Claudinei Ferriera Noia¹, Leandro Lécio de Lima Sousa²* and Claudio Ferreira Noia¹

¹Centro de Pós-Graduação Para Estrangeiros, Rio Branco, AC, Brazil
²RIDGE - Research Implant Dentistry and Graft Expertise: Periodontology and Implantology Dep, Brazil

*Corresponding Author: Leandro Lécio de Lima Sousa, RIDGE - Research Implant Dentistry and Graft Expertise: Periodontology and Implantology Dep, Brazil.

Received: February 23, 2024; Published: March 06, 2024

Abstract

The aim of this study is to report our experience with the collagen membrane through its use in 25 cases in recent years and also to present our series of articles published in recent years using this product.
Alveolar bone resorption is a constant post-extraction alteration. This is because the alveolar process has the function of supporting the teeth and, once this function is lost, it tends to be gradually resorbed [1-4]. This process of resorption constantly culminates in bone defects regarding height, thickness, or associated aspects, and they often preclude installation of dental implants, making it necessary to perform a bone graft first.
The sample included 25 patients, 14 female and 11 male, with an average age of 48 years (range 25-65 years), who sought treatment with a view to installing dental implants and after clinical and tomographic assessment were found to require bone augmentation.
The phenomenon of soft-tissue invagination into the reconstruction site occurs because this tissue has a healing process piloted by fibroblasts, which are cells that have rapid and considerable proliferation capacity, whereas bone tissue incorporation is dependent on osteoblasts, whose proliferation process occurs more slowly. When the grafts in which the Lumina Coat membrane was used were reopened, they were found to be in an advanced state of incorporation, ensuring secure implant insertion.
The use of the Lumina Coat membrane proved to be viable and predictable in optimizing surgical outcomes, with low rates of complications and excellent clinical safety, and its use by clinical professionals is highly recommended.

Keywords: Collagen Membrane; Celullar Exclusion; Bone Grafts

References

1. Choi BH., et al. “Use of the sandwich osteotomy plus an inter-positional allograft for vertical augmentation of the alveolar ridge”. Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery 32 (2004): 51-54.
2. Jensen OT. “Alveolar segmental “sandwich” osteotomies for posterior edentulous mandibular sites for dental implants”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 64 (2006): 471-475.
3. Bormann KH., et al. “Sandwich osteotomy for vertical and transversal augmentation of the posterior mandible”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 39 (2010): 554-560.
4. Hashemi HM and Javidi B. “Comparison between interpositional bone grafting and os-teogenic alveolar distraction in alveolar bone reconstruction”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 68 (2010): 1853-1858.
5. Politi M and Robiony M. “Localized alveolar sandwich osteotomy for vertical augmentation of the anterior maxilla”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 57 (1999): 1380-1382.
6. Jensen OT., et al. “Alveolar segmental sandwich osteotomy for anterior maxillary vertical augmentation prior to implant placement”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 64 (2006): 290-296.
7. Kluppel LE., et al. “Reconstruções em implantodontia, protocolos clínicos para o sucesso e previsibilidade”. Mazzonetto R, ed. Nova Odessa, Brazil: Napoleão (2008): 250-280.
8. López-Cedrun JL. “Implant rehabilitation of the edentulous posterior atrophic man-dible: The sandwich osteotomy revisited”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 26 (2011): 195-202.
9. Schettler D and Holtermann W. “Clinical and experimental results of a sandwich- technique for mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation”. Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery 5 (1977): 199-202.
10. Nóia CF., et al. “Segmental osteotomy with inter-positional bone grafting in the posterior maxillary region”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 41 (2012): 1563-1565.
11. Bormann KH., et al. “Forty sandwich osteotomies in atrophic mandibles: A retrospective study”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 69 (2011): 1562-1570.
12. Laviv A., et al. “Alveolar sandwich osteotomy in resorbed alveolar ridge for dental implants: A 4-year prospective study”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 72 (2014): 292-303.
13. Bell RE. “Palatal approach to the anterior maxillary sandwich osteotomy”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 71 (2013): 1005-1009.
14. Triaca A., et al. “New perspectives in the treatment of se-vere mandibular atrophy: “double sandwich” osteotomy”. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 52 (2014): 664-666.
15. Felice P., et al. “Guided “sandwich” technique: A novel sur-gical approach for safe osteotomies in the treatment of vertical bone defects in the posteri-or atrophic mandible: A case report”. Implant Dentistry 23 (2014): 738-744.
16. Feng Xuan F., et al. “Vertical ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone blocks: A comparison between the flap and tunneling procedures”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 72 (2014): 1660-1670.
17. Bergamaschi IP., et al. “Alternativas para reabilitação com implantes dentários em mandíbula posterior atrófica”. Full Dental Science45 (2020): 16-23.
18. Ventura de Souza CS., et al. “Split Crest Technique with Immediate Implant to Treat Horizontal Defects of the Alveolar Ridge: Analysis of Increased Thickness and Im-plant Survival”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery4 (2020): 498-505.
19. Petean HC., et al. “Expansão cirúrgica do rebordo mandibular e instalação simul-tânea de implantes dentários”. inperio 2 (2019): 294-300
20. Nóia CF. Técnica Tent Pole para tratamento de defeito vertical do rebordo”. Full Dental Science39 (2019): 14-16.
21. Guillen GA., et al. “Expansão Cirúrgica do Rebordo Alveolar com Instalação Sim-ultânea de Implantes Dentários”. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 4 (2018): 589-594.
22. Ferreira AJ., et al. “Abordagem cirúrgica para levantamento do soalho do seio maxilar nos casos de presença de septo sinusal”. Full Dental Science35 (2018): 11-16.
23. Noia CF., et al. “Sandwich Osteotomies to Treat Vertical Defects of the Alveolar Ridge”. Implant Dentistry1 (2017): 101-105.
24. Noia CF., et al. “Tratamento da Atrofia Vertical Posterior de Mandíbula Através de Osteotomia Sandwich: Série de Casos”. JOMI BRASIL2 (2016): 278-273.
25. Nóia CF., et al. “Clinical considerations for optimizing re- sults in bone grafting: Part II”. Dental Press Implantology1 (2015): 88-103.
26. NÓIA C F., et al. “Repositioning implants through sandwich os-teotomy with the interposition of lyophilized bovine bone”. International Journal of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2 (2015): 455-459.
27. ROCHA P B., et al. “Considerations on the use of xenogenous bone blocks in implantology: A case report”. International Journal of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2 (2015): 469-474.
28. Noia CF., et al. “Association between autogenous bone and heterogen graft to op-timize outcomes of bone grafting: a case report”. Dental Press Implantology4 (2014): 50-59.
29. Nóia CF., et al. “Clinical considerations for optimizing results in bone grafting: Part I”. Dental Press Implantology3 (2014): 96-108.
30. Nóia CF., et al. “Segmental oste-otomy with interpositional bone grafting in the posterior maxillary region”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 41 (2012): 1563-1565.
31. Andrade VC., et al. “Osteotomia segmentar com enxerto ósseo interposicional em Implantodontia”. Revista Implantnews2 (2011): 207-211.

Citation

Citation: Leandro Lécio de Lima Sousa., et al. “Use of Resorbable Membrane in Combination with Bone Grafts".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 8.4 (2024): 06-11.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Leandro Lécio de Lima Sousa., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.