Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in Implant Dentistry: From Biological
Properties to Clinical Applications: A Mini Review
Samar Fawki El Desouki1*, Hadeel Gamal Al Malahy1, Nashwa
El-Khazragy2, Ahmed Elsayed Hamed Amr1
1Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology and Oral Diagnosis, Faculty of Den-
tistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
2Department of clinical pathology/Hematology Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams
University, Cairo, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Samar Fawki El Desouki, Master of Periodontology,
Faculty of Dentistry, Oral Medicine, Periodontology and Oral Diagnosis, Ain shams
University, Egypt.
Received:
June 12, 2026; Published: July 02, 2026
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has emerged as a promising biomaterial in implant dentistry due to its favorable mechanical
properties, biocompatibility, chemical stability, and esthetic appearance. Originally introduced in orthopedic applications, PEEK has
gained increasing attention as an alternative to conventional metallic materials in implant-related treatments. Its elastic modulus
is closer to that of cortical bone than titanium, potentially improving stress distribution around implant-supported restorations. In
addition, its radiolucency, reduced plaque accumulation and compatibility with CAD/CAM technologies have expanded its clinical
applications. Recent studies have reported encouraging outcomes regarding soft tissue response, bacterial adhesion, and the use of
PEEK in healing abutments, provisional restorations and implant-supported prostheses. However, the bioinert nature of untreated
PEEK remains a challenge, necessitating the development of surface modification strategies to enhance tissue integration. The purpose
of this mini review is to highlight recent evidence regarding material characteristics, biological properties, microbial interactions,
and clinical applications of PEEK in implant dentistry, while discussing current limitations and future research directions.
Keywords: PEEK; Polyetheretherketone; Dental Implants; Healing Abutments; Peri-implant Soft Tissue
References
- Bornstein MM., et al. “Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 5 (2003): 659-666.
- Kim YJ., et al. “Current understanding of the etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and management of peri-implant diseases: a narrative review for the consensus report of the Korean Academy of Periodontology”. Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science6 (2024): 377.
- Lee H Kyu., et al. “Soft-tissue volume augmentation using a connective tissue graft and a volume-stable collagen matrix with polydeoxyribonucleotide for immediate implant placement: a pilot study in a dog model”. Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science5 (2024): 359.
- Neumann EAF., et al. “Fracture resistance of abutment screws made of titanium, polyetheretherketone, and carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone”. Brazilian Oral Research1 (2014).
- Wu H., et al. “Mechanical and Biological Properties of Titanium and Its Alloys for Oral Implant with Preparation Techniques: A Review”. Materials 16 (2023): 6860.
- Kurtz SM and Devine JN. “PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants”. Biomaterials 32 (2007): 4845-4869.
- Ortega-Martínez J., et al. “Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a medical and dental material. A literature review”. Medical Research Archives4 (2017).
- Papathanasiou I., et al. “The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review”. BMC Oral Health1 (2020): 217.
- Jahangiri M., et al. “Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in Dental Implantology: A Systematic Review”. Journal of Dental School (2025).
- Irudhayam SJ and Hariram V. “A Brief Review on PEEK as biomaterial, Importance of Implant Design, 3D Printing and FEA in Dental Implant”. E3S Web of Conferences 491 (2024): 1017.
- Najeeb S., et al. “Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics”. Journal of Prosthodontic Research1 (2016): 12-19.
- Berglundh T., et al. “Morphogenesis of the peri-implant mucosa: an experimental study in dogs”. Clinical Oral Implants Research1 (2007): 1-8.
- Caballé-Serrano J., et al. “Soft tissue response to dental implant closure caps made of either polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or titanium”. Clinical Oral Implants Research8 (2019): 808-816.
- Peng TY., et al. “Biofilm Formation on the Surface of (Poly)Ether-Ether-Ketone and In Vitro Antimicrobial Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy on Peri-Implant Mucositis”. Polymers 13 (2021): 940.
- Beretta M., et al. “Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Conditioning by Means of Customized Healing Abutment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial”. Materials (Basel)18 (2019).
- Bezerra FJB., et al. “Clinical application of the customizable PEEK healing abutment. A case report”. Journal of Multidisciplinary Dentistry1 (2020): 93-96.
- Shenoy A., et al. “Assessing the role of PEKK implant material on cytotoxicity, inflammatory response, and molecular interactions with pro-inflammatory cytokines: An in-vitro and in-silico study”. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research 6 (2025): 1218-23.
- Wong JX., et al. “Bioengineered Polyhydroxyalkanoates as Immobilized Enzyme Scaffolds for Industrial Applications”. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8 (2020).
- Moharil S., et al. “Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Biomaterial: An Overview”. Cureus (2023).
- Hahnel S., et al. “Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials”. Clinical Oral Implants Research11 (2015): 1297-301.
- Heitz-Mayfield LJA. “Peri-implant diseases: Diagnosis and risk indicators”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 35 (2008): 292-304.
- Papathanasiou I., et al. “The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review”. BMC Oral Health1 (2020).
Citation
Copyright