Sarra Nasri¹*, Sabra Jaâfoura², Mohamed Chebil¹, Ines Azouzi³, Dalenda Hadyaoui¹, Moncef Ommezzine¹, Zohra Nouira¹, Jilani Saafi¹, Belhassan Harzallah¹ and Mounir Cherif¹

¹Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Monastir, Avicenna Avenue, Monastir, Tunisia
²Department of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Monastir, Avicenna Avenue, 5000 Tunisia
³Laboratory of Dento-Facial, Clinical and Biological Approach (ABCDF) LR12ES10, University of Monastir, Avicenna Avenue, Monastir, Tunisia

*Corresponding Author: Sarra Nasri, Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Monastir, Avicenna Avenue, Monastir, Tunisia.

Received: October 20, 2023; Published: November 21, 2023

Abstract

Introduction: This study has for purpose to report a comprehensive description of dental implant system selection criteria among a sample of dentists practicing implantology in Tunisia.

Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was developed and sent to 120 dentists independently of their specialty. Responses were compiled and analyzed using the SPSS 21 Software.

Results: Among 120 questionnaires distributed, we had 94 responses. Practically, half of the sample was composed of general practitioners. Clinical track record was the most important factor (86%), in addition to brand image (61, 16%). The compatibility with CAD/CAM system used in laboratory and technician’s recommendations were the least important.

Conclusion: according to the results of this survey, most respondents agreed on the importance of clinical track record, the variety of implant dimensions and prosthetic accessories proposed, and the type of implant/abutment connection in addition to scientific evidence available on implant systems.

Keywords:Oral Health Surveys; Dental Implant; Implant System

References

1. Griggs JA. “Dental Implants”. Dental clinics of North America 61.4 (2017): 857-871.
2. Davarpanah M S-M. “Manuel d’implantologie Clinique”. 3ème édition ed (2012).
3. Hunt PR., et al. “Choice of a dental implant system. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995) 26.4 (2005): 239-240.
4. Eckert SE., et al. “Comparison of dental implant systems: quality of clinical evidence and prediction of 5-year survival”. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 20.3 (2005): 406-415.
5. Essi M-J and Njoya O. “L'enquête CAP en recherche médicale”. Health Sciences and Diseases 14.2 (2013).
6. Al-Wahadni A., et al. “Dentists' Most Common Practices when Selecting an Implant System”. Journal of Prosthodontics: Official Journal of the American College of Prosthodontists 27.3 (2018): 250-259.
7. Eckert SE., et al. “Survey of implant experience by prosthodontists in the United States”. Journal of Prosthodontics: Official Journal of the American College of Prosthodontists 11.3 (2002): 194-201.
8. Watson M. “Specialist role in implant dentistry rooted in history. A survey on periodontists and maxillofacial surgeons”. Dental Products Report 17.14 (1997): 8.
9. Ng PC., et al. “Dental implant practice among Hong Kong general dental practitioners in 2004 and 2008”. Implant Dentistry 20.1 (2011): 95-105.
10. Esposito M., et al. “A 5-year follow-up comparative analysis of the efficacy of various osseointegrated dental implant systems: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials”. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 20.4 (2005): 557-568.
11. Abichandani S., et al. “Abutment selection, designing, and its influence on the emergence profile: A comprehensive review (2013): 1.
12. Nazarian A. “Easier Implant Restoration: CAD/CAM Generated Implant Abutments (2009).
13. Schneider A and Kurtzman G. “Computerized milled solid implant abutments utilized at second stage”. Surgery (2001): 416-420.
14. Meng JC., et al. “Influence of connection geometry on dynamic micromotion at the implant-abutment interface”. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 20.6 (2007): 623-625.
15. Atieh MA., et al. “Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Journal of Periodontology 81.10 (2010): 1350-1366.
16. Cheung MC., et al. “Interest in dental implantology and preferences for implant therapy: a survey of Victorian dentists”. Australian Dental Journal 61.4 (2016): 455-463.
17. Ma S and Fenton A. “Screw- versus cement-retained implant prostheses: a systematic review of prosthodontic maintenance and complications”. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 28.2 (2015): 127-145.
18. Sailer I., et al. “Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates”. Clinical Oral Implants Research 23.6 (2012): 163-201.
19. Mijiritsky E. “Plastic temporary abutments with provisional restorations in immediate loading procedures: a clinical report”. Implant Dentistry 15.3 (2006): 236-240.
20. Dumbrigue HB., et al. “Options for the fabrication of provisional restorations for ITI solid abutments”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 86.6 (2001): 658-661.
21. Osman RB and Swain MV. “A Critical Review of Dental Implant Materials with an Emphasis on Titanium versus Zirconia”. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 8.3 (2015): 932.
22. Jokstad A., et al. “Quality of dental implants”. International Dental Journal 53.6-2 (2003): 409-443.

Citation

Citation: Sarra Nasri., et al. “Criteria of Choice of Dental Implant Systems among Tunisian Dentists".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 7.12 (2023): 29-34.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Sarra Nasri., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.