Moreno Gómez Eligio R1, Mariana Castellanos Mora2, Ruiz Castañeda Martin1, Rodríguez Flores José R3, Rubén Rosales Ramírez1, Alejandro Sierra Rizo1, Grageola Núñez Fernando4 and Mireles Flores Salvador1*
1Department of Animal Production, University Center for Biological and Agricultural Sciences, University of Guadalajara
2Veterinary Medicine Intern, University Center for Biological and Agricultural Sciences, University of Guadalajara
3Department of Veterinary Medicine, University Center for Biological and Agricultural Sciences, University of Guadalajara
4Academic Unit of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Mexico
*Corresponding Author: Mireles Flores Salvador, Academic Unit of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Mexico.
Received: March 18, 2024Published: April 22, 2024
The administration of anabolics for the performance of bovine animals was 1 ml per 90 kg of body weight every 30 days. The block design evaluated the number of animals by administering Anabolic ST (A) and Boldemax (B). For the first block, group A was the animals with an approximate weight of 354 (+-41) kg, group A was 18 heads and group B was 24 heads, and each animal was weighed for 41 days. For block two, animals weighing approximately 479.5 (+- 26.9) kg. Group A consisted of 23 head and group B consisted of 23 head and each animal was weighed for 39 days. For block three with animals weighing approximately 524 (+-6.4) kg. Where group A will have 27 head and group B 13 head and each animal will be weighed for 55 days. The statistical analyses of the results were analyzed using the student's t test for the following parameters: feed intake, mean total weight gain, feed conversion. The ANOVA test was performed to determine the statistical significance between means, and a Tukey test (P < 0.05). There was a statistical difference between treatments (P < 0.05) of the three experimental blocks with the anabolic Bodlemax in the total mean gain in kg (160, 237, 68.6 versus 137, 187, 61.4); Feed conversion kg. (3.92, 6.34, 1.76, 1.8 versus 3.96, 6.2, 1.72), of the blocks that consumed this anabolic. It is concluded that there is a significant difference between GMTP of animals with a confidence level of 95%. that the anabolic Boldemax was applied compared to the Anabolic ST and there is a better feed efficiency due to the cost when administering Boldemax in the treatments evaluated.
Keywords: Feed Efficiency; Beef Cattle; Anabolics; Bodelmax®
Citation: Mireles Flores Salvador., et al. “Performance Analysis in Cattle Before the use of Anabolics as Growth Promoters". Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 6.5 (2024): 12-19.
Copyright: © 2024 Mireles Flores Salvador., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.