ACTA SCIENTIFIC CLINICAL CASE REPORTS

Research Article Volume 8 Issue 7

Evaluating the Results for Different Methods of Internal Fixation Treating Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures

Mohammed Mahdi Baraja1*, Lutf Alrahbi2 and Ahmed Al Ashwal2

1Maxillofacial Department, AL Thora Hospital, Yemeni Board Sanaa, Yemen
2Maxillofacial Department, Sanaa University, Yemen

*Corresponding Author:Mohammed Mahdi Baraja, Maxillofacial Department, AL Thora Hospital, Yemeni Board Sanaa, Yemen.

Received: May 07, 2024; Published: June 05, 2024

Abstract

Among maxillofacial injuries, condylar fractures are a common topic of discussion and controversy. These fractures make up 11-16% of all facial fractures and 30-40% of mandibular fractures. The subcondylar area is the distal part of the condylar process, which is superiorly confined to the line passing through the sigmoid notch and anteriorly to the line obliquely connecting the sigmoid notch to the masseter tuberosity. Closed reduction has been the preferred treatment for decades, but complications such as pain, ankylosis, internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and inadequate restoration of the vertical height of the ramus can possibly occur. Open reduction and anatomic reduction can create a better function for the temporomandibular joint compared with closed treatment. For subcondylar fractures, surgical treatment is most commonly done, and different treatment options have been described in adults. Among them, the mini plates fixation technique via retromandibular or submandibular incision was used. The retromandibular approaches provide good visualization of the subcondyle from the posterior edge of the ramus, allow the surgeon to work perpendicularly to the fracture, and enable direct fracture management.

Keywords: Sub Condylar Fractures; Single Y Shape Condylar Plate; Open Reduction Retromandibular Approach

References

  1. Gupta M., et al. “Analysis of different treatment protocols for fractures of condylar process of mandible”.Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery1 (2012): 83-91.
  2. Chrcanovic BR. “Factors influencing the incidence of maxillofacial fractures”. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery1 (2012): 3-17.
  3. Chrcanovic BR., et al. “Facial fractures in children and adolescents: a retrospective study of 3 years in a hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil”. Dental Traumatology 3 (2010): 262-270.
  4. Chrcanovic BR., et al. “Facial fractures: a 1-year retrospective study in a hospital in Belo Horizonte”.Brazilian Oral Research 4 (2004): 322-328.
  5. Chrcanovic BR., et al. “Facial fractures in the elderly: a retrospective study in a hospital in Belo Horizonte. Brazil”. Journal of Trauma6 (2010): 73-78.
  6. Chrcanovic BR., et al. “1,454 mandibular fractures: a 3-year study in a hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil”.Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery2 (2012): 116-123.
  7. Zandi M., et al. “Maxillofacial injuries in western Iran: a prospective study”. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery4 (2011): 201-209.
  8. Hackenberg B., et al. “Management of subcondylar mandible fractures in the adult patient”. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery1 (2014): 166-171.
  9. Jain G., et al. “Temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a review of 44 cases”. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery2 (2008): 61-66.
  10. Lee HC., et al. “Outcome of open reduction via retromandibular approach for mandibular subcondyle fracture”. Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 32 (2005): 739-743.
  11. Jang Jy and Kang DH. “Comparison study of open reduction and closed reduction in treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures”. Journal of the Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 9 (2008): 51-54.
  12. Kleinheinz J and Meyer C. “Fractures of the mandibular condyle: basic considerations and treatment. London: Quintessence Publishing Compan (2009).
  13. Hinds EC and Girotti WJ. “Vertical subcondylar osteotomy: a reappraisal”. Journal of Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery, Oral Pathology 24 (1967): 164-170.
  14. Cienfuegos R., et al. “Mandible: retromandibular approaches. Switzerland: AO Foundation (2011).
  15. Yang WG., et al. “Functional results of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures after open and closed treatment”. Journal of Trauma 3 (2002): 498-503.
  16. Dong Hee Kang. “Mandibular Condyle Fracture”. Archives of Plastic Surgery4 (2012): 284-290.
  17. Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma FONSECA fourth edition.
  18. Silverman SL. “A new operation for displaced fractures at the neck of the mandibular condyle”. Dental Cosmos 67 (1925): 876-877.
  19. Rajesh Kshirsagar., et al. “Retromandibular approach in the management of condylar fractures by open reduction and internal fixation a prospective study”. National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery 6.2 (2015): 180-184.
  20. MA Ahmed and MA Islam. “Outcome of Reduction of Subcondylar Fracture in Retromandibular Transparotid Approach”. Mymensingh Medical Journal4 (2022): 931-936.
  21. Alireza Parhiz., et al. “Clinical Assessment of Retromandibular Antero-Parotid Approach for Reduction of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures: Report of 60 Cases and Review of the Literature”. Frontier Dental 17 (2020): 17.
  22. Satish K Pugazhendi., et al. “A comparative evaluation of the outcome of treating condylar fractures with the mini retromandibular and the preauricular approaches”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology 4 (2013): 305-309.
  23. Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed., et al. “Is the retromandibular approach a suitable approach to anatomical reduction of unilateral subcondylar fracture? A non-randomized clinical trial”. Head and Face Medicine.
  24. Gökhan Göçmen., et al. “Retromandibular transparotid approach for subcondylar mandibular fractures: A retrospective study. “Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul-Turkey.
  25. Saponaro A., et al. “Magnetic resonance imaging in the postsurgical evaluation of patients with mandibular condyle fractures treated using the transparotid approach: our experience”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 67 (2009):1815-1820.
  26. Brandt MT and Haug RH. “Open versus closed reduction of adult mandibular condyle fractures: a review of the literature regarding the evolution of current thoughts on management”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 61 (2003): 1324-1332.
  27. Klatt J., et al. “Clinical follow-up examination of surgically treated fractures of the condylar process using the trans parotid approach”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 3 (2010): 611-617.
  28. Surgical Approaches to Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Condylar Fractures Takahiro KANNO Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane 693-8501.
  29. Al-Moraissi EA., et al. “Does the surgical approach for treating mandibular condylar fractures affect the rate of seventh cranial nerve injuries? A systematic review and metaanalysis based on a new classification for surgical approaches”. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 46 (2018): 398- 412.
  30. Kanno T., et al. “Surgical Approaches for Mandibular Condylar Fractures 93 Furuki Y. Submandibular approach through the submandibular gland fascia for treating mandibular fractures without identifying the facial nerve”. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 68 (2010): 641-643.
  31. AO Surgery Reference. CMF, Mandible: Fractures of the condylar process and head (2020).
  32. Neff A., et al. “Position paper from the IBRA Symposium on Surgery of the Head--the 2nd International Symposium for Condylar Fracture Osteosynthesis, Marseille, France 2012”. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 42 (2014): 1234-1249.
  33. T Imai., et al. “Surgical approaches for condylar fractures related to facial nerve injury: deep versus superficial dissection”. International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 48 (2019): 1227-1234.

Citation

Citation: Mohammed Mahdi Baraja., et al. “Evaluating the Results for Different Methods of Internal Fixation Treating Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 8.7 (2024): 02-05g.

Copyright

Copyright: Mohammed Mahdi Baraja., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.278

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.

Contact US









ff

© 2024 Acta Scientific, All rights reserved.