Acta Scientific Microbiology (ISSN: 2581-3226)

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 6

Impact of Oilfield Wastewater from Santa Barbara Oil Rig Location on the Microbial Population of Santa Barbara River in Bayelsa State, Nigeria

Oyibo Ntongha and Obire Omokaro*

Department of Microbiology, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

*Corresponding Author: Obire Omokaro, Department of Microbiology, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Received: April 14, 2022; Published: May 18, 2022

Abstract

Oilfield wastewater contains toxic substances that are detrimental to aquatic microflora. Its continuous disposal into aquatic environment has long become a menace in the Niger Delta due to oil exploration activities. The effect of oilfield wastewater from Santa Barbara oil rig was investigated bi-weekly for a period of two (2) months. A total of forty (40) water samples collected from the vicinity of the oil rig and from a control point were analyzed for counts of bacteria and fungi using standard microbiological methods. Results showed that counts of total heterotrophic bacteria (THB) ranged from 3.8×104cfu/ml to 9.2×104cfu/ml; total fungi ranged from 1.2×102cfu/ml to 3.2×102cfu/ml; total hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria (THUB) ranged from 2.6×103cfu/ml to 4.0×103cfu/ml while total hydrocarbon utilizing fungi (THUF) ranged from 0.8×101cfu/ml to 1.7×101cfu/ml. The decreasing order of both THB and fungi counts in the stations was; Control > Downstream > Upstream > Deck drainage > Drilling point. The decreasing order of THUB was Deck drainage > Drilling point > Upstream > Downstream > Control. The decreasing order of THUF was Deck drainage > Drilling point > Downstream > Upstream > Control. The bacteria isolated from the study area included Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Aeromonas, Alcaligenes, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Salmonella and Escherichia. Statistical analysis (ANOVA) showed that there is significant difference in THB between the control and other stations; calculated F value (34.73952) ˃ F-critical value (6.388234). The lowest counts in the rig locations are attributed to the impact of oilfield wastewater on aquatic microbes and diversity. While the highest counts of hydrocarbon utilizing microbes is attributed to the selective enrichment of hydrocarbon utilizers. Their high prevalence revealed that Santa Barbara River contained active indigenous hydrocarbon utilizers that can be harnessed for bioremediation process.

Keywords: Swamp; Santa Barbara Oil Rig; Oilfield Wastewater; Hydrocarbon Utilizing Bacteria

References

  1. National Geographic Society. “National Geographic Society Quarterly report”. (2011): 230-232.
  2. Keddy PA. “Wetland Ecology: Principle and Conservation 2nd Edition”. Cambridge University Press. (2010): 497.
  3. Hughes FMR. “The flooded forest; Guidelines for Policy Makers and River Manager in Europe on the restoration of Flood Plain Forest (FLOBAR)”. Department of Geography, University" of Cambridge, United Kingdom. (2003): 96.
  4. Mitsch W J and Gosselink J G. “Wetland”. Hoboken New Jersey; John Wiley and Sons Incorporation (2015).
  5. Jerry M N., et al. “Oil well produced water discharges to the North Sea”. Marine Environmental Research3 (2006): 224-246.
  6. Gazali AK. “Environmental impact of produced water and drilling waste discharges from Niger Delta petroleum industry”. Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN) 6 (2017): 22-29.
  7. Ekins P., et al. “Zero emissions of oil in water from offshore oil and gas installations: Economic and environmental implications”. Journal of Cleaner Production13 (2007): 1302-1315.
  8. Bakke T., et al. “Environmental impacts of produced water and drilling waste discharges from the Norwegian offshore petroleum industry”. Marine Environmental Research 92 (2013): 154-169.
  9. Neff JM., et al. “Produced water: overview of composition, fates, and effects”. In: K. Lee and J. Neff (Eds.). Produced Water: Environmental Risks and Advances in Mitigation Technologies. Springer Science Publishers, New York (2011): 3-56.
  10. , et al. “Pollution impact and alternative treatment for produced water”. Journal of Natural Resources and Environment Management 5.1 (2015): 25-32.
  11. Ahmadun FR., et al. “Review of technologies of oil and gas produced water treatment”. Journal of Hazardous Materials2-3 (2009): 530-551.
  12. Khatib Z and Verbeek P. “Water to value-produced water management for sustainable field development of mature and green fields”. SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 20-22 March. (2002).
  13. Chen Z., et al. “Modeling and assessment of the produced water discharges from offshore petroleum platforms”. Water Quality Research Journal4 (2007): 303-310.
  14. Payne JF., et al. “Risks to fish associated with barium in drilling fluids and produced water: A chronic toxicity study with Cunner (Tautogolabrus adspersus)”. In K. Lee, and J. Neff (Eds.), New York: Produced Water, Springer. (2011): 401-417.
  15. Ministry of Environment. “Regulation of the Minister of Environment Number 19 Year of 2010 regarding the quality standard of waste water for businesses and/or activities of oil and gas and geothermal”. 19 (2010).
  16. Neff JM. “Bioaccumulation in Marine Organisms. Effects of Contaminants from Oil Well Produced Water”. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (2002): 452.
  17. “Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th Edition”. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA. (1998): 113.
  18. Mills A L., et al. “Enumeration of petroleum-degrading marine and estuarine microorganisms by the most probable number method”. Canadian Journal of Microbialogy 24 (1978): 552-557.
  19. Obire O. “Studies on the biodegradation potential of some microorganisms isolated from water systems of two petroleum producing areas in Nigeria”. Nigerian Journal of Botany 1 (1988): 81-90.
  20. Prescott L., et al. “Microbiology 6th edition”. McGraw Hill, Higher Education. 1221. Avenue of America’s New York. (2006). 135-140.
  21. Obire O and Wemedo SA. “The effect of oil field wastewater on the microbial population of soil in Nigeria”. Niger Delta Biologia 1 (1996): 77-85.
  22. Bergey DH and John GH. “Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology”. Baltimore Williams and Wilkins (1994).
  23. Aleruchi O and Obire O. “Response of soil Microorganisms to oilfield wastewater”. Journal of Advances in Microbiology4 (2019a): 1-8.
  24. Obire O and Amusan FO. “The environmental impact of oilfield formation water on a freshwater stream in Nigeria”. Journal of Applied Science Environmental Management1 (2003): 61-66.
  25. Atlas R M. “Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons: An environmental perspective”. Microbiological Reviews1 (1981): 180-209.
  26. Leahy J G and Colwell R R. “Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment”. Microbiological Review 54 (1990): 305-315.
  27. Aleruchi O and Obire O. “Impact of various concentration of oilfield waste water on soil microorganisms”. e-Journal of Science and Technology3 (2019b): 31-41.

Citation

Citation: Oyibo Ntongha and Obire Omokaro. “Impact of Oilfield Wastewater from Santa Barbara Oil Rig Location on the Microbial Population of Santa Barbara River in Bayelsa State, Nigeria". Acta Scientific Microbiology 5.6 (2022): 45-51.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Oyibo Ntongha and Obire Omokaro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In






News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is December 15, 2022.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US