Acta Scientific Agriculture (ASAG)(ISSN: 2581-365X)

Case Review Volume 5 Issue 6

The Power of AI in Fish Feeding and Behavior Management: A Comprehensive Review

Agniva Pradhan*

Department of Fish Nutrition, F.F.Sc, WBUAFS, Kolkata, India

*Corresponding Author: Agniva Pradhan, Department of Fish Nutrition, F.F.Sc, WBUAFS, Kolkata, India.

Received: May 08, 2023; Published: May 31, 2023


In this study, the use of computer vision and artificial intelligence technology is examined as a means of improving the efficacy and sustainability of fish feeding in aquaculture. The proposed approach employs machine learning techniques to estimate feeding requirements and optimise feeding schedules, while image analysis is employed to track fish behaviours and appetite. The method aims to increase the growth and health of fish while reducing waste and the environmental impact of aquaculture operations.

Keywords: Fish Feeding; Aquaculture; Sustainability; Optimization; Machine Learning; Artificial Intelligence; Computer Vision


  1. Pinkiewicz TH., et al. “A computer vision system to analyse the swimming behaviour of farmed fish in commercial aquaculture facilities: a case study using cage-held Atlantic salmon”. Aquacultural Engineering 45 (2011): 20-27.
  2. Volkoff H and Peter RE. “Feeding behavior of fish and its control”. Zebrafish 3 (2006): 131.
  3. Rønnestad I., et al. “Feeding behaviour and digestive physiology in larval fish: current knowledge, and gaps and bottlenecks in research”. Reviews in Aquaculture 5 (2013): S59-S98.
  4. Yokobori E., et al. “Neuropeptide Y stimulates food intake in the Zebrafish, Danio rerio”. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 24 (2012): 766-773.
  5. Nakamachi T., et al. “Regulation by orexin of feeding behaviour and locomotor activity in the goldfish”. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 18 (2006): 290-297.
  6. Kiris GA., et al. “Stimulatory effects of neuropeptide Y on food intake and growth of Oreochromis niloticus”. Aquaculture 264 (2007): 383-389.
  7. Cho CY and Kaushik SJ. “Nutritional energetics in fish: energy and protein utilization in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri)”. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 61 (1990): 132.
  8. Huang CH and Huang SL. “Effect of dietary vitamin E on growth, tissue lipid peroxidation, and liver glutathione level of juvenile hybrid tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus x O. aureus, fed oxidized oil”. Aquaculture 237 (2004): 381-389.
  9. Jonassen TM., et al. “Interaction of temperature and photoperiod on growth of Atlantic halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus L”. Aquaculture Research 31 (2001): 219-227.
  10. Biswas AK and Takeuchi T. “Effects of photoperiod and feeding interval on food intake and growth rate of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L”. Fisheries Science 69 (2003): 1010-1016.
  11. Takahashi A., et al. “Possible involvement of melanin concentrating hormone in food intake in a teleost fish, barfin flounder”. Peptides 25 (2004): 1613-1622.
  12. Saberioon M., et al. “Application of machine vision systems in aquaculture with emphasis on fish: state-of-the-art and key issues”. Rev Aquaculture 9 (2017): 369-387.
  13. Zhou C., et al. “Intelligent feeding control methods in aquaculture with an emphasis on fish: a review”. Reviews in Aquaculture 10 (2018): 975-993.
  14. Bégout M L., et al. “Tools for studying the behaviour of farmed fish”. Aquaculture and Behavior., (2012). Tools for studying the behavior of farmed fish, in: Felicity Huntingford, Malcolm Jobling, Sunil Kadri (Eds), Aquaculture and Behavior. Blackwell Publishing Ltd (2012): 65-86.
  15. Sadoul B., et al. “A new method for measuring group behaviours of fish shoals from recorded videos taken in near aquaculture conditions”. Aquaculture 430 (2014): 179-187. 
  16. Saberioon M., et al. “Application of machine vision systems in aquaculture with emphasis on fish: state-of-the-art and key issues”. Aquaculture 9 (2017): 369-387.
  17. Papadakis VM., et al. “A computer-vision system and methodology for the analysis of fish behavior”. Aquaculture Engineering 46 (2012): 53-59.
  18. Al-Jubouri Q., et al. “An automated vision system for measurement of zebrafish length using low-cost orthogonal web cameras”. Aquacultural Engineering 78 (2017): 155-162.
  19. Hu J., et al. “Fish species classification by color, texture and multi-class support vector machine using computer vision”. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 88 (2012): 133-140.
  20. Brown GE and Chivers DP. “The dynamic nature of antipredator behavior: prey fish integrate threat-sensitive antipredator responses within background levels of predation risk”. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61 (2006): 9-16.
  21. Balaban MO., et al. “Prediction of the weight of Alaskan pollock using image analysis”. Journal of Food Science 75 (2010a): E552-E556.
  22. Zion B., et al. “Sorting fish by computer vision”. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 23 (1999): 175-187.
  23. Loo JL. “The use of vision in a sustainable aquaculture feeding system”. Research Journal of Applied Sciences Engineering and Technology 6 (2013): 3658-3669.
  24. Papadakis VM., et al. “A computer-vision system and methodology for the analysis of fish behavior”. Aquacultural Engineering 46 (2012): 53-59.
  25. Kane AS., et al. “A video-based movement analysis system to quantify behavioral stress responses of fish”. Water Research 38 (2004): 3993- 4001.
  26. Pautsina A., et al. “Infrared reflection system for indoor 3D tracking of fish”. Aquacultural Engineering 69 (2015): 7-17.
  27. Qian Z., et al. “An effective and robust method for tracking multiple fish in video image based on fish head detection”. BMC Bioinformatics 17 (2016).
  28. Marti-Puig P., et al. “Quantitatively scoring behavior from video-recorded, long-lasting fish trajectories”. Environmental Modelling and Software 106 (2018): 68-76.
  29. Saberioon MM and Cisar P. “Automated mult iple fish tracking in three -Dimension using a Structured Light Sensor”. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 121 (2016): 215-221.
  30. Delcourt J., et al. “A video multitracking system for quantification of individual behavior in a large fish shoal: Advantages and limits”. Behavior Research Methods 41 (2009): 228-235.
  31. Costa C., et al. “A dual camera system for counting and sizing Northern Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus; Linnaeus, 1758) stock, during transfer to aquaculture cages, with a semi automatic Artificial Neural Network tool”. Aquaculture 291 (2009): 161-167.
  32. Hockaday S., et al. “Using truss networks to estimate the biomass of Oreochromis niloticus, and to investigate shape characteristics”. Journal of Fish Biology 57 (2000): 981-1000.
  33. Zion B., et al. “Social facilitation of acoustic training in the Common Carp Cyprinus carpio (L.)”. Behaviour 144 (2007b): 611-630.
  34. Harvey E., et al. “The accuracy and precision of underwater measurements of length and maximum body depth of southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) with a stereo-video camera system”. Fisheries Research 63 (2003): 315-326.
  35. Torisawa S., et al. “A digital stereo-video camera system for three-dimensional monitoring of free-swimming Pacific bluefin tuna, Thunnus orientalis, cultured in a net cage”. Aquatic Living Resources 24 (2011): 107-112.
  36. Costa C., et al. “Extracting fish size using dual underwater cameras”. Aquacultural Engineering 35 (2006): 218-227.
  37. Harvey ES and Shortis MR. “Calibration stability of an underwater stereo-video system: implications for measurement accuracy and precision”. Marine Technology Society Journal 32 (1998): 3-17.
  38. Alzubi HS., et al. “An intelligent behavior-based fish feeding system”. IEEE (2016).
  39. Hung C., et al. “A highly sensitive underwater video system for use in turbid aquaculture ponds”. Scientific Report 6 (2016).
  40. Zhao J., et al. “Assessing appetite of the swimming fish based on spontaneous collective behaviors in a recirculating aquaculture system”. Aquacultural Engineering 78 (2017): 196-204.
  41. Smith DV and Tabrett S. “The use of passive acoustics to measure feed consumption by Penaeus monodon (giant tiger prawn) in cultured systems”. Aquacultural Engineering 57 (2013): 38-47.
  42. Burel Christine Robin J and Boujard T. “Can turbot, Psetta maxima, be fed with self-feeders?” Aquatic Living Resources 10 (1997): 381-384.
  43. Mallekh R., et al. “Variability in appetite of turbot, Scophthalmus maximus under intensive rearing conditions: the role of environmental factors”. Aquaculture 165 (1998): 123-138.
  44. Myrberg AA. “Sound communication and interception in fishes”. In: Tavolga WN, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Hearing and Sound Communication in Fishes (1981): 395-426.
  45. Erens KF., et al. “Studies on underwater sounds produced by Yellowtail Seriola quinqueradiata and Amberjack Seriola dumerili in net pens at culture grounds in Middle Kagoshima Bay”. Fisheries Science 64 (1998): 353-358.
  46. Lauder GV. “Aquatic prey capture in fishes: experimental and theoretical approaches”. The Journal of Experimental Biology 125 (1986): 1-16.
  47. Colson DJ., et al. “Sound production during feeding in Hippocampus seahorses (Syngnathidae)”. Environmental Biology of Fishes 51 (1998): 221-229.
  48. Zion B and Barki A. “Ranching fish using acoustic conditioning: has it reached a dead end?” Aquaculture 344-349 (2012): 3-11.
  49. Popper AN and Schilt CR. “Hearing and Acoustic Behavior: Basic and Applied Considerations” (2008): 17-48.
  50. Wysocki LE and Ladich F. “Effects of noise exposure on click detection and the temporal resolution ability of the goldfish auditory system”. Hearing Research 201 (2005): 27.
  51. Abbott RR. “Induced aggregation of pond-reared rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) through acoustic conditioning”. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 101 (1972): 35-43.
  52. Zion B., et al. “Generalization and discrimination of positive and negative acoustic stimuli in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio)”. Behavioural Processes 83 (2010): 306-310.
  53. Bjöornsson B., et al. “Effects of anthropogenic feeding on the migratory behaviour of coastal cod (Gadus morhua) in Northwest Iceland”. Fisheries Research 106 (2010): 81-92


Citation: Agniva Pradhan. “The Power of AI in Fish Feeding and Behavior Management: A Comprehensive Review". Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 5.6 (2023): 90-95.


Copyright: © 2023 Agniva Pradhan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.008

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is June 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US