Repair Versus Replacement of Defective Direct Restorations -A Cross-Sectional Study among
Dentists in Central India
Meshram Rishikesh K1*, Sathawane Nikhil2 and Kelapure Manjiri3
1 Professor, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur,
Maharashtra, India
2Associate Professor, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital,
Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
3Student, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur,
Maharashtra, India
*Corresponding Author: Meshram Rishikesh K, Professor, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh
Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Received:
December 10, 2024; Published: December 31, 2024
Abstract
Background: This study focuses on the preferences of Indian dentists regarding the management of defective composite restora
tions, specifically examining the choice between repair and replacement.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire administered to active 115 dentists practicing in
central India. This survey aimed to collect data on their clinical experiences, viewpoints, and protocols for treating damaged restora
tions.
Results: The findings indicate a diverse range of practices influenced by factors such as patient demographics, material concerns,
and the severity of damage. This trend may be attributed to cost considerations, patient preferences, and a growing awareness of the
environmental impact of dental materials.
Conclusion: The study highlights the challenges dentists face in implementing repair techniques, including a lack of training and
material availability. It underscores the need for enhanced educational initiatives and resources to promote evidence-based practices
in restorative dentistry.
Practical Implications: The findings emphasize the importance of context-specific guidelines that consider both clinical efficacy and
patient-centered care, contributing valuable insights to the ongoing discourse on restorative strategies.
Keywords: Composite Restorations; Repair Versus Replacement; Dentist Preferences; Restorative Dentistry; India; Cross-Sectional
Study
References
- Burke FJT., et al. “Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. services in England and Wales (part 2): variation by patients’ characteristics”. Journal of Dentistry 33 (2005): 817-826.
- Lucarotti PSK., et al. “Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and wales (part 3): variation by dentist factors”. Journal of Dentistry 33 (2005): 827-835.
- Lucarotti PSK., et al. “Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (part 1): variation by type of restoration and re-invention”. Journal of Dentistry 33 (2005): 805-815.
- Hickel R and Manhart J. “Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure”. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3 (2001): 45-64.
- Pink FE., et al. “Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings”. Operative Dentistry 19 (1994): 127-132.
- Friedl KH., et al. “Placement and replacement of amalgam in Germany”. Operative Dentistry 20 (1995): 34-33.
- Deligeorgi V., et al. “An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations”. Prime Dental Care 8 (2001): 5-11.
- Mjör IA., et al. “Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland”. Operative Dentistry 27 (2002): 117-123.
- Wafaa Kattan., et al. “Repair versus replacement of defective direct restorations A cross-sectional study among US dentists”. The Journal of the American Dental Association 11 (2021): 927-935.
- Mjör IA. “The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice”. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1 (1997): 58-63.
- Mjör IA., et al. “Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice”. International Dental Journal 6 (2000): 361-366.
- Moncado G., et al. “Sealing, refurbishment and repair of class I and class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial”. JADA4 (1990): 425-432.
- Moncado G., et al. “Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial”. Operative Dentistry 3 (2008): 258-264.
- Mjör IA. “Repair versus replacement of failed resto rations”. International Dental Journal 5 (1993): 466-472.
- Ettinger RL. “Restoring the ageing dentition: repair or replacement?” International Dental Journal 5 (1990): 275-282.
- Gordan VV., et al. “Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations”. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 3 (2006): 144 153.
- Fernández EM., et al. “Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up”. Brazilian Dental Journal 2 (2011): 134-139.
- Gordan VV., et al. “Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group. Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network”. JADA 6 (2012): 593-601.
- Gordan VV., et al. “National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. The decision to repair or replace a defective restoration is affected by who placed the original restoration: findings from the National Dental PBRN”. Journal of Dentistry12 (2014): 1528-1534.
- Gordan VV., et al. “DPBRN Collaborative Group. How dentists diagnose and treat defective restorations: evidence from the dental practice based research network”. Operative Dentistry 6 (2009): 664-673.
- Heaven TJ., et al. “National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. Agreement among dentists’ restorative treatment planning thresholds for primary occlusal caries, primary proximal caries, and existing restorations: findings from The National Dental Practice Based Research Network”. Journal of Dentistry 8 (2013): 718-725.
- Tyas MJ., et al. “Minimal intervention dentistry: a review, FDI Commission Project 1-97”. International Dental Journal 1 (2000): 1-12.
- da Costa JB., et al. “Council on Scientific Affairs. Defective restoration repair or replacement”. JADA 4 (2021): 329-330.
- Kanzow P., et al. “Understanding the management and teaching of dental restoration repair: systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys”. Journal of Dentistry 69 (2018): 1-21.
- Gordan VV., et al. “Teaching students the repair of resin-based composite restorations: a survey of North American dental schools”. JADA3 (2003): 317-323.
- Lynch CD., et al. “Repair or replacement of defective direct resin-based composite restorations: contemporary teaching in US and Canadian dental schools”. JADA2 (2012): 157-163.
- Kanzow P., et al. “Attitudes, practice, and experience of German dentists regarding repair restorations”. Clinical Oral Investigations 4 (2017): 1087-1093.
- Maria A., et al. “Attitudes of Greek dentists towards repair of conservative restorations: an online survey”. International Dental Journal 6 (2017): 351-359.
- Kanzow P and Wiegand A. “Teaching of composite restoration repair: trends and quality of teaching over the past 20 years”. Journal of Dentistry 95 (2020): 103303.
- Hickel R., et al. “Repair of restorations: criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations”. Dental Materials 1 (2013): 28-50.
- Moncado G., et al. “Longitudinal results of a 10-year clinical trial of repair of amalgam restorations”. Operative Dentistry 1 (2015): 34-43.
- Fernández E., et al. “Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial”. Journal of Dentistry 2 (2015): 279-286.
- , et al. “Same, same, but different? A systematic review of protocols for restoration repair”. Journal of Dentistry 86 (2019): 1-16.
- Blum IR., et al. “Factors influencing repair of dental restorations with resin composite”. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry 6 (2014): 81-87.
- Opdam NJM., et al. “Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice-based study”. Journal of Dentistry 10 (2012):829 835.
- Hatipoglu Ö and Arıcıoglu B. “Repair versus replacement: a questionnaire examining the repair preferences of Turkish dentists in dental restorations”. Swiss Dental Journal 5 (2019): 1-6.
- Lo Sasso AT., et al. “Practice settings and dentists’ job satisfaction”. JADA 8 (2015): 600-609.
Citation
Copyright