Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences (ISSN: 2582-3183)

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 5

Performance Analysis in Cattle Before the use of Anabolics as Growth Promoters

Moreno Gómez Eligio R1, Mariana Castellanos Mora2, Ruiz Castañeda Martin1, Rodríguez Flores José R3, Rubén Rosales Ramírez1, Alejandro Sierra Rizo1, Grageola Núñez Fernando4 and Mireles Flores Salvador1*

1Department of Animal Production, University Center for Biological and Agricultural Sciences, University of Guadalajara
2Veterinary Medicine Intern, University Center for Biological and Agricultural Sciences, University of Guadalajara
3Department of Veterinary Medicine, University Center for Biological and Agricultural Sciences, University of Guadalajara
4Academic Unit of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Mexico

*Corresponding Author: Mireles Flores Salvador, Academic Unit of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Mexico.

Received: March 18, 2024Published: April 22, 2024


The administration of anabolics for the performance of bovine animals was 1 ml per 90 kg of body weight every 30 days. The block design evaluated the number of animals by administering Anabolic ST (A) and Boldemax (B). For the first block, group A was the animals with an approximate weight of 354 (+-41) kg, group A was 18 heads and group B was 24 heads, and each animal was weighed for 41 days. For block two, animals weighing approximately 479.5 (+- 26.9) kg. Group A consisted of 23 head and group B consisted of 23 head and each animal was weighed for 39 days. For block three with animals weighing approximately 524 (+-6.4) kg. Where group A will have 27 head and group B 13 head and each animal will be weighed for 55 days. The statistical analyses of the results were analyzed using the student's t test for the following parameters: feed intake, mean total weight gain, feed conversion. The ANOVA test was performed to determine the statistical significance between means, and a Tukey test (P < 0.05). There was a statistical difference between treatments (P < 0.05) of the three experimental blocks with the anabolic Bodlemax in the total mean gain in kg (160, 237, 68.6 versus 137, 187, 61.4); Feed conversion kg. (3.92, 6.34, 1.76, 1.8 versus 3.96, 6.2, 1.72), of the blocks that consumed this anabolic. It is concluded that there is a significant difference between GMTP of animals with a confidence level of 95%. that the anabolic Boldemax was applied compared to the Anabolic ST and there is a better feed efficiency due to the cost when administering Boldemax in the treatments evaluated.

Keywords: Feed Efficiency; Beef Cattle; Anabolics; Bodelmax®


  1. ABBOT D. “Use of Zeranol and Boldenone in Fattening Cattle. Technical University of Babahoyo, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences”. School of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics (2021).
  2. ALTAVILLA D., et al. “The phytoestrogen α-zearalenol reverses endothelial dysfunction induced by oophorectomy in rats”. Laboratory Investigation 81 (2001): 125-132.
  3. ANABOLIC ST MG. “Product Description”. Australian Tech (2022).
  4. “Use of anabolics in animal production”. Livestock environment (1999).
  5. BAVERA G. “Growth Promoters and Metabolism Modifiers”. Argentinian Animal Production Site. Argentina (2002). 1-4.
  6. BOLDEMAX® “Anabolic boldenone undecylinate for animals. Agrovet Market Animal Health.
  7. BUSBOOM and Karen. “Verification of the RIDASCREEN® RACTOPAMIN KIT for its application in the detection of the anabolic (RACTOPAMINE) present in meat (2000).
  8. “Boldemax A.P”. Product Description (2022).
  9. DUCKETT SK., et al. “Effect of anabolic implants on beef intramuscular lipid content”. Journal of Animal Science5 (1999): 1100-1104.
  10. CAICEDO A. “Situation and prospects of the production of curíes in the Department of Nariño”. 1st ed. Nariño, Colombia EditIICA-OAS (1995): 78-120.
  11. GUIROY PJ., et al. “The effects of implant strategy on finished body weight of beef cattle”. Journal of Animal Science7 (2002): 1791-1800.
  12. GUTIERREZ AJP and VACA RR. “Evaluation of two anabolic implants combined with two biostimulants in the fattening of steers at Finca Santa Elisa, El Paraíso, Honduras”. Department of Agricultural Science and Production (2012).
  13. HERRERA J and Paul D. “Anabolics in the Development and Growth of Crossed Bulls for Fattening in the Province of Santo Domingo de los Tsachilas.
  14. “National Consumer Price Index. INPC (2022).
  15. KHAN B. “The environmental fate of anabolic steroid trenbolone acetate”.  Purdue University ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (2009).
  16. NÚÑEZ R. “Productive behavior of criollo bulls for meat with the application of an anabolic (Zeranol) and immunocastration (GnRH analogue) in the district of Huicungo, province of Mariscal Cáceres. National University of San Martín. Peru (2019).
  17. “Anabolic ST. Stanozolol (2022).
  18. SARTORI R., et al. “Ovarian structures and circulating steroids in heifers and lactating cows in summer and lactating and dry cows in Winter”. Journal of Dairy Science 11 (2002): 2813-2822.
  19. “Agri-food and fisheries information service. availability and consumption of beef”. SAGARPA/SIAP/ASERCA, SE and SHCP/SAT/AGA (2022).
  20. SANCHEZ and SANCHEZ. “The use of anabolics in animal production. BM editors (2000).
  21. SMITH ZK and Johnson BJ. “Mechanisms of steroidal implants to improve beef cattle growth: a review”. Journal of Applied Animal Research (2019): 133-141.
  22. SORRIBAS CE., et al. “Note on anabolic effect duration of zeranol implants and estanozolol implants in bovines”. Investigacion Agraria. Produccion y Sanidad Animales (Spain) (1987).
  23. STELLA R., et al. “Metabolomics analysis of liver reveals profile disruption in bovines upon steroid treatment”. Metabolomics80 (2017).
  24. ULIBARRY P. “Use of anabolics in livestock production and their effects on people's health” (2017).
  25. VALLADARES CB., et al. “Implications of the use of clenbuterol hydrochloride in livestock production”. Revista Electronica de Veterinaria2 (2015).


Citation: Mireles Flores Salvador., et al. “Performance Analysis in Cattle Before the use of Anabolics as Growth Promoters". Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 6.5 (2024): 12-19.


Copyright: © 2024 Mireles Flores Salvador., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.008

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is July 30, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US