Kanaka KK¹, Nidhi Sukhija¹, Jayakumar Sivalingam²*, Rangasai Chandra Goli¹, Pallavi Rathi¹, Komal Jaglan³ and Chethan Raj⁴

¹ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India
²ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Hyderabad, India
³Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India
⁴ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, UP

*Corresponding Author: Jayakumar Sivalingam, ICAR- Directorate of Poultry Research, Hyderabad, India.

Received: May 23, 2023; Published: June 07, 2023

Abstract

Deep learning has emerged as a powerful tool in genomics, utilizing neural networks to uncover complex patterns in large datasets. This review explores the application of deep learning in genomics, focusing on supervised and unsupervised learning tasks. The process involves training models with appropriate evaluation metrics and curated datasets to optimize performance. Balancing training data and model flexibility is crucial to avoid underfitting or overfitting. Deep learning models, with their high capacity and flexibility, outperform traditional techniques like logistic regression and support vector machines in genomics. Various applications of deep learning in genomics are includes predicting protein sequence specificity, determining cis-regulatory elements, analyzing splicing regulation and gene expression, and predicting genomic variants. Deep learning proves particularly effective in studying functional genomics and regulatory elements, leveraging techniques from computer vision and natural language processing. Overall, deep learning shows promise in advancing genomics research and understanding complex biological processes.

Keywords: Deep Learning; Supervised Model; Unsupervised Model; Genomics

References

1. Telenti A., et al. “Deep learning of genomic variation and regulatory network data”. Human Molecular Genetics 27 (2018): R63-R71.
2. Libbrecht M W and Noble W S. “Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics”. Nature Reviews Genetics 16 (2015): 321-332.
3. Vincent P., et al. “Stacked denoising autoencoders: learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion”. Journal of Machine Learning Research 11 (2010): 3371-3408.
4. Eraslan G., et al. “Single-cell RNA-seq denoising using a deep count autoencoder”. Nature Communication 10 (2019): 390.
5. Khodabandelou G., et al. “Genome Functional Annotation using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks”. bioRxiv 330308 (2020).
6. Park Y and Kellis M. “Deep learning for regulatory genomics”. Nature Biotechnology 33 (2015): 825-826.
7. Zhou J and Troyanskaya O G. “Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model”. Nature Methods 12 (2015): 931-934.
8. Zou J., et al. “A primer on deep learning in genomics”. Nature Genetics 1 (2019): 12-18.
9. Yue T and Wang H. “Deep learning for genomics: A concise overview”. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.00810 (2018).
10. Kelley DR., et al. “Basset: learning the regulatory code of the accessible genome with deep convolutional neural networks”. Genome Research 26 (2016): 990-999.
11. Zeng W., et al. “Prediction of enhancer-promoter interactions via natural language processing”. BMC Genomics 19 (2018): 84.
12. Shaham U., et al. “Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks”. Bioinformatics 33 (2017): 2539-2546.
13. Angermueller C., et al. “Deep CpG: accurate prediction of single-cell DNA methylation states using deep learning”. Genome Biology 18 (2017): 67.
14. Kanaka, K. K., et. al. On the concepts and measures of diversity in the genomics era. Current Plant Biology, 33 (2023):100278.
15. Kanaka, K. K., et. al. Cloning, characterisation and expression of the SERPINB14 gene, and association of promoter polymorphisms with egg quality traits in layer chicken. British Poultry Science, 62(6) (2021): 783-794.
16. Kanaka, K. K.,  et. al. Development of protocol for production of primary antibody against ovalbumin protein in chicken for detection of the protein through western blotting. Journal of Animal Research, 9(6) (2019): 849-853.
17. Murugesan, K. D., et. al. Profiling and integrated analysis of whole-transcriptome changes in uterine caruncles of pregnant and non-pregnant buffaloes. Genomics, 113(4)(2021): 2338-2349.
18. Jaglan, K., et. al. Impact of non-genetic factors on clinical mastitis incidence in Murrah buffaloes  (2022).
19. Jaglan, K., et. al. Genomic clues of association between clinical mastitis and SNPs identified by ddRAD sequencing in Murrah buffaloes. Animal Biotechnology (2023):1-9.
20. GEORGE, L., et. al. Genetic improvement of economic traits in Murrah buffalo using significant SNPs from genome wide association study (2023).
21. Kanaka KK.,et al. “Network analysis of beta casomorphin-7 revealed genes and pathways associated with human diseases". Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 5.3 (2023): 31-46.
22. Nidhi Sukhija., et al. “Epitope tailored vaccine construct for goat milk allergy". Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 5.3 (2023): 23-30.

Citation

Citation: Jayakumar Sivalingam., et al. “Deep Learning in Neural Networks and their Application in Genomics"Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 5.7 (2023): 21-26.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Jayakumar Sivalingam., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.