Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences (ISSN: 2582-3183)

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 1

Assessing the Zoonotic Risk of Bovine Brucellosis Transmission in Gauteng Abattoirs

Nyasha Munjeri Gauteng* and Cheryl McCrindle

Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, University of Pretoria School of Health Sciences a Public Health

*Corresponding Author: Nyasha Munjeri Gauteng, Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, University of Pretoria School of Health Sciences a Public Health.

Received: September 04, 2023 Published: December 08, 2023

Abstract

Abattoir workers could be exposed to bovine brucellosis when positive animals with known and unknown status are sent for slaughter. In veterinary science risk analysis consists of hazard characterisation, risk assessment, risk mitigation and risk communication. Occupational risk assessment is done by multiplying the likelihood by the magnitude or consequences of exposure. While the risk of zoonotic transmission during slaughter has been recognised, the likelihood of exposure at Gauteng abattoirs was not known.

The study estimated of the sero-prevalence of brucellosis in cattle in Gauteng. The risk of zoonotic transmission at different critical control points along the slaughter line was analysed using the risk matrix suggested for occupational health.

This was a cross-sectional study using mixed methods to include desk review. Sero-prevalence in cows was calculated from secondary data of 62 471 cows from mixed farming sectors from the Gauteng province. The blood samples were tested as they were collected over a period of 32 months. The proportion of cattle presented for slaughter without being tested for brucellosis was calculated from information from the abattoirs during the survey. Risk of occupational exposure was assessed using Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) method.

Sero-prevalence in cows was calculated to be 1.12% (n = 700) from secondary data of 62 471 mixed cattle from both communal and commercial farming sectors. An average of 43 020 cows passed through the 21 abattoirs in Gauteng per month. Eighty percent (n = 34 416) of these animals are presented without being tested for brucellosis.

Keywords: Brucellosis; Risk Assessment; HACCP; CCP; Occupational Exposure

References

  1. Ali S., et al. “Sero-prevalence of Brucella abortus among dairy cattle and buffaloes in Pothohar plateau, Pakistan”. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 4 (2013): 1041-1046.
  2. Amegashie EA., et al. “Sero-prevalence and occupational risk factors for brucella infection among slaughterhouse workers and butchers in Kumasi, Ghana”. Journal of Epidemiological Research 1 (2016): 17.
  3. Arvas G., et al. “The prevalence of brucellosis in adults in Northeastern region of Turkey”. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology3 (2013): 262-264.
  4. Aworh MK., et al. “Human brucellosis: Seroprevalence and associated exposure factors among abattoir workers in Abuja, Nigeria-2011”. The Pan African Medical Journal 16 (2013): 103.
  5. Bamaiyi P. “Prevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in man and domestic animals: A review”. International Journal of One Health (2016).
  6. Banjo T., et al. “Occupational health hazards among abattoir workers in Abeokuta”. Academia Arena 10 (2013): 29-36.
  7. Bashaka W. “Knowledge, attitudes and practices of women on local control measures for brucellosis in Kilosa district, Morogoro-Tanzania (2015).
  8. Blagojevic B and Antic D. “Assessment of potential contribution of official meat inspection and abattoir process hygiene to biological safety assurance of final beef and pork carcasses”. Food Control 1 (2014): 174-182.
  9. Cook EAJ., et al. “Working conditions and public health risks in slaughterhouses in western Kenya”. BMC Public Health1 (2017): 14.
  10. Corbel MJ. “Brucellosis in humans and animals”. Geneva. World Health Organisation (2006).
  11. Dastjerdi MZ., et al. “Epidemiological features of human brucellosis in central Iran, 2006-2011”. Public Health12 (2012): 1058-1062.
  12. Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries. Republic of South Africa. VPN. 11/2007-1 standard for ante mortem and post-mortem inspection and hygiene control at red meat establishments (2007).
  13. Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries. Republic of South Africa. Meat inspectors’ manual, red meat (2007).
  14. Esmaeili S., et al. “Seroprevalence of brucellosis, leptospirosis, and Q fever among butchers and slaughterhouse workers in South-eastern Iran”. PloS One1 (2016): e0144953.
  15. Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development. Bovine brucellosis manual (2016).
  16. Godfroid J., et al. “A “One health” surveillance and control of brucellosis in developing countries: Moving away from improvisation”. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 3 (2013): 241-248.
  17. Govender R and Genis E. “Advancing the hygiene management system at red meat abattoirs in Gauteng”. Journal for New Generation Sciences 1 (2010): 64-79.
  18. Govender R., et al. “Managing meat safety at South African abattoirs”. Int J Biol Vet Agr Food Eng 7 (2013): 124-129.
  19. Govender R. “A hazard analysis methodology for the South African abattoir hygiene management system”. British Food Journal 12 (2014): 2026-2047.
  20. Govender R. “Continual improvement within South African abattoir hygiene management systems”. The TQM Journal4 (2012): 310-325.
  21. Hadush A and Pal M. “Brucellosis-an infectious re-emerging bacterial zoonosis of global importance”. International Journal of Livestock Research 1 (2013): 28-34.
  22. Haileselassie M., et al. “Food safety knowledge and practices of abattoir and butchery shops and the microbial profile of meat in Mekelle city, Ethiopia”. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine5 (2013): 407-412.
  23. Havas KA. “A systemic review of brucellosis in the Kakheti region of the country of Georgia: an evaluation of the disease ecology, risk factors and suggestions for disease control (2011).
  24. Islam MA., et al. “A review of brucella seroprevalence among humans and animals in Bangladesh with special emphasis on epidemiology, risk factors and control opportunities”. Veterinary Microbiology 3 (2013): 317-326.
  25. Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission. Code of hygienic practice for meat CAC/RCP 58 (2005).
  26. Knoll S., et al. “The Sino-Brazilian beef supply chain: Mapping and risk detection”. British Food Journal 1 (2017): 164-180.
  27. Lytras T., et al. “Incidence patterns and occupational risk factors of human brucellosis in Greece, 2004-2015”. The International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 806 (2016): 221-226.v
  28. Magwedere K., et al. “Challenges of sanitary compliance related to trade in products of animal origin in Southern Africa”. Italian Journal of Food Safety3 (2015): 5114.
  29. Manoto SN. “Vaccination and testing for Brucella abortus in the Northwest province from 2009-2013 (2016).
  30. Mohamed E and Mona S. “Sero-prevalence of brucellosis among abattoir house and butcher shops workers in Assiut city”. SCVMJ 18 (2013): 2.
  31. Mufinda FC., et al. “Prevalence and factors associated with human brucellosis in livestock professionals”. Rev Saude Publica (2017): 51.
  32. Mufinda FC., et al. “Prevalence and factors associated with cattle brucellosis in animal herds of the Namibe province in Angola”. Alexandria Journal for Veterinary Sciences1 (2015).
  33. Nabukenya I., et al. “Survey of brucella infection and malaria among abattoir workers in Kampala and Mbarara districts, Uganda”. BMC Public Health1 (2013): 901.
  34. Nasinyama G., et al. “Brucella sero-prevalence and modified risk factors among predisposed cattle keepers and consumers of unpasteurised milk Mbarara and Kampala, Uganda”. African Health Sciences 4 (2014): 790-796.
  35. Cooperation between the codex alimentarius commission and the OIE on food safety throughout the food chain - OIE working group on animal production food safety (2002).
  36. Terrestrial animal health code (2017).
  37. Osoro EM., et al. “Strong association between human and animal brucella seropositivity in a linked study in Kenya, 2012–2013”. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2 (2015): 224-231.
  38. Qekwana DN., et al. “Assessment of the occupational health and food safety risks associated with the traditional slaughter and consumption of goats in Gauteng, South Africa”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health4 (2017): 420.
  39. Qekwana DN. “Occupational health and food safety risks associated with traditional slaughter practices of goats in Gauteng, South Africa (2012).
  40. Red meat and abattoir association. HMS and HACCP for the abattoir industry. Learner’s guide”. Pretoria (2011): 175.
  41. Republic of South Africa. Animal Health Act of 2002. Government Gazette (2002).
  42. Republic of South Africa. National Health Act of 2003. Government Gazette (2003).
  43. Republic of South Africa. National Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1993. Government Gazette (1993).
  44. Tabibi R., et al. “Occupational exposure to zoonotic agents among agricultural workers in Lombardy region, Northern Italy”. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine4 (2013).
  45. Tsegay A., et al. “Seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in abattoir workers at Debre zeit and Modjo export abattoir, Central Ethiopia”. BMC Infectious Diseases1 (2017): 101.

Citation

Citation: Nyasha Munjeri Gauteng and Cheryl McCrindle. “Assessing the Zoonotic Risk of Bovine Brucellosis Transmission in Gauteng Abattoirs".Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 6.1 (2024): 20-29.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Nyasha Munjeri Gauteng and Cheryl McCrindle. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.008

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is November 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US