Vidya Dodwad¹ and Anindita Kundoo²*

¹Department of Periodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India
²Post graduate student Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital Pune, India

*Corresponding Author: Anindita Kundoo, Post graduate student Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital Pune, India.

Received: June 21, 2023; Published: July 29, 2023

Abstract

To restore function and aesthetics, dental therapy tries to replace all or part of the diseased or damaged tooth structure. For this reason, a variety of techniques have been used throughout the years, and implants have recently gained popularity. Osteointegration, which occurs when the implant and surrounding bone come into direct touch, is thought to be the most important factor in determining the clinical effectiveness of dental implants.

Implants with a narrower pitch are advantageous when primary stability is a concern because they increase bone-implant contact. The ideal values of thread depth and breadth may vary based on thread form and other geometric parameters. Thread depth is more important than thread width for dispersing peak stresses inside the bone. For implants put in the cancellous bone and subjected to rapid loading, the micro thread arrangement at the implant neck may enhance bone growth and stress distribution.

The advantages of a single design element for a particular implant may be increased or diminished by the implant's other factors. such as mechanical characteristics and biological circumstances. Clinicians should take into account the fact that an implant's success and survival are not guaranteed by a single design element.

Keywords: Implant; Thread Design; Tissues

References

1. Tatum OH. “The Omni implant system, Birmingham, Ala, Alabama Implant Congress (1988).
2. Rosa MB., et al. “The influence of surface treatment on the implant roughness pattern”. Journal of Applied Oral Science (2012): 550-555.
3. Han HS. “Design of new root-form endosseous dental implant and evaluation of fatigue strength using finite element analysis [master's thesis]. Iowa: The University of Iowa (2009).
4. BOBBIO A. “The first endoosseous alloplastic implants in the history of man”. Bulletin of the History of Dentistry 6 (1972): 20.
5. FORMIGGINI MS. “Protesi dentaria a mezzo di infibulazione diretta endoalveolare”. Riv Ital Stomatol (1947): 193.
6. Brånemark PI., et al. “Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw: experience from a 10-year period”. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 16 (1977): 1-132.
7. Keith J Ferro., et al. “The glossary of prosthodontic terms”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 94 (2005): 10-92.
8. Strong JT., et al. “Functional surface area: thread form parameter optimization for implant body design”. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 19 (1998): 49.
9. Abuhussein H., et al. “The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration”. Clinical Oral Implants Research 21 (2010): 129-136.
10. Yadav P., et al. “Implant design and stress distribution”. International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research 2 (2016): 34-39.
11. Misch CE., et al. “Scientific rationale for dental implant design. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary Implant Dentisry”. 3^rd St. Louis; Mosby (2008): 200-229.
12. Marković A., et al. “Implant stability in posterior maxilla: Bone- condensing versus bonedrilling: A clinical study”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 112 (2011): 557-563.
13. (Buser et al., 2012; Gotfredsen, 2012; Ostman, Hellman, and Sennerby, 2012).
14. Misch CE. “Dental implant prosthetics, Chapter. 22. Mosby, St. Louis (2003): 368-410.
15. Patric P and Ericsson I. “Esthetic implant dentistry-soft and hard tissue management, 1^st edition”. Quintessence Publishing, IL (2001).
16. , et al. “The effect of inter-implant distance on height of bone crest”. Journal of Periodontology 71 (2000): 546-549.
17. Hansson S and Werke M. “The Implant Thread as a Retention Element in Cortical Bone: The Effect of Thread Size and Thread Profile: A Finite Element Study”. Journal of Biomechanics 36 (2013): 1247-1258.
18. Oh TJ., et al. “The causes of early implant bone loss: Myth or science?” Journal of Periodontology 73 (2002): 322-333.
19. Kronström M., et al. “Early implant failures in patients treated with Brånemark System titanium dental implants: A retrospective study”. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 16 (2001): 201-207.
20. Petechia L., et al. “Biophysical characterization of nanostructured TiO2 as a good substrate for hBM-MSC adhesion, growth and differentiation”. Experimental Cell Research 358 (2017): 111-119.
21. Strong J., et al. “Functional surface area: Thread form parameter optimization for implant body design”. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 19 (1998): 4-9.
22. Albrektsson T., et al. “The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success”. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 1 (1986): 11-25.
23. Engquist B., et al. “Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Branemark System implants”. Clinical Oral Implants Research 13 (2002): 30-37.

Citation

Citation: Vidya Dodwad. “Effects of Implant Thread Design Around Tissues of Implant". Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 7.8 (2023): 92-100.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Vidya Dodwad. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.