Derek Watson¹*, Stanley Yap², Sophia Pandi³, John Husband⁴ and Fanos Tekelas⁵

¹Senior Lecturer, University of Sunderland, UK
²Associate Professor, SEGi University, Malaysia
³PhD Research Student, University of Sunderland, UK
⁴Director, Consultancy and e-Learning, Totrain Company, UK
⁵Research Fellow, The Cyprus School of Business, UK

*Corresponding Author: Derek Watson, Senior Lecturer, University of Sunderland, UK.

Received: February 23, 2018; Published: March 21, 2018

DOI: 10.31080/ASMI.2018.01.0039

Citation: Derek Watson., et al. “BREXIT and the Implications of Food Safety Cultural Compliance in the Food Manufacturing Sector”. Acta Scientific Microbiology 1.4 (2018).

Abstract

  In theory food safety is a critical measurement, not just for economic and legal reasons but also for the moral integrity of the or - ganisation. However, in reality, the number of accidents or incidents particularly in the food manufacturing sector is a serious cause for concern. The problem is further compounded with the onset of Brexit. Given the UK government’s floundering negotiation talks and the pending conservative leadership challenge, it has resulted in a climate of uncertainty, a devaluation of currency and economic instability. Food manufacturers along with other commercial businesses are reluctant to further invest until the economic future is more transparent. In consequence, food manufacturers are seeking efficiency savings, whilst aiming not to compromise food safety compliance. Whilst there are areas of best practice, sadly there are an increasing number of examples in which failure to comply to food safety is resulting in lost of business, serious injury and in certain cases fatalities. This paper addresses Food Safety Cultural Compliance within UK Food Manufacturers and identifies core issues that hinder the establishment of a proactive food safety culture. The research study adopts a mixed methods approach in which five UK food manufacturers were consulted via 15 semi-structured interviews with management and three focused groups. The data collected clearly indicates a commitment to food safety compliance. However, the majority of organisations struggled to maintain consistent levels of food safety compliance despite implementing costly training and development initiatives. Their strategic and operational drive to both enhance and maintain a positive food safety cul - ture was also undermined with the uncertainty of economic pressures and the quagmire of Brexit. The paper concludes with a series of commercially viable recommendations within the context of the Brexit divorce and provides a clear contribution to the community of practice.

Keywords: Brexit; Food-Manufacturers; Food-Safety; Culture; Compliance

Bibliography

1. Pending--
2. . Halder D., et al . “Indigenous probiotic lactobacillus isolates presenting antibiotic like activity against human patho- genic bacteria”. Biomedicines 5.2 (2017): E31.
3. Paczosa MK., et al . “Klebsiella pneumoniae: going on the offense with a strong defense”. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 80.3 (2016): 629-661.
4. Lebeaux D., et al . “Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental as- pects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics”. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 78.3 (2014): 510-543.
5. Halder D and Mandal S. “Antibacterial potentiality of com- mercially available probiotic lactobacilli and curd lacto- bacilli strains, alone and in combination, against human pathogenic bacteria”. Translational Biomedicine 7 (2016): 2.
6. Halder D and Mandal S. “Curd lactobacilli with probiotic potentiality”. Translational Biomedicine 6.2 (2015): 1-6.
7. Lagrafeuille R., et al . “Opposing effect of Lactobacillus on in vitro Klebsiella pneumoniae in biofilm and in an in vivo intestinal colonisation model”. Beneficial Microbes 9.1 (2017): 87-100.
8. Al-Mathkhury., et al . “Inhibitory effect of lactobacilli fil - trate on Klebsiella pneumoniae Biofilm”. The Iraqi Post - graduate Medical Journal 11.1 (2012): 168-179.
9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI): Per - formance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility test- ing (2011) 21^st informational supplement M100S21. CLSI, Wayne, Pa (2011).
10. Nandi S and Mandal S. “Bacteriological profiling of com - mercially available eye cosmetics and their antibiotic sus- ceptibility pattern”. Translational Biomedicine 7.3 (2016): 1-8.
11. Shokryazdan P., et al . “Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains with antimicrobial activity against some human pathogenic strains”. BioMed Research International (2014).
12. Carasi P., et al . “Safety characterization and antimicrobial properties of kefir-isolated Lactobacillus kefiri”. BioMed Research International (2014): 208974.
13. Pisano MB., et al . “Preliminary evaluation of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from Sardinian dairy products”. BioMed Research International (2014): 286390.
14. Iyapparaj P., et al . “Optimization of bacteriocin produc- tion by Lactobacillus sp. MSU3IR against shrimp bacterial pathogens”. Aquatic Biosystems 9.1 (2013): 12.
15. Yu WL and Chuang YC. “Clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae infection” (2018).
16. Lu CH., et al . “Klebsiella pneumoniae meningitis: analysis on clinical features of thirty-two adult patients”. Chinese Medi- cal Journal 60.6 (1997): 296-302.
17. Lin WP., et al . “The Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae from community settings in Taiwan, a trend analysis”. Scientific Reports 6 (2016): 36280.
18. Gupta N., et al . “Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Epidemiology and prevention”. Clinical Infectious Diseases 53.1 (2011): 60-67.
19. Collado MC., et al . “The impact of probiotic on gut health”. Current Drug Metabolism 10.1 (2009): 68-78.
20. Corr SC., et al . “Understanding the mechanisms by which probiotics inhibit gastrointestinal pathogens”. Advance Food and Nutrition Research 56 (2009): 1-15.
21. Sanchez B., et al . “Extracellular proteins secreted by probi- otic bacteria as mediators of effects that promote mucosa- bacteria interactions”. Microbiology 156.11 (2010) 3232- 3242.
22. Vuotto C., et al . “Probiotics to counteract biofilm-associated infections: promising and conflicting data”. International Journal of Oral Science 6.4 (2014) 189-194.
23. Saranya S and Hemashenpagam N. “Antagonistic activity and antibiotic sensitivity of Lactic acid bacteria from fer - mented dairy products”. Advances in Applied Science Re- search 2.4 (2011): 528-534.
24. Kormin S., et al . “Bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional fermented food”. Malaysian Jour - nal of Medical Sciences 8.1(2001): 63-68.
25. Shehata MG., et al . “Screening of isolated potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria for cholesterol lowering property and bile salt hydrolase activity”. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 61.1 (2016): 65-75.

Copyright: © 2018 Shyamapada Mandal and Debashis Halder. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.