Nidhi Saripalli*, Yogesh Khadtare and Aishwarya Sabharwal

Department of Periodontology, MDS Part III, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India

*Corresponding Author: Nidhi Saripalli, Department of Periodontology, MDS Part III, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.

Received: July 01, 2023; Published: July 17, 2023

Abstract

Dental implants have gained popularity over the last decade, as the most accepted treatment for the replacement of missing teeth, in almost all age groups. Conventional implantology has been practiced by clinicians with a high success rate, provided other clinical parameters are maintained at a certain level. However, conventional, or static guided approaches is by large an arbitrary approach that comes with its own drawbacks. These techniques depend heavily on the clinician’s experience. Hence, the development of the dynamic navigation systems for placing dental implants is becoming increasingly popular. These systems have an advantage of a real-time three-dimensional view of the placement and accuracy in the post-treatment outcomes as well.

Keywords:Dental Implants; Dynamic Navigation; Static Guided Approach; Conventional Approach; 3d Implantology

References

1. Block MS. “Dental Implants: The Last 100 Years”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1 (2018): 11-26.
2. Buser D., et al. “Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions”. Periodontology 20001 (2017): 7-21.
3. Nevins M. “Implant dentistry: a continuing evolution”. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 3 (2014): s7.
4. Mezger U., et al. “Navigation in surgery”. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 398 (2013): 501-514.
5. Clarke JV., et al. “Measuring the positional accuracy of computer assisted surgical tracking systems”. Computer-Assisted Surgery 1-3 (2010): 13-18.
6. Gerbino G., et al. “Management of needle breakage using intraoperative navigation following inferior alveolar nerve block”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 71 (2013): 1819.
7. Bobek SL. “Applications of navigation for orthognathic surgery”. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 26 (2014): 587.
8. O'Mahony A and Spencer P. “Osseointegrated implant failures”. Journal of the Irish Dental Association 2 (1999): 44-51.
9. Esposito M., et al. “Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis”. European Journal of Oral Sciences 3 (1998): 721-764.
10. Battista E., et al. “Dynamic Navigation System for Immediate Implant Placement in the Maxillary Aesthetic Region”. Applied Sciences11 (2022): 5510.
11. Panchal N., et al. “Dynamic navigation for dental implant surgery”. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics4 (2019): 539-547.
12. Ryakhovsky Alexander and Ryakhovsky SA. “A New Concept of 4D Virtual Planning in Dentistry”. Advances in Dentistry and Oral Health 3 (2020): 555832.

Citation

Citation: Nidhi Saripalli., et al. “Dynamic Navigation in Oral Implantology-A Review".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 7.8 (2023): 29-33.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Nidhi Saripalli., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.