Acta Scientific Microbiology (ASMI) (ISSN: 2581-3226)

Review Article Volume 3 Issue 5

Biological Control of Weeds by Fungi: Challenges and Opportunities

Hamid Cheraghian Radi1* and Ali Mohammad Banaei-Moghaddam2

1Department of Microbial Biotechnology, School of Biology and Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2Laboratory of Genomics and Epigenomics (LGE), Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics (IBB), University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

*Corresponding Author: Hamid Cheraghian Radi, Department of Microbial Biotechnology, School of Biology and Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Received: March 17, 2020; Published: April 17, 2020



  Weed plants are one of the main constraints to agriculture and cause considerable crop yield loss besides reducing product quality and leading to health and environmental threats. In comparison to various weed management strategies, biological control-especially mycoherbicides-offer an innovative approach to address this problem. Today, the bio-control of weeds by mycoherbicide (either fungal spore suspension or their metabolites) has received significant academic attention and over the past few decades some of the high profile candidates became commercially available. Employing mycoherbicide proposes benefits including being environmentally friendly, cost effective, and identifying new herbicidal mechanisms. This review focuses on challenges that mycoherbicides encounter before their adoption. Besides, important factors in both selecting and improving a fungal strain as a mycoherbicide are reviewed. Additionally, using integrated weed management as complementary methods to elevate the efficacy of mycoherbicides have been considered.

Keywords: Weed Management; Agriculture; Biological Control; Mycoherbicides



  1. Gadermaier G., et al. “Allergens of weed pollen: an overview on recombinant and natural molecules”. Methods1 (2014): 55-66.
  2. Yandoc-Ables C., et al. “Plant pathogens at work: Progress and possibilities for weed biocontrol classical versus bioherbicidal approach”. Plant Health Progress1 (2007): 32.
  3. Ash GJ. “Biological Control of Weeds with Mycoherbicides in the Age of Genomics”. Pest Technology1 (2011): 41-47.
  4. Shaw RH., et al. “The life history and host range of the Japanese knotweed psyllid, Aphalara itadori Shinji: potentially the first classical biological weed control agent for the European Union”. Biological Control 2 (2009): 105-113.
  5. Hoagland RE., et al. “Bioherbicides: research and risks”. Toxin Reviews4 (2007): 313-342.
  6. Goodwin PH. “A molecular weed-mycoherbicide interaction: Colletotrichum gloeosporioides sp. malvae and round-leaved mallow, Malva pusilla”. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 23.1 (2001): 28-35.
  7. Barton J. “Bioherbicides: All in a Days Work for a Superhero”. What’s New in Biological Control of Weeds 34 (2005): 4-6.
  8. Setliff E. “The wound pathogen Chondrostereum purpureum, its history and incidence on trees in North America”. Australian Journal of Botany5 (2002): 645-651.
  9. Bailey KL. “The bioherbicide approach to weed control using plant pathogens”. Integrated Pest Management: Elsevier (2014): 245-266.
  10. Page ALacey K. “Economic impact assessment of Australian weed biological control”. CRC for Australian Weed Management (2006).
  11. Cullen J. “Bringing the cost benefit analysis of biological control of Chondrilla juncea up to date”. Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds (1984): 145-152.
  12. Daniel J., et al. “Biological Control of Northern Jointvetch in Rice by An Endemic Fungal Disease”. Weed Science4 (1973): 303-307.
  13. Mortensen K. “The potential of an endemic fungus, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, for biological control of round-leaved mallow (Malva pusilla) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti)”. Weed Science4 (1988): 473-478.
  14. Cimmino A., et al. “Chenopodolin: a phytotoxic unrearranged ent-pimaradiene diterpene produced by Phoma chenopodicola, a fungal pathogen for Chenopodium album biocontrol”. Journal of Natural Products7 (2013): 1291-1297.
  15. Bailey KL., et al. “The effects of Phoma macrostoma on nontarget plant and target weed species”. Biological Control3 (2011): 379-386.
  16. Riddle GE., et al. “Virulence of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and minor on dandelion (Taraxacum officinale)”. Weed Science 39.1 (1991): 109-118.
  17. De Jong MD. “The BioChon story: deployment of Chondrostereum purpureum to suppress stump sprouting in hardwoods”. Mycologist2 (2000): 58-62.
  18. Phatak SC., et al. “Biological control and its integration in weed management systems for purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and esculentus)”. Weed Technology 1.1 (1987): 84-91.
  19. Simmons EG. “Alternaria themes and variations (224-225)”. Mycotaxon 68 (1998): 417-427.
  20. Evidente A., et al. “Alternethanoxins A and B, polycyclic ethanones produced by Alternaria sonchi, potential mycoherbicides for Sonchus arvensis biocontrol”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry15 (2009a): 6656-6660.
  21. Burnett H., et al. “Biological control of milkweed vine with a race of Phytophthora citrophthora”. Proceedings of the annual meeting (1974).
  22. Sharma P., et al. “First Report of Fusarium Wilt in the Broomrape Parasite Growing on Brassica in India”. Plant Disease 95.1 (2011): 75-75.
  23. Pomella AWV., et al. “Nimbya alternantherae a potential biocontrol agent for alligator weed, Alternanthera philoxeroides”. Bio Control2 (2007): 271-288.
  24. Boyette CD., et al. “Redvine (Brunnichia ovata) and trumpetcreeper (Campsis radicans) controlled under field conditions by a synergistic interaction of the bioherbicide, Myrothecium verrucaria, with glyphosate”. Weed Biology and Management1 (2008): 39-45.
  25. Cimmino A., et al. “Fungal phytotoxins with potential herbicidal activity: chemical and biological characterization”. Natural Product Reports12 (2015): 1629-1653.
  26. Duke S., et al. “Phytotoxins of microbial origin with potential for use as herbicides”. Critical Reports on Applied Chemistry 35 (1996): 82-112.
  27. Duke Solydon J. “Herbicides from natural compounds”. Weed Technology2 (1987): 122-128.
  28. Vurro M., et al. “Enhancement of efficacy of Ascochyta caulina to control Chenopodium album by use of phytotoxins and reduced rates of herbicides”. Biological Control2 (2001): 182-190.
  29. Evidente A., et al. “Ascosonchine, the enol tautomer of 4-pyridylpyruvic acid with herbicidal activity produced by Ascochyta sonchi”. Phytochemistry4 (2004): 475-480.
  30. Hsiao P., et al. “Plant native tryptophan synthase beta 1 gene is a non-antibiotic selection marker for plant transformation”. Planta4 (2007): 897-906.
  31. Meiss E., et al. “Molecular processes of inhibition and stimulation of ATP synthase caused by the phytotoxin tentoxin”. Journal of Biological Chemistry36 (2008): 24594-24599.
  32. Dayan FE., et al. “A pathogenic fungi diphenyl ether phytotoxin targets plant enoyl (acyl carrier protein) reductase”. Plant Physiology3 (2008): 1062-1071.
  33. Abbas HK., et al. “Fumonisin-and AAL-toxin-induced disruption of sphingolipid metabolism with accumulation of free sphingoid bases”. Plant Physiology3 (1994): 1085-1093.
  34. Irvine NM., et al. “Synthesis and characterization of synthetic analogs of cinnacidin, a novel phytotoxin from Nectria sp”. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science9 (2008): 891-899.
  35. Hedden P., et al. “Gibberellin biosynthesis in plants and fungi: a case of convergent evolution?” Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 4 (2001): 319-331.
  36. Sands DCPilgeram AL. “Methods for selecting hypervirulent biocontrol agents of weeds: why and how”. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science5 (2009): 581-587.
  37. Custers R., et al. “Genetic alterations that do or do not occur naturally; consequences for genome edited organisms in the context of regulatory oversight”. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 6 (2018): 213.
  38. Stukenbrock EHMc Donald BA. “The origins of plant pathogens in agro-ecosystems”. Annual Review of Phytopathology 46 (2008): 75-100.
  39. Zeilinger S. “Gene disruption in Trichoderma atroviride via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation”. Current Genetics1 (2004): 54-60.
  40. Dickman M., et al. “Insertion of cutinase gene into a wound pathogen enables it to infect intact host”. Nature6248 (1989): 446.
  41. Wang CSt Leger RJ. “A scorpion neurotoxin increases the potency of a fungal insecticide”. Nature Biotechnology12 (2007): 1455.
  42. Meir S., et al. “Transforming a NEP1 toxin gene into two Fusarium to enhance mycoherbicide activity on Orobanche-failure and success”. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science 65.5 (2009): 588-595.
  43. Amsellem Z., et al. “Engineering hypervirulence in a mycoherbicidal fungus for efficient weed control”. Nature Biotechnology10 (2002): 1035.
  44. Radhakrishnan R., et al. “Bioherbicide Current knowledge on weed control mechanism”. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 158 (2018): 131-138.
  45. Jiang SJ., et al. “Isolation and phytotoxicity of a metabolite from Curvularia eragrostidis and characterisation of its modes of action”. Annals of Applied Biology1 (2008): 103-111.
  46. Boyette CD., et al. “Induction of infection in Sesbania exaltata by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene formulated in an invert emulsion”. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology5 (2010): 951-956.
  47. Thomas H., et al. “Fusarium oxysporumf. sp. orthoceras, a Potential Mycoherbicide, Parasitizes Seeds of Orobanche cumana (Sunflower Broomrape): a Cytological Study”. Annals of Botany4 (1999): 453-458.
  48. Park J-M., et al. “IAA producing Enterobacter I-3 as a potent bio-herbicide candidate for weed control: a special reference with lettuce growth inhibition”. Indian Journal of Microbiology 55.2 (2015): 207-212.
  49. Hubbard M., et al. “Impact of macrocidins, produced by Phoma macrostoma, on carotenoid profiles of plants”. Biological Control 89 (2015): 11-22.
  50. Motlagh MRS. “Evaluation of Alternaria alternata causing leaf spot of barnyardgrass grown in rice fields”. African Journal of Microbiology Research21 (2012): 4481-4488.
  51. Ahn B., et al. “Enhancement of Colletotrichum coccodes virulence by inhibitors of plant defense mechanisms”. Biocontrol Science and Technology3 (2005): 299-308.
  52. Motlagh MRS. “Evaluation of Epicoccum purpurascens as biological control agent of Echinochloa in rice fields”. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 9.1 (2011): 394-397.
  53. Ray P Vijayachandran LS. “Evaluation of indigenous fungal pathogens from horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum) for their relative virulence and host range assessments to select a potential mycoherbicidal agent”. Weed Science4 (2013): 580-585.
  54. Piyaboon O., et al. “Pathogenicity, host range and activities of a secondary metabolite and enzyme from Myrothecium roridum on water hyacinth from Thailand”. Weed Biology and Management3 (2016): 132-144.
  55. Hoagland R., et al. “Bioherbicidal effects of Myrothecium verrucaria on glyphosate-resistant and-susceptible Palmer amaranth biotypes” (2013).
  56. Hoagland L., et al. “Role of native soil biology in Brassicaceous seed meal-induced weed suppression”. Soil Biology and Biochemistry7 (2008): 1689-1697.
  57. Wandeler H., et al. “Establishing systemic rust infections in Cirsium arvense in the field”. Biocontrol Science and Technology2 (2008): 209-214.
  58. Chandramohan S Charudattan R. “A multiple-pathogen system for bioherbicidal control of several weeds”. Biocontrol Science and Technology2 (2003): 199-205.
  59. Caesar A. “Synergistic interaction of soilborne plant pathogens and root-attacking insects in classical biological control of an exotic rangeland weed”. Biological Control1 (2003): 144-153.
  60. Gressel J. “Herbicides as synergists for mycoherbicides, and vice versa”. Weed Science3 (2010): 324-328.
  61. Boari A., et al. “ Microbigation: delivery of biological control agents through drip irrigation systems”. Irrigation Science2 (2008): 101-107.
  62. Suckling DM. “Benefits from biological control of weeds in New Zealand range from negligible to massive: a retrospective analysis”. Biological Control1 (2013): 27-32.
  63. Ridings W., et al. “Biological control of milkweed vine in Florida citrus groves with a pathotype of Phytophthora citrophthora”. Proceedings of the IVth International Symposium on the Biological Control of Weeds (1976): 224-240.
  64. Templeton GE., et al. “Biological weed control with mycoherbicides”. Annual Review of Phytopathology1 (1979): 301-310.
  65. Casella F., et al. “Effectiveness and technological feasibility of bioherbicide candidates for biocontrol of green foxtail (Setaria viridis)”. Biocontrol Science and Technology10 (2010): 1027-1045.
  66. Siva C. “Alternative strategies for broadleaf weed management in residential lawns” (2014).
  67. Pyšek P., et al. “Ecology and management of giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum)”. CAB International, Wallingford (2007): 352.
  68. Cordeau S., et al. “Bioherbicides: dead in the water? A review of the existing products for integrated weed management”. Crop Protection 87 (2016): 44-49.
  69. Vurro MEvans H. “Opportunities and constraints for the biological control of weeds in Europe. Proceedings of the XII international symposium biological control weeds”. CAB International, Wallingford (2008): 455-462.
  70. Ani O., et al. “Overview of Biological Methods of Weed Control”. Biological Approaches for Controlling Weeds (2018): 5.


Citation: Hamid Cheraghian Radi., et al. “Biological Control of Weeds by Fungi: Challenges and Opportunities". Acta Scientific Microbiology 3.5 (2020): 62-70.


Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is April 30th, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue".
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US