Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences (ISSN: 2582-3183)

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 1

Appearance Matters: How has Breeding to Kennel Club Standards Affected the Welfare of “Man’s Best Friend”?

Elohozino Oghale Benneth1,2*, Emmanuel Onche1, Isaac Babatunde Fasipe1 and Abdulsabur Adebayo Aderemi1

1Department of Animal Welfare Science, Food and Agricultural Technology Unit - The Pan African Research Group, Nigeria
2Research Unit, One Health and Development Initiative, Nigeria

*Corresponding Author: Elohozino Oghale Benneth, Department of Animal Welfare Science, Food and Agricultural Technology Unit - The Pan African Research Group, Nigeria.

Received: November 22, 2021 Published: December 21, 2021

Abstract

Bad reproducing practices of dogs have destructive consequences on dog interest and the well-being of holders. This study explores how breeding to kennel club standards affected the welfare of man's best companion? Breeders are compelled to discover reliable residences for dogs and puppies they have bred; ensuring new owners are a good match and understand their lifelong duty of care to their new dog. The outward appearance of a dog most of the time largely affects the welfare of the animal. The study recommends that responsibility is placed solely on selection of physiological traits which are injurious to the health of the breed, to ensure adequate compliance with the new rules and regulations in monitoring breeders as well as the use of modern technology.

Keywords: Dog; Best Friend; Pain

References

  1. Arman Koharik. “A new direction for kennel club regulations and breed standards”. The Canadian Veterinary Journal9 (2007): 953-965.
  2. Australian Shepherd Health and Genetics Institute, California. Sharp, CA c2000 [first printed in Double Helix Network News; “Playing COI”. Using inbreeding Coefficients (2006).
  3. Canadian Kennel Club, Etobicoke. Ontario: Canadian Kennel Club. “CKC Breed Standards” (2006).
  4. Candace Croney U., et al. Warfare in Pet Trade: “Responsible dog breeding guidelines”. Endorsed by the EU Platform on Animal Welfare (2020).
  5. Croney C. “Turning up the volume on Man’s best friend: Ethical issues associated with commercial dog breeding”. Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research2 (2019): 230-252.
  6. Darwin C. “The Origin of Species”. New York: New American Library (1958): 10-12.
  7. Edward Eadie. “Education for Animal Welfare”. Springer (2011).
  8. Fall T., et al. “Diabetes mellitus in a population of 180,000 insured dogs: Incidence, survival, and breed distribution”. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 21 (2007): 1209-1216.
  9. Fawcett A., et al. “Consequences and Management of Canine Brachycephaly in Veterinary Practice: Perspectives from Australian Veterinarians and Veterinary Specialists. Animals1 (2019): 3.
  10. FCI: Federation Cynologique Internationale (AISBL). FCI-Standard (2009).
  11. Huber L. “How dogs perceive and understand us”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 25 (2016): 339-344.
  12. Kennel Club website, Breed Standard webpages.
  13. Mermann AC., et al. “Learning to care for the dying”. Academic Medicine 66 (1991): 32-35.
  14. Mike Radford. “Animal Welfare Law in Britain: Regulation and Responsibility (Oxford University Press (2001).
  15. Mike Radford. “Animal Welfare Law in Britain”. Regulation and Responsiveness (Oxford University Press (2001).
  16. Nordquist RE., et al. “Mutilating procedures, management practices, and housing conditions that may affect the welfare of farm animals: Implications for welfare research”. Animals2 (2017): 12.
  17. Palmer C., et al. “Inconvenient desires: Should we routinely neuter companion animals?” Anthrozoos a Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People and Animals 25 (2012): S153-S172.
  18. Rooney NJ. “The welfare of pedigree dogs: Cause for concern”. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. Clinical Applications and Research5 (2009): 180-186.
  19. Rooney N and Bradshaw J. “Canine Welfare Science: An Antidote to Sentiment and Myth”. In Domestic Dog Cognition and Behavior: The Scientific Study of Canis Familiaris; Horowitz, A., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany (2014): 241-274.
  20. The UK National German Shepherd Dog Helpline. “The Ties that Bind: Genetics and the Breeder”. Thorpe-Vargas, Susan: Cargill, John; GSD Helpline; Breeding and Genetics (2006).
  21. Warren Cat. “What the dog knows: the science and wonder of working dogs”. Simon and Schuster (2013).
  22. Yeates J and Main D. “Assessment of companion animal quality of life in veterinary practice and research”. Journal of Small Animal Practice6 (2009): 274-281.

Citation

Citation: Elohozino Oghale Benneth., et al. “Appearance Matters: How has Breeding to Kennel Club Standards Affected the Welfare of “Man’s Best Friend”?". Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 4.1 (2022): 114-118.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Elohozino Oghale Benneth., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.008

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is June 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US