Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences (ASVS)

Review Article Volume 2 Issue 2

Assessment and Management of Chronic Pain in Working Equines

Roy RC1 and Dharmaceelan S2

1Prairie Swine Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Canada
2Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India

*Corresponding Author: Roy RC, Prairie Swine Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.

Received: January 08, 2020; Published: January 23, 2020

×

Abstract

  Management of chronic pain in animals is complex because of the multi-dimensional nature of pain (intensity, frequency and duration) and the absence of an assessment tool, which quantifies these different dimensions. Recently, many researchers have been working to develop behavioural assessment tools to quantify chronic pain in equines, especially in conditions such as chronic laminitis in horses, with varying amounts of success. In animals, using a self-reporting technique is not possible; therefore, behaviour assessment is the gold standard under most conditions, especially in the field. Pain related behaviours are species specific. Therefore, there is a need to have an individual assessment tool for each species (such as separate assessment tools for donkeys, horses and mules). Working equines in developing countries are at greater risk of chronic pain than equines in the developed world due to the strenuous work in which they are involved. Equines working in highly regulated environments as in economically developed countries, also suffer from chronic pain due to conditions such as laminitis, navicular disease, several kinds of arthritis and back pain, for which assessment and management tools are currently very limited. This paper discusses some strategies to assess and manage chronic pain in working equines.

Keywords:Equines, Chronic Pain, Behaviour, Pain Management, Pain Assessment

×

References

  1. IASP. "Pain terms: A list with definitions and notes on usage". Pain 6 (1979): 249-252.
  2. Zimmerman M. "Behavioural investigation of pain in animals". In Proceedings. Workshop for Assessment of Pain in Farm Animals (1986):16-27.
  3. Molony V and Kent JE. "Assessment of acute pain in farm animals using behavioural and physiological measurements". Journal of Animal Sciences 75 (1997): 266-272.
  4. Greene SA. "Chronic pain: Pathophysiology and treatment implications". Topics in Companion Animal Medicine 25.1 (2010): 5-9.
  5. Robertson SA. "What is pain?" Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 221.2 (2002): 202-205.
  6. Jones E., et al. "Neuropathic changes in equine laminitis pain". Pain 132 (2007): 321-331.
  7. Mogil JS and Crager SE. "What Should We Be Measuring in Behavioral Studies of Chronic Pain in Animals?" Pain 112 (2004): 12-15.
  8. Rose RJ. "Navicular disease in the horse". Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 16 (1996): 18-24.
  9. Swann WJ. "Improving the welfare of working equine animals in developing countries". Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100 (2006): 148-151.
  10. Ahern TJ. "Laminar corial hyperaesthesia in chronic forelimb lameness". Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 15.11 (1995): 460-463.
  11. Pritchard JC., et al. "Assessment of the welfare of working horses, mules and donkeys, using health and behaviour parameters". Preventive Veterinary Medicine 69 (2005): 65-283.
  12. KeefeFJ., et al. "Behavioural approaches in the multidisciplinary management of chronic pain: Programs and issues". Clinical Psychology Review 6 (1986): 87-113.
  13. Ashley FH., et al. "Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: Application to clinical practice and future studies". Equine Veterinary Journal 37 (2005): 565-575.
  14. Roy RC., et al. "Controlled field trial of a behaviour pain assessment tool in donkeys". In: Proceedings of Sixth International Colloquium on Working Equines, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi, India, (2010).
  15. Price J., et al. "Preliminary evaluation of a behaviour-based system for assessment of post-operative pain in horses following arthroscopic surgery". Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 30 (2003): 124-137.
  16. Anil SS., et al. "Challenges of pain assessment in domestic animals". Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 220.3 (2002): 313-319.
  17. Driessen B., et al. "Pain: From diagnosis to effective treatment". Clinical Techniques in Equine Practice 6 (2007): 126-134.
  18. Molony V and Kent JE. "Validation of a method for assessment of an acute pain in lambs". Applied Animal Behaviour Science (2002): 215-238.
  19. Turk DC and Rudy TE. "Towards a comprehensive assessment of chronic pain patients". Behaviour Research and Therapy 25 (1987): 237-249.
  20. Rietmann TR., et al. "The association between heart rate, heart rate variability, endocrine and behavioural pain measures in horses suffering from laminitis". Journal of Veterinary Medicine 51 (2004): 218-225.
  21. Koch A., et al. "Nitric oxide and pro-inflammatory cytokines correlate with pain intensity in chronic pain patients". Inflammation Research 56 (2007): 32-37.
  22. Hugonnard M., et al. "Attitudes and concerns of French veterinarians towards pain and analgesia in dogs and cats". Veterinary Aneasthesia and Analgesia 31 (2004): 154-163.
  23. Stannard C., et al. "Evidence based chronic pain management". Blackwell publishing Ltd, (2010) West Sussex, UK.
  24. Valverde A and Gunkel CI. "Pain management in horses and farm animals". Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care 15.4 (2005): 295-307.
  25. Driessen et al. “Neuropathic Pain Management in Chronic Laminitis”. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 26.2 (2010): 315-337.
  26. Merck Veterinary Manual. "Pain management: Chronic pain". Merck and Co., Inc. (2008) Whitehouse Station, NJ . USA.
  27. Dong XW., et al. "The antipsychotic drug, fluphenazine, effectively reverses mechanical allodynia in rat models of neuropathic pain". Psychopharmacology 195 (2008): 559-568.
×

Citation

Citation: Roy RC and Dharmaceelan S. “Assessment and Management of Chronic Pain in Working Equines”. Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 2.2 (2020): 09-13.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.008

Indexed In





News and Events


Contact US