Growth and Body Composition of Kampung Unggul Balitnak (KUB) Chicken as Affected by Diets Containing Varying Levels of Protein and Energy
B Indarsih*, MH Tamzil, IN Sukharta Jaya and NK Dewi Haryani
Faculty of Animal Science, University of Mataram, Lombok, NTB, Indonesia
*Corresponding Author: B Indarsih, Faculty of Animal Science, University of Mataram, Lombok, NTB, Indonesia.
Received:
December 1, 2021 Published: March 30, 2022
Abstract
Background and Objective: The study was conducted to evaluate three different feeding regimens on growth performance and body composition of Kampung Unggul Balitnak chickens (KUB) during the growing period.
Materials and Methods: One hundred and eighty day old chicks were sexed and fed a commercial crumble diet containing 23% Crude Protein (CP) and 3000 kcal Metabolizable Energy (ME)/kg until 3 days of age after which they were fed according to 17% CP and 3000 kcal ME/kg as Low Protein-Low Energy (LP-LE), 19% CP and 3100 kcal ME/kg as Medium Protein-Medium energy (MP-ME) and 21% CP and 3200 kcal ME/kg as High Protein-High Energy (HP-HE). Each feeding regime was designed with three replicates and having 10 birds per replicate.
Results: Increasing CP and energy levels in the diet did not improve body weight at 53 days of age, and body weight gain during the overall experimental period (4 to 53 d of age). Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was more efficient (p = 0.0416) in higher protein and energy diets than the lower protein and energy diets. Giblets and inedible parts were not affected by dietary treatments. Sex of KUB chicks had significant effects on feed intake, FCR, drumstick, giblet and leg.
Conclusions: LP-LE diet (17% and 3000 kcal ME/kg) was sufficient for females while MP-ME diet (19% CP and 3100 kcal ME/kg) was appropriate for the males.
Key words: Body Weight; Feed Intake; Growth Rate; Sex
References
- Ayam KUB (Ayam Kampung Unggul Balitnak) (2011).
- Hidayat C., et al. “Respon kinerja perteluran ayam kampung unggul Balitnak (KUB) terhadap perlakuan protein ransum pada masa pertumbuhan”. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veterine2 (2011): 83-89.
- Yuwono DM and FR Prasetyo. “Analisis teknis dan ekonomis agribisnis ayam buras sistem semi intensif-intensif (Studi kasus in KUB”Ayam Kampung Unggul” Desa Krengseng Kecamatan Gringsing Kabupaten Batang. Proceeding Seminar Nasional Menggagas Kebangkitan Komoditas Unggulan Lokal Pertanian dan Kelautan. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Trunojoyo Madura (2013): 17-24.
- Bouwkamp EL., et al. “Strain influences on broiler parts yields”. Poultry Science 52 (1973): 1517-1523.
- Moran Jr ET. “Response of broiler strains differing in body fat to inadequate methionine: Live performance and processing yields”. Poultry Science 73 (1994): 1116-1126.
- Ajang OA., et al. “Effect of dietary protein content on growth and body composition of fast and slow feathering broiler chickens”. British Poultry Science 34 (1993): 73-91.
- Gous RM., et al. “Nutritional effects on growth and fatness of broilers”. British Poultry Science 31 (1990): 495-505.
- AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). International Official Methods of Analysis. 16th Arlington, Virginia, USA (1995).
- Murawska D. “The effect of age on growth rate of tissue and organs and the percentage content of edible and inedible components in Koluda white geese”. Poultry Science 92 (2013): 1400-1407.
- Mahfuhz LD., et al. “Protein consumption and efficiency of Kedu, Arab and their crossing chickens fed with different protein levels”. Egypt Poultry Science2 (2011): 491-500.
- Miah MY., et al. “Effect of different levels of dietary energy on growth performance of indigenous desi chicks reared in confinement up to target weight of 950g”. Livestock Research for Rural Development 26 (2014).
- Zainal H., et al. “Persilangan pada ayam lokal (KUB, Sentul, Gaok) untuk meningkatkan produksi daging unggas nasional (Local chicken crossed of KUB, Sentul and Gaok to increase National Poultry Meat Production). Workshop Nasional Unggas Lokal (2012): 101-108.
- Indarsih B and RAE Pym. “The effect of genotype on response in body composition to variation in dietary protein: energy ratios”. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture2 (2010): 101-108.
- Hernández F., et al. “Effect of low-protein diets and single sex on production performance, plasma metabolites, digestibility, and nitrogen excretion in 1- to 48-day-old broilers”. Poultry Science3 (2012): 683-692.
- Ten Doeschate RAHM., et al. “Digestibility studies in broiler chickens: Influence of genotype, age, sex and method of determination”. British Poultry Science 34 (1993): 131-146.
- Le Bihan-Duval E., et al. “Genetic analysis of a selection experiments on increased body weight and breast muscle weight as well as limited abdominal weight”. British Poultry Science 39 (1998): 346-353.
- Nguyen TV and C Bunchasak. “Effect of dietary protein and energy on growth performance and carcass characteristics of Betong chicken at early growth rate”. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology6 (2005): 1171-1178.
- Alabi OJ., et al. “Dietary energy level for optimum productivity and carcass characteristics of indigenous Venda chickens raised in closed confinement”. South African Journal of Animal Science5-1 (2013).
- Horniakova E and KA Abas. “Influence of levels of protein and sex on carcass traits and nutrient content in broiler meats”. Slovak Journal of Animal Science 2 (2009): 75-78.
- Musa HH., et al. “Study on carcass characteristics of chicken breeds raised under intensive condition”. International Journal of Poultry Science6 (2006): 530-533.
- Gheisari HR., et al. “Effect of different levels of dietary crude protein on growth performance, body composition of broiler chicken and low protein diet in broiler chicken”. International Journal of Poultry Science5 (2015): 285-292.
- Wasilewski R., et al. “Structure of the digestive system of ducks depending on sex and genetic background”. Acta Veterinaria Beograd 84 (2015): 153-158.
- Mitchell RD and WH Burke. “Posthatching growth and pectoralis muscle development in broiler strain chickens, bantam chickens and the reciprocal crosses between them”. Growth, Development and Aging 59 (1995): 149-161.
- Sunde ML., et al. “Protein degradation: An important consideration”. Poultry Science., 63.10 (1984): 2055-2061.
Citation
Copyright