Acta Scientific Microbiology (ASMI) (ISSN: 2581-3226)

Research Article Volume 3 Issue 9

A Preliminary Study on Desert Invertebrate Gut - A Metagenomic Evaluation of Bacteria Community

Tirza Doniger, Oksana Koryachenko, Chen Sherman and Yosef Steinberger*

The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel

*Corresponding Author: Yosef Steinberger, Professor, The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

Received: June 11, 2020; Published: August 31, 2020

×

Abstract

  The microbiota of the digestive system have recently been at the heart of many studies. Most of these studies dealt with the human digestive tract, e.g. the effect of different types of microbiota on physical and mental health. The objective of this study was to identify the bacterial and fungal populations in the digestive system of common desert invertebrates of different trophic levels. As a preliminary study, we collected four invertebrates that share the same habitat in a desert system in the northern Negev, Israel, over a period of one year. The organisms in which gastrointestinal microbiota were determined included Scorpio palmatus, Adesmia dilatata, Sphincherochila zonata and Hemilepistus reaumuri. Microbial diversity was determined by sequencing DNA harvested from their digestive system. Of a total of 32 orders of bacteria, 26 were present in S. maurus, 22 in S. zonata, 14 in A. dilitata and 8 in H. reaumuri. A significant difference in bacterial diversity was found between S. zonata and A. dilatata. The present study elucidates the importance of the feeding habitat and trophic structure to the microbiotic diversity of the digestive system.

Keywords: Microbiota; Digestive System; Unpredictable Food Source; Extreme Habitat; Diversity

×

References

1.       Pal S and Karmakar P. “Symbionts associated with insect digestive system and their role in insect nutrition”. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 6 (2018): 421-425.2.       Chen CY., et al. “Habitat and indigenous gut microbes contribute to the plasticity of gut microbiome in oriental river prawn during rapid environmental change”. PLoS ONE 12 (2017): e0181427.3.       Chapman RF., et al. “The insects: Structure and function, 5th edn”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013). 4.       Harrison JF. “Insect acid-base physiology”. Annual Review of Entomology 46 (2001): 221-250.5.       Huang XF., et al. “Variations in diversity and richness of gut bacterial communities of termites (Reticulitermes flavipes) fed with grassy and woody plant substrates”. Microbial Ecology 65 (2013): 531-536.6.       Wang J., et al. “Community structure of gut bacteria of Dendroctonus armandi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) larvae during overwintering stage”. Science Report 7 (2017): 14242. 7.       Adams AS., et al. “Geographic variation in bacterial communities associated with the red turpentine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)”. Environmental Entomology 39 (2010): 406-414.8.       Levy Y., et al. “Carbon transfer of an algae-herbivore system using C14 as a tracer: A comparative study of three desert snails”. Presented at Third Int. Conf. Environ. Quality and Ecosystem Stability, Jerusalem, Israel (1986).9.       Boucias DG., et al. “The hindgut lumen prokaryotic microbiota of the termite Reticulitermes flavipes and its responses to dietary lignocellulose composition”. Molecular Ecology 22 (2013): 1836-1853.10.   Tholen A., et al. “The gut microflora of Reticulitermes flavipes, its relation to oxygen, and evidence for oxygen dependent acetogenesis by the most abundant Enterococcus sp”. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 24 (1997): 137-149.11.   Poulsen M and Sapountzis P. “Behind every great ant, there is a great gut”. Molecular Ecology 21 (2012): 2054-2057.12.   Russell JA., et al. “Bacterial gut symbionts are tightly linked with the evolution of herbivory in ants”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 (2009): 21236-21241.13.   Hulcr J., et al. “Mycangia of ambrosia beetles host communities of bacteria”. Microbial Ecology 64 (2012): 784-793. 14.   Reid NM., et al. “Biodiversity of active and inactive bacteria in the gut flora of wood -feeding huhu beetle larvae (Prionoplus reticularis)”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 77 (2011): 7000-7006.15.   Shachak M and Brand S. “The relationship between sit and wait foraging strategy and dispersal in the desert scorpion, Scorpio maurus palmatus”. Oecologia 60 (1983): 371-377.16.   Ayal Y., et al. “How can high animal diversity be supported in low-productivity deserts? The role of macrodetritivory and habitat Phsiognomy”. In: Shachak M, Gosz JR, Pickett STA, Perevolotsky A (eds) Biodiversity in drylands: Toward a unified framework. Oxford University Press, New York (2005): 15-29.17.   Steinberger Y. “Energy and protein budget in the desert isopod Hemilepistus reaumuri”. Oecologia Generalis 10 (1989): 117-134.18.   Shachak M and Steinberger Y. “An algae - desert snail food chain: Energy flow and snail turnover”. Oecologia (Berl.) 146 (1980): 402-411.19.   Brown BP and Wernegreen JJ. “Deep divergence and rapid evolutionary rates in gut-associated Acetobacteraceae of ants”. BMC Microbiology16 (2013): 140.20.   Günther B., et al. “Variations in prey consumption of centipede predators in forest soils as indicated by molecular gut content analysis”. Oikos 123 (2014): 1192-1198.21.   Eitzinger B., et al. “Testing the validity of functional response models using molecular gut content analysis for prey choice in soil predators”. Oikos 127 (2018): 915-926.22.   Evenari M., et al. “Runoff farming in the Negev Desert of Israel”. 7th Progress Report. Hebrew University and Blaustein Desert Research Institute, Jerusalem, Sede Boker (1982).23.   Merriman B., et al. “Progress in ion torrent semiconductor chip based sequencing”. Electrophoresis 33 (2012): 3397-3417.24.   Caporaso JG., et al. “QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data”. Nature Methods 7 (2010): 335-336.25.   Oksanen J., et al. Package vegan: Community Ecology Package, R package version 2.3-1 (2013).26.   Andersen KS., et al. “ampvis2: an R package to analyse and visualise 16S rRNA amplicon data”. bioRxiv (2018).27.   Karasov WH and Douglas AE. “Comparative digestive physiology”. Comprehensive Physiology 3 (2013): 741-783.28.   Franzini PZ., et al. “The gut microbiomes of two pachysoma macleay desert dung beetle species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) feeding on different diets”. PloS ONE 11.8 (2016): e0161118.29.   Janssen PH. “Identifying the dominant soil bacteria taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72 (2006): 1719-1728.30.   Whitford WG. “Ecology of desert systems”. Academic Press, New York, London (2002).31.   Morales-Jiménez J., et al. “Gut-associated bacteria throughout the life cycle of the bark beetle Dendroctonus rhizophagus Thomas and Bright (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and their cellulolytic activities”. Microbial Ecology 64 (2012): 268-278.32.   Ziganshina EE., et al. “Fungal, bacterial, and archaeal diversity in the digestive tract of several beetle larvae (Coleoptera)”. Biomed Research International (2018): 6765438.33.   Rojas-Jiménez K and Hernández, M. “Isolation of fungi and bacteria associated with the guts of tropical wood-feeding coleoptera and determination of their lignocellulolytic activities”. International Journal of Microbiology (2015).34.   Kaiser K., et al. “Driving forces of soil bacterial community structure, diversity, and function in temperate grasslands and forests”. Science Report 6 (2016): 33696.35.   Rok K., et al. “Intestinal microbiota of terrestrial isopods”. In: Konig H, Varma A (eds) Soil biology, Intestinal microorganisms of termites and other invertebrates. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 6 (2006): 115-131.36.   Bolaños LM., et al. “Species-specific diversity of novel bacterial lineages and differential abundance of predicted pathways for toxic compound degradation in scorpion gut microbiota”. Environmental Microbiology 18 (2016): 1364-1378.37.   Müller V. “Energy conservation in acetogenic bacteria – Minireview”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69 (2003): 6345-6353.38.   Rorke RO., et al. “Dining local: the microbial diet of a snail that grazes microbial communities is geographically structured”. Environmental Microbiology 17 (2015): 1753‐1764.39.   Zbinden M., et al. “Bacterial communities associated with the wood‐feeding gastropod Pectinodonta sp. (Patellogastropoda, Mollusca)”. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 74 (2010): 450‐463.40.   Dar MA., et al. “Gut microbiome analysis of snails: A biotechnological approach”. In: Ray S (ed) Organismal and molecular malacology (2017).41.   Williams DD., et al. “Structure and mechanics of intermittent wetland communities: Bacteria to anacondas”. In: Herrara JR (ed) International wetlands: Ecological conservation. Nova Science Publisher, Inc., NY (2004): 17-55.

×

Citation

Citation: Yosef Steinberger., et al. “A Preliminary Study on Desert Invertebrate Gut - A Metagenomic Evaluation of Bacteria Community". Acta Scientific Microbiology 3.9 (2020): 128-136.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In






News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is October 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US