Mohamed Hasif Ganimattoullah¹*, Monalisha Debbarma² Babita Kumari³, Rakesh Kumar³, Afreed Muhammed N V⁴, Devamugilan Coumaressane⁴, Jayabharathi Govindan Manivannan⁵ and Tolly Bora⁶

¹Department of Veterinary Physiology, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneshwar, India
²Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneshwar, India
³Animal Physiology Division, National Dairy Research Institute , Karnal ,India
⁴Depatment of Veterinary Physiology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bangalore
⁵Department of Physiology and Climatology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly
⁶College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Selesih, Aizawl

*Corresponding Author: Mohamed Hasif Ganimattoullah, Department of Veterinary Physiology, Institute of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Odisha, India.

Received: July 09, 2024; Published: July 18, 2024

Abstract

The heart, a vital organ responsible for pumping blood throughout the body, exhibits a remarkable interplay between its anatomical structure and physiological processes. Understanding this relationship is crucial for comprehending cardiac function and developing effective treatments for cardiovascular diseases. The myocardium, composed of cardiomyocytes, features specialized regions such as the atria, ventricles, septa, and valves, ensuring efficient blood flow and preventing regurgitation. Comparative anatomy reveals significant variations among species, reflecting adaptations to diverse metabolic demands and environmental conditions. Mammals and birds possess four-chambered hearts optimized for high metabolic rates, while reptiles, amphibians, and fish have simpler yet effective cardiac structures suited to their unique ecological niches. Physiologically, the heart's function is governed by a sophisticated conduction system, excitation-contraction coupling, and the cardiac cycle, all of which are intricately linked to its anatomical features. The Frank-Starling law exemplifies the heart's ability to adjust its contraction force based on blood volume, highlighting the dynamic relationship between structure and function. This interrelationship is evident across different species, showcasing evolutionary adaptations that optimize cardiac performance. Understanding the anatomy and physiology of heart muscle function has significant clinical implications. Insights into structural and functional disruptions in conditions like myocardial infarction, heart failure, and arrhythmias can inform targeted therapeutic interventions. Future research directions include comparative genomics, evolutionary studies of conduction systems, cardiac regeneration, environmental impacts on cardiac function, the microbiome's role, innovative imaging techniques, cardiovascular adaptations in extreme environments, integrative computational models, heart aging, and ethnoveterinary medicine. Exploring these areas can deepen our understanding of cardiac function and lead to novel strategies for cardiovascular health across species, including humans.

 Keywords: Heart Anatomy; Cardiac Physiology; Comparative Genomics; Cardiac Conduction System and Cardiac Regeneration

References

1. Bers DM. “Cardiac excitation-contraction coupling”. Nature6868 (2002): 198-205.
2. Borlaug BA and Paulus W J. “Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment”. European Heart Journal6 (2011): 670-679.
3. Feher J. “Quantitative Human Physiology: An Introduction”. Academic Press (2017).
4. Katz AM. “Physiology of the Heart”. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (2010).
5. Klabunde R E. “Cardiovascular Physiology Concepts”. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (2021).
6. Mohrman D E and Heller L J. “Cardiovascular Physiology”. McGraw-Hill Education (2018).
7. Opie LH. “Heart Physiology: From Cell to Circulation”. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (2004).
8. Saffitz J E. “Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and abnormalities of cell-to-cell coupling”. Heart Rhythm4 (2005): 304-306.
9. Silverthorn DU. “Human Physiology: An Integrated Approach”. Pearson (2016).
10. Thygesen K., et al. “Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction”. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 18 (2018): 2231-2264.
11. Farrell A P. “From hagfish to tuna: A perspective on cardiac function in fish”. Physiological Zoology5 (1991): 1137-1164.
12. Grubb BR. “Allometric relations of cardiovascular function in birds”. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 4 (1983): R567-R572.
13. Jensen B., et al. “Evolution and development of the building plan of the vertebrate heart”. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms2 (2014): 183-194.
14. Lillywhite HB and Henderson R W. “Handbook of Physiology, Comparative Biology of the Heart”. CRC Press (2014).
15. Wells K D. “The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians”. University of Chicago Press (2007).

Citation

Citation: Mohamed Hasif Ganimattoullah., et al. “Interconnected Dynamics: The Interrelationship Between Anatomy and Physiology in Heart Muscle". Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 6.8 (2024): 61-67.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Mohamed Hasif Ganimattoullah., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.