Angel Molina Leon*
Clinical Neurophysiology Service, Medical Center Virgen de la Caridad, Cartagena, Servant of Clinical Neurophysiology of The Hospital Complex of Santa Lucia, Cartagena, Murcia
*Corresponding Author: Angel Molina Leon, Clinical Neurophysiology Service, Medical Center Virgen de la Caridad, Cartagena, Servant of Clinical Neurophysiology of the Hospital Complex of Santa Lucia, Cartagena, Murcia.
Received: May 21, 2019; Published: December 23, 2019
In this study, we would like to emphasize the comparison of the 4th median-ulnar finger antidromic technique recognized and used in a large number of neurophysiology laboratories worldwide, in addition to other determinations and relate these values to the motor latency of the median. According to the Spanish EMG manual of Dr. Jimenez [1,2] in his "Manual of clinical electromyography". The comparison in the antidromic sensory conduction of the median and ulnar nerves between the wrist and the 4th finger where the driving distance is about 14 cm in both cases, interim latency values greater than 0.35 msec. and the latency of the start of the sensory potential greater than 0.43 msec. they are abnormal, the higher value corresponding to the antidromic sensitive evoked potential of the median.
Keywords: Comparative Analysis; Clinical Diagnosis
Citation: Angel Molina Leon. “Comparative Analysis of 100 Patients with Clinical Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and EMG-ENG for Confirmation. Comparison of Distal Motor Latencies of the Median Motor in Relation to The Classic "Comparison of Interpeptic Sensory Latencies Between The 4th Median-Ulnar Antidromic Finger". Relationship Between Both Values”.Acta Scientific Neurology 3.1 (2020): 37-42.
Copyright: © 2020 Angel Molina Leon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.