Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ASDS)(ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 5

Effect of Acid Etching on Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive in Class V Non-Carious Lesions

Ali I Abdalla1*, Emna Hidoussi Sakly2 and Mohammad Aly Ibrahim3

1Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt and Visiting Professor at Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India
2PAssociate professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics , Dental Clinic of Monastir , Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir,Tunisia
3PTeaching Assistant, Faculty of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Al Salam University, Tanta, Egypt

*Corresponding Author: Ali I Abdalla, Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt and Visiting Professor at Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India

Received: March 08, 2023; Published: April 04, 2023

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of a universal adhesive Futurabond U in Class V abrasion lesions with and without acid etching procedures.

Materials and Methods: A total of 183 Class V non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) with incisal or occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin/cementum were selected and restored with Futurabond U adhesive and thermo-viscous bulk fill composite (Viscalor bulk fill composite). Restorations were made using three different techniques: after etching of the enamel, after etching the whole cavity for 20 seconds and without acid etching (control). The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 1- and 2-year using USPHS criteria.

Results: No loss of restorations was recorded after one and two years for all the three restorative techniques. There was no significant difference between the baseline and 2-years results for any of the tested technique. However, restorations made after acid etching showed less marginal discoloration at the enamel margins.

Conclusion: Futurabond U adhesive was effective in restoring Class V non-carious cavities after 2 years. Acid etching of the enamel margin or the whole cavity did not improve the clinical performance but showed improvement in Cavosurface marginal discoloration.

Keywords: Universal Adhesives; Clinical; Class V Non-Carious

References

  1. Browning WD., et al. “Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious Class V lesions”. Operative Dentistry 25 (2000): 46-50.
  2. Van Dijken JW. “Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions”. Dental Materials 16 (2000): 285-291.
  3. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges”. Operative Dentistry 28 (2003): 215-235.
  4. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “The clinical performance of adhesives”. Dental Material 26 (1998): 1-20.
  5. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions”. Quintessence International 27 (1996): 775-784.
  6. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems”. Journal of Dental Research 73 (1994): 1690-1702.
  7. Brackett WW., et al. “One-year clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods”. Operative Dentistry 27 (2002): 218-222.
  8. Swift EJ. “Dentin/enamel adhesives: review of the literature”. Pediatric Dentistry 24 (2002): 456-461.
  9. Turkun SL. “Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years”. Dental Materials 31 (2003): 527-534.
  10. Tay FR., et al. “The overwet phenomenon: a transmission electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface”. American Journal of Dentistry 9 (1996): 161-166.
  11. De Munck J., et al. “Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin”. Journal of Dental Research 82 (2003): 136-140.
  12. Tay FR and Pashley DH. “Dental adhesives of the future”. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 4 (2002): 91-103.
  13. Perdigão J. “Dentin bonding as a function of dentin structure”. Dental Clinics of North America 46 (2002): 277-301
  14. Hara AT., et al. “Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel”. American Journal of Dentistry 12 (1999): 181-184.
  15. Kanemura N., et al. “Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces”. Dental Material 27 (1999): 523-530.
  16. Tay FR., et al. “Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes”. Dental Materials 30 (2002): 371-382.
  17. Torii Y., et al. “Effect of self-etching primer containing N-acryloyl aspartic acid on enamel adhesion”. Dental Materials 19 (2003): 253-258.
  18. Hannig M., et al. “Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding”. Operative Dentistry 24 (1999): 172-180.
  19. Ibarra G., et al. “Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel”. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 4 (2002): 115-124.
  20. Pashley DH and Tay FR. “Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel”. Dental Materials 17 (2001): 430-344.
  21. Inoue H., et al. “Microtensile bond strength of two single-step adhesive systems to bur-prepared dentin”. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3 (2001): 129-136.
  22. Oliveira SS., et al. “The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system”. Dental Materials 19 (2003): 758-767.
  23. Tay FR and Pashley DH. “Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smears layers”. Dental Materials 17 (2001): 296-308.
  24. Tay FR., et al. “How can nanoleakage occur in self-etching adhesive systems that demineralize and infiltrate simultaneously?” The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 4 (2002): 255-269.
  25. Peumans M., et al. “Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions”. European Journal of Oral Sciences 113 (2005): 512-518.
  26. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel”. Dental Materials 21 (2005): 375-383.
  27. Cvar JF and Ryge G. “Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971”. Clinical Oral Investigations 9 (2005): 215-232.
  28. Van Landuyt KL., et al. “Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive”. Dental Materials 22 (2006): 533-544.
  29. Abdalla AI and Garcia-Godoy F. “Effect of hydrostatic pulpal water pressure on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin”. American Journal of Dentistry 21 (2008): 233-238.
  30. Albaladejo A., et al. “Hybrid layers of etch-and-rinse versus self-etching adhesive systems”. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal 15 (2010): 112-118.
  31. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “Correlative morphologic and clinical characterization of tooth biomaterial interaction In: Self-etching primer: current status and its evolution”. Proceedings of the international symposium ‘01, Tokyo (2001): 41-55.
  32. Yoshida Y., et al. “Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers”. Journal of Dental Research 83 (2004): 454-458.
  33. Misra DN. “Adsorption from solutions on synthetic hydroxyapatite: nonaqueous vs. aqueous solvents”. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 48 (1999): 848-855.
  34. Van Landuyt KL., et al. “Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive”. Dental Materials 22 (2006): 533-544.
  35. Frankenberger R and Tay FR. “Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations”. Dental Materials 21 (2005): 397-412.
  36. Blunck U and Roulet JF. “Effect of one year water storage on the effectiveness of dentin adhesive in class V composite resin restorations”. Journal of Dental Research 81 (2002): A-39.
  37. Van Landuyt KL., et al. “Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching”. Dental Materials 34 (2006): 77-85.
  38. Moll K., et al. “Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin bond strength of self-etching bonding systems”. American Journal of Dentistry 18 (2005): 335-339.

Citation

Citation: Ali I Abdalla., et al. “Effect of Acid Etching on Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive in Class V Non-Carious Lesions".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 7.5 (2023): 03-08.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Ali I Abdalla., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.278

Indexed In





News and Events


Contact US