, highly conserved core regions are modeled much more reliably than variable loop regions or surface residues. In our study, the VAST analysis (Figure 11) of our modeled structure revealed that out of 107 residues, only 50 were aligned, resulting in a 45.38% structural similarity with proteins available in the Molecular Modeling DataBase (MMDB). This analysis also indicated that no closely related protein structures were available. However, the RMSD value of 0.3 demonstrates a high degree of similarity between our structure and the structure of the folliclestimulating hormone in complex with the entire ectodomain of its receptor (PDB ID: 4AY9) [20].

Furthermore, the darker region (purple shades 7-9) identified through ConSurf server analysis shows a more conserved region. It indicates that the functional site resides at the core of this protein. These sites can serve as potential targets in drug discovery initiatives (Figure 14). Hydrophobic Cluster Analysis (HCA) is based on a two-dimensional representation of the protein sequence, in which hydrophobic amino acids congregate into clusters. HCA is often considered an approach allowing the prediction of secondary structures from the only knowledge of a protein sequence. It, however, allows combining this prediction with the comparison of 1D sequence, which makes it a powerful tool for helping the identification of remote relationships. The HCA analysis indicates the presence of hydrophobic patches on the surface of the FSH of H. fossilis making it more hydrophobic as compared to the other three sequences analyzed in our study (Figure 17).

Conclusion

Humans and fish share numerous developmental pathways, organ systems, and physiological mechanisms. Therefore, we can consider catfish an exemplary model organism to explore various studies for advancements in human welfare and agriculture. Through our pioneering attempt to model the 3-D structure of the β-subunit of the FSH from H. fossilis, previously unavailable in the PDB, we have determined that it predominantly consists of a single peptide chain, and two pairs of anti-parallel β-sheets and loops in addition. Moreover, it exhibits hydrophobic characteristics. Our findings can serve as the basis for investigating the effects of follicle-stimulating hormones across different organisms, and hold promise for developing novel drugs targeting specific sites identified through our structural predictions. Our research also highlights the potential of using catfish as a model to bridge gaps between basic research and practical applications in medicine and agriculture.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Authorship Contribution Statement

  • Ranjit Shaw: Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Data curation, Conceptualization.
  • Zishan Ansari: Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing, Visualization, Conceptualization.
  • Radha Chaube: Writing - review and editing, Supervision, Resources, Conceptualization.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Funding Sources

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available in this manuscript itself.

Bibliography

  1. Sonawani S Niazi and SI Thomas. “In Silico Study on Binding Specificity of Gonadotropins and Their Receptors: Design of a Novel and Selective Peptidomimetic for Human Follicle Stimulating Hormone Receptor”. J PLOS ONE 8 (2013): 1-14.
  2. Kumar P., et al. “Current knowledge on the biology, captive breeding and aquaculture of the brackishwater catfish, Mystus gulio (Hamilton, 1822): A review”. Aquaculture 499 (2019): 243-250.
  3. J Aizen., et al. “Experimental and computational study of inter and intra- species specificity of gonadotropins for various receptor”. Molecular and cellular Endocrinology 36 (2012): 89100.
  4. Adelakun KM., et al. “Seasonal variation in nutritional quality of Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) from Upper Jebba Basin, Nigeria”. Journal of Nutrition and Food Science 7 (2017): 5-9.
  5. H Ashkenazy., et al. “ConSurf 2010: Calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids”. Nucleic Acids Research 38 (2010): 529-533.
  6. Adan RIY. “Catfish culture in Southeast Asia”. SEAFDEC Asian Aquaculture1 (2000): 16-17.
  7. Dunham RA and Elaswad A. “Catfish biology and farming”. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences1 (2018): 305325.
  8. J Bogerd., et al. “Fish FSH receptor bind LH: How to make human FSH receptor to be fishier?” Science direct”. General and Comparative Endocrinology 142 (2005): 34-43.
  9. J Bogerd. “Ligand -selective determinants in gonadotropins receptors”. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 260-262 (2007): 144-152.
  10. Foulkes NS., et al. “Pituitary hormone FSH directs the CREM functional switch during spermatogenesis”. Nature6417 (1993): 264-267.
  11. JK Sundaray., et al. “Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) markers in fish genomic research and their acceleration via nextgeneration sequencing and computational approaches”. Aquaculture International 4 (2016): 1089-1102.
  12. J Peute., et al. “Ultrastructure and immunolabelling of gonadotrops and thyrotrops in the pituitary of the African catfish Clariaslazera”. Cell Tissue Res 238 (1984): 95-103.
  13. Xie and PE Bourne. “Structure-based systems biology for analyzing off-target binding”. Science Direct 21 (2011): 189199.
  14. MH Abel., et al. “The effect of null mutation in the Follicle Stimulating Hormone gene on Mouse Reproduction”. Endocrinology5 (2000): 1795-1803.
  15. N Bhogireddy., et al. “Inferences from the ADMET analysis of predicted inhibitors to Follicle Stimulating Hormone in the context of infertility”. Journal Biomedical Informatics15 (2013): 788-791.
  16. Lambalk CB and De Koning CH. “Interpretation of elevated FSH in the regular menstrual cycle”. Maturitas2 (1998): 215-220.
  17. R Shenoy., et al. “Proteins: Sequence to Structure and Function, Current status”. Current Protein and Peptide Science 11 (2010): 498-514.
  18. Casarini L and Crépieux P. “Molecular mechanisms of action of FSH”. Frontiers in endocrinology 10 (2019): 305.
  19. TR Kumar., et al. “Transgenic Models to Study Gonadotropin Function: The Role of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Gonadal Growth and Tumorigenesis”. Molecular Endocrinology6 (1999): 851-865.
  20. W Xing and MR Sairam. “Role of CACC-Box in the Regulation of ovine Follicle Stimulating Hormone Receptor Expression”. Biology of Reproductively 65 (2001): 1142-1149.
  21. Saha S., et al. “Behavioral and physiological toxicity thresholds of a freshwater vertebrate (Heteropneustes fossilis) and invertebrate (Branchiura sowerbyi), exposed to zinc oxide nanoparticles (nZnO): A General Unified Threshold model of Survival (GUTS)”. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology and Pharmacology 262 (2022): 109450.
  22. Reddy PB. “Study on the toxic effects of wastewater in catfish (Heteropneustes fossilis)”. Life Sciences International Research Journal2 (2018): 165-174.
  23. Paital B. “Antioxidant and oxidative stress parameters in brain of Heteropneustes fossilis under air exposure condition; role of mitochondrial electron transport chain”. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 95 (2013): 69-77.
  24. XY Wu., et al. “Early Bone mineral density decrease is associated with FSH AND LH, not estrogens”. Clinica Chimica Acta 415 (2013): 69-73.
  25. Z Liu. “A review of catfish genomics: Progress and Perspective”. Wiley Inter Science 4 (2003): 259-265.
  26. Z Yang., et al. “UCSF Chimera, Modeller and IMP: An integrated modeling system”. Journal of Structural Biology 179 (2011): 269-278.
  27. S Ramachandran., et al. “Automated minimization of steric clashes in protein structure”. Protein: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 79 (2010): 261-270.
  28. Lovell SC., et al. “Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi, psi and Cbeta deviation”. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics 50 (2002): 437-450.
  29. Gaboriaud V., et al. “Hydrophobic cluster analysis, an efficient new way to compare and analyse amino acid sequence”. FEBS Letters1 (1987): 149-155.
  30. FR Qing and HA Wayne. “Structure of Human Follicle Stimulating Hormone in complex with its receptor”. Nature 433 (2005): 269-277.
  31. Lisachov A., et al. “Emerging importance of bighead catfish (Clarias macrocephalus) and north African catfish (C. gariepinus) as a bioresource and their genomic perspective”. Aquaculture 573 (2023): 739585.
  32. Jin Y., et al. “Catfish genomic studies: progress and perspectives”. Genomics in Aquaculture (2016): 73-104.
  33. Soudy M., et al. “UniprotR: Retrieving and visualizing protein sequence and functional information from Universal Protein Resource (UniProt knowledgebase)”. Journal of Proteomics 213 (2020): 103613.
  34. Schwede T., et al. “SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server”. Nucleic Acids Research13 (2003): 3381-3385.
  35. Terp GE., et al. “Structural differences of matrix metalloproteinases. Homology modeling and energy minimization of enzyme-substrate complexes”. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics6 (2000): 933-946.
  36. Santhoshkumar R and Yusuf A. “In silico structural modeling and analysis of physicochemical properties of curcumin synthase (CURS1, CURS2, and CURS3) proteins of Curcuma longa”. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology1 (2020): 24.
  37. Zhu J and Weng Z. “FAST: a novel protein structure alignment algorithm”. PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics3 (2005): 618-627.
  38. Glaser F., et al. “ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information”. Bioinformatics1 (2003): 163-164.
  39. Woodcock S., et al. “Detection of secondary structure elements in proteins by hydrophobic cluster analysis”. Protein Engineering, Design and Selection7 (1992): 629-635.
  40. Whittig LD and Allardice WR. “X-ray diffraction techniques”. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods 5 (1986): 331-362.

Copyright: © 2024 Radha Chaube., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.