Acta Scientific Neurology (ASNE) (ISSN: 2582-1121)

Research Article Volume 8 Issue 5

Effects of Neural Mobilization on Quality of Life of Patients with Primary Tension Headache

Shailendra Mehta1* and Ronita Soni2

1Professor and Principal, Department of Physiotherapy, JRNRV, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
2Department of Physiotherapy, JRNRV, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

*Corresponding Author: Shailendra Mehta, Professor and Principal, Department of Physiotherapy, JRNRV, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Received: April 09, 2025; Published: April 29, 2025

Abstract

Headache is the utmost common type of pain, affecting 66% of the worldwide population [1]. In India prevalence of problem is 63.9%. Females are found to be more affected 74.3% than males (32.6%) [2]. As a result, it is a severe health issue that affects both quality of life and productivity of work. A tension headache is the most common type of problem. It is pain or uneasiness in the head, scalp, or neck, and is often associated with muscle tension in these areas,neck and scalp muscles become tense or contract; contractions possibly be a result of stress, depression, head injury, or anxiety. A definite disc protrusion was responsible for cervical radiculopathy in 21.9% of patients; 68.4% were related to spondylosis or both. Radiculopathy accompanied with headache is the key concern in most of patients.[3]Mobilisation of nervous system has recently developed an as an adjunct to assessment and management of pain. Themain aspect of this approach is the healthy mechanics of nervous system allows pain free posture and movement to be achieved. However , in the presence of pathomechanics of neural tissue symptoms may be triggered by during daily events. The neural mobilization move the neural tissue in order to gain mobility and their sensitivity to mechanical stress in order to improve their mechanical and physiological function [4]. Keywords: Neural Mobilization; Quality; Life; Patients; Tension Headache

References

  1. Ajithkumar GP., et al. “Effectiveness of Postural Correction Versus Soft Tissue Techniques Alongwith Neural Mobilization in Management of Pain and Disability Associated with Cervicogenic Headache: A Comparative Study”. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy 18 (2024).
  2. Ashish Duggal., et al. “The burden of headache disorders in North India: methodology, and validation of a Hindi version of the HARDSHIP questionnaire, for a community-based survey in Delhi and national capital territory region”. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2024).
  3. Srinivasulu M and Divya Chunduri. “Comparing Mulligan Mobilization and Neural Mobilization Effects in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy”. (2021).
  4. “Neurodynamics”. Physiotherapy (1995).
  5. Ravilla Vijayalakshmi., et al. “Effects of neural mobilization on sciatic nerve excursion, symptoms,and regional function in individuals with nerve-related low back pain”. Physiotherapy Quarterly3 (2022): 27-33.
  6. Alejandro Ferragut-Garcı., et al. “Effectiveness of a Treatment Involving Soft Tissue Techniques and/or Neural Mobilization Techniques in the Management of Tension-Type Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial”. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Journal (2016).
  7. Min Yang., et al. “Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6™) across episodic and chronic migraine”. Cephalalgia3 (2011): 357-367.
  8. Pietro Bini., et al. “The effectiveness of manual and exercise therapy on headache intensity and frequency among patients with cervicogenic headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Chiropractic and Manual Therapies 30 (2022): 49.
  9. Gonzalo Navarro-Fernández., et al. “Endogenous Neurostimulation and Physiotherapy in Cluster Headache: A Clinical Case”. Brain Science 3 (2019): 60.
  10. Faizan Zaffar Kashoo., et al. “Neural mobilization in Bell's palsy: A case report”. Cranio 3 (2021): 266-269.
  11. GiacomoCarta and AgneseSeregni. “Validation and Reliability of a Novel Vagus Nerve Neurodynamic Test and Its Effects on Heart Rate in Healthy Subjects: Little Differences Between Sexes”. Frontiers in Neuroscience15 (2021): 698470.
  12. Nicholas Moser., et al. “Suspected trigeminal nerve neuropathy causing persistent idiopathic facial pain: a report of four cases”. The Journal of Canadian Association2 (2019): 126-138.
  13. Phil page. “Cervicogenic headaches: an evidence-led approach to clinical management”. The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 3 (2011): 254-266.
  14. MikhledMaayaha and Mohammed Al-Jarraha. “Evaluation of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation as a Treatment of Neck Pain due to Musculoskeletal Disorders”. Journal of Clinical Medical Research 3 (2010): 127-136.
  15. Michael Costello. “Treatment of a Patient with Cervical Radiculopathy Using Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation, Soft Tissue Mobilization, and Exercise”. The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 3 (2008): 129-135.
  16. Isha Sikka., et al. “Effects of Deep Cervical Flexor Training on Forward Head Posture, Neck Pain, and Functional Status in Adolescents Using Computer Regularly”. BioMed Research International (2020): 8327565.
  17. The Sensitive Nervous System. David S. Butler.
  18. Brown CL., et al. “The effects of neurodynamic mobilization on fluid dispersion within the tibial nerve at the ankle: an unembalmed cadaveric study”. The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 1 (2011): 26-34.
  19. Kinfe TM., et al. “Cervical non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for preventive and acute treatment of episodic and chronic migraine and migraine-associated sleep disturbance: A prospective observational cohort study”. The Journal of Headache and Pain 16 (2015): 101-101.
  20. Gobel S and Purvis MB. “Anatomical studies of the organization of the spinal V nucleus: The deep bundles and the spinal V tract”. Brain Research 48 (1974): 27-44.
  21. Contreras RJ., et al. “The central projections of the trigeminal, facial, glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves: An autoradiographic study in the rat”. Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System 6 (1982): 303-322.
  22. Rustioni A., et al. “Afferents from the facial, vago-glossopharyngeal and second cervical nerves to the substantiagelatinosa of the rat”. Brain Research 37 (1972): 137-140.
  23. Nomura S and Mizuno N. “Central distribution of primary afferent fibers in the Arnold’s nerve (the auricular branch of the vagus nerve): A transganglionic HRP study in the cat”. Brain Research 292 (1984): 199-205.
  24. Ali Talebi GA., et al. “Treatment of chronic radiculopathy of the first sacral nerve root using neuromobilization techniques: A case study”. The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 3 (2010): 151-159.
  25. Nawal Abdel Raaof Abo Shady1 , Mahmoud Hemeda Mohamed2 et al. neural gliding versus mechanical traction in patient with cervical radiculopathy” JMSCR8.
  26. Robert J Nee and David Butler. “Management of peripheral neuropathic pain: Integrating neurobiology, neurodynamics, and clinical evidence”. Physical Therapy in Sport 7 (2006): 36-49.

Citation

Citation: Shailendra Mehta and Ronita Soni. “Effects of Neural Mobilization on Quality of Life of Patients with Primary Tension Headache”. Acta Scientific Neurology 8.5 (2025): 35-42.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Shailendra Mehta and Ronita Soni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate32%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In




News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.

Contact US