Aliaa El-hossiny Ebrahim¹*, Mohamed Said Hamed², Mohamed Ahmed El-Sholkamy², Ahmad El-Rawdy³

¹Demonstrator at Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
²Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
³Associate Professor in Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

*Corresponding Author: Aliaa El-hossiny Ebrahim, Demonstrator at Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Received: October 20, 2023; Published: November 09, 2023

Abstract

Background: To allow sufficient time for the socket to heal, clinicians typically waited several months after tooth extraction before placing an implant. In 1976, Schulte and Heimke introduced the concept of immediate implant placement. Anneroth., et al. published the first study with an animal model. Then, in 1989, Lazzara reported a case of Immediately place the implant in the socket of the extracted tooth in human. Today, placing the implant right into the socket after tooth extraction is common practice and several studies have shown this procedure to have a high success rate. Recent developments in photonics technology and better knowledge of light-tissue interactions have produced significant advances in traditional medicine. The use of lasers and high-dose light devices in dentistry today is widespread for many clinical applications. Many studies have examined the use of photobiomodulation for the restoration of soft tissues in the mouth. These studies suggest that vascular proliferation is responsible for the anti-inflammatory and anti-edematous effects. Furthermore, the authors agree that the metabolic changes induced by low-intensity laser therapy promote tissue regeneration as well as cell proliferation and survival dependent recovery. on the dose applied, i.e. the appropriate density and energy. Several studies have examined the effect of low-intensity lasers on bone remodeling mechanisms, but controversial, suggesting that further studies are needed to be certain of the intensity of laser therapy. How low-intensity lasers affect bone tissue.

Objectives: to evaluate the role of low-level laser therapy on osseointegration of immediate implant in mandible in the anterior and premolar region.

Keywords: Immediate; Implants; Extraction; Low-Level; Laser; Radiographic

References

1. Abraham CM. “A brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treatments”. The Open Dentistry Journal 8 (2014): 50-55.
2. Crespi R., et al. “Fresh-Socket Implants in Periapical Infected Sites in Humans”. Journal of Periodontology 13(2010): 378-383.
3. Gaviria L., et al. “Current trends in dental implants”. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2 (2014): 50-60.
4. Jang HW., et al. “A retrospective study on related factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants”. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics4 (2011): 204-215.
5. Jawad MM., et al. “Effect of 940 nm low-level laser therapy on osteogenesis in vitro”. Journal of Biomedical Optics 18 (2013):128001.
6. Tsiklakis K., et al. “Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT”. European Journal of Radiology 56 (2005):413-417.
7. Ganz SD. “Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts”. Dental Clinics of North America 55 (2011): 515-536.
8. Cremonini CC., et al. “Assessment of linear measurements of bone for implant sites in the presence of metallic artefacts using cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 40 (2011):845-850.
9. Brånemark PI. “The osseointegration book: from calvarium to calcaneus”. Quintessence (2005).
10. Renvert S., et al. “Treatment of peri-implantitis using an Er: yAG laser or an air-abrasive device: a randomized clinical trial”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 38 (2011): 65-73.
11. Khadra M., et al. “Effect of laser therapy on attachment, proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblast-like cells cultured on titanium implant material”. Biomaterials 26 (2005): 3503-3509.
12. Romão MMA., et al. “Micro-computed tomography and histomorphometric analysis of human alveolar bone repair induced by laser phototherapy: a pilot study”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 12 (2015): 1521-1528.
13. Mayer L., et al. “Histologic and resonance frequency analysis of peri-implant bone healing after low-level laser therapy: an in vivo study”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 5 (2015):1028-1035.
14. Torkzaban P., et al. “Low-level laser therapy with 940 nm diode laser on stability of dental implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial”. Lasers in Medical Science 2 (2018): 287-293.

Citation

Citation: Aliaa El-hossiny Ebrahim., et al. “Radiographic Evaluation of The Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Osseointegration of Immediate Dental Implants in the Mandible".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 7.12 (2023): 13-19.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Aliaa El-hossiny Ebrahim., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.