Acta Scientific Pharmacology

Review Article Volume 2 Issue 2

Buprenorphine Half-Life - Further Considerations

Daniel M Strickland1* and Preeti Manandhar2

1WJ Medical Associates, NC, USA
2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia

*Corresponding Author: Daniel M Strickland, WJ Medical Associates, NC, USA.

Received: August 11, 2020; Published: January 22, 2021

×

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated published studies on the half-life of sublingually administered buprenorphine to determine if the values reported, and promulgated, in medical reference documents are supported by those data.

Design: We analyzed, by regression analysis, a frequently referenced pharmacokinetic study on the elimination of sublingually administered buprenorphine.

Results: Buprenorphine appears to follow a three-compartment distribution/elimination process. The half-lives are: Alpha: 1.4 hours, Beta: 4.6 hours, Gamma: 16.5 hours. The predominant portion of the elimination occurs in the alpha and beta phases, but the gamma phase (sometimes called the “terminal” phase) which accounts for a minor mass of drug, appears to be closer to the values (24-69 hours) reported in medical reference documents.

Conclusions: Many clinicians who treat patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) have observed that, given the option, the majority of patients prescribed buprenorphine choose to split their daily doses into 2 or 3 portions in order to reduce withdrawal symptoms that may occur towards the end of that dosing period. We conclude that the “clinical”, or effective, half-life of sublingually administered buprenorphine is much lower than that promulgated in most medical reference documents.

Keywords: Buprenorphine; Half-life; Opioids; Opioid Use Disorder; OUD; Pharmacokinetics

×

References

  1. US Congressional Research Service (CRS). “Buprenorphine and the Opioid Crisis: A Primer for Congress” (2020).
  2. Kuhlman JJ., et al. “Human Pharmacokinetics of intravenous, sublingual, and buccal buprenorphine”. Journal of Analytical Toxicology6 (1996): 369-378.
  3. Kuhlman JJ., et al. “Relationship of plasma buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine to withdrawal symptoms during dose induction, maintenance and withdrawal from sublingual buprenorphine”. Addiction4 (1998): 549-559.
  4. Suboxone (buprenorphine and naloxone) sublingual film: Full prescribing information. Indivior (2020).
  5. US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA): Treatment Improvement Protocol 63 (TIP 63) (2020).
  6. Bullingham RES., et al. “Buprenorphine kinetics”. Clinical Pharmacology Therapy 28 (1980): 667-672.
  7. McAleer SD., et al. “Pharmacokinetics of high-dose buprenorphine following single administration of sublingual tablet formulations in opioid naïve healthy male volunteers under a naltrexone block”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1 (2003): 75-83.
  8. Harris DS., et al. “Buprenorphine and naloxone co-administration in opiate-dependent patients stabilized on sublingual buprenorphine”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence1 (2000): 85-94.
  9. Harris DS., et al. “Pharmacokinetics and Subjective Effects of Sublingual Buprenorphine, Alone or in Combination with Naloxone. Lack of Dose Proportionality”. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5 (2004): 329-340.
  10. Birkett DJ. “Pharmacokinetics made easy (2nd ed). McGraw-Hill Australia, North Ryde, N.S.W (2002).
  11. Dong R., et al. “Pharmacokinetics of Sublingual Buprenorphine Tablets Following Single and Multiple Doses in Chinese Participants With and Without Opioid Use Disorder”. Drugs R D 19 (2019): 255-265.
  12. Wright JG., et al. “All half-lives are wrong, but some half-lives are useful”. Clinical Pharmacokinetics4 (2001): 237-244.
  13. Sahin S and Benet LZ. “The Operational Multiple Dosing Half-life: A Key to Defining Drug Accumulation in Patients and to Designing Extended Release Dosage Forms”. Pharmaceutical Research 12 (2008): 2869-2877.
  14. Greenwald MK., et al. “Buprenorphine maintenance and mu opioid receptor availability in the treatment of opioid use disorder: Implications for clinical use and policy”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 144 (2014): 1-11.
  15. Boas RA and Villiger JW. “Clinical Actions of fentanyl and Buprenorphine. The significance of receptor binding”. British Journal of Anesthesia 2 (1985): 192-196.
  16. Shargel L and Yu AB. Applied Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, 4th Edition. New York, McGraw Hill (1999).
  17. Gueye PN., et al. “Lack of Effect of Single High Doses of Buprenorphine on Arterial Blood Gases in the Rat”. Toxicology Science1 (2001): 148-154.
  18. Paone D., et al. “Buprenorphine infrequently found in fatal overdose in New York City”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 155 (2015): 298‐301.
  19. Bullingham RE., et al. “Sublingual buprenorphine used postoperatively: clinical observations and preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis”. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2 (1981): 117‐122.
  20. Bourne DWA. “Non-Compartmental Analysis” (2002).
  21. Toutain PL and Bousquet-Mélou A. “Plasma terminal half-life”. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 6 (2004): 427-39.
×

Citation

Citation: Daniel M Strickland and Preeti Manandhar. “Buprenorphine Half-Life - Further Considerations".Acta Scientific Pharmacology 2.2 (2021): 03-10.




Metrics

Acceptance rate36%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In


News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is December 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"

Contact US