Ali I Abdalla¹*, Emna Hidoussi Sakly² and Mohammad Aly Ibrahim³

¹Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt and Visiting Professor at Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India
²PAssociate professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics , Dental Clinic of Monastir , Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir,Tunisia
³PTeaching Assistant, Faculty of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Al Salam University, Tanta, Egypt

*Corresponding Author: Ali I Abdalla, Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt and Visiting Professor at Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India

Received: March 08, 2023; Published: April 04, 2023

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of a universal adhesive Futurabond U in Class V abrasion lesions with and without acid etching procedures.

Materials and Methods: A total of 183 Class V non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) with incisal or occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin/cementum were selected and restored with Futurabond U adhesive and thermo-viscous bulk fill composite (Viscalor bulk fill composite). Restorations were made using three different techniques: after etching of the enamel, after etching the whole cavity for 20 seconds and without acid etching (control). The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 1- and 2-year using USPHS criteria.

Results: No loss of restorations was recorded after one and two years for all the three restorative techniques. There was no significant difference between the baseline and 2-years results for any of the tested technique. However, restorations made after acid etching showed less marginal discoloration at the enamel margins.

Conclusion: Futurabond U adhesive was effective in restoring Class V non-carious cavities after 2 years. Acid etching of the enamel margin or the whole cavity did not improve the clinical performance but showed improvement in Cavosurface marginal discoloration.

Keywords: Universal Adhesives; Clinical; Class V Non-Carious

References

1. Browning WD., et al. “Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious Class V lesions”. Operative Dentistry 25 (2000): 46-50.
2. Van Dijken JW. “Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions”. Dental Materials 16 (2000): 285-291.
3. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges”. Operative Dentistry 28 (2003): 215-235.
4. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “The clinical performance of adhesives”. Dental Material 26 (1998): 1-20.
5. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions”. Quintessence International 27 (1996): 775-784.
6. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems”. Journal of Dental Research 73 (1994): 1690-1702.
7. Brackett WW., et al. “One-year clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods”. Operative Dentistry 27 (2002): 218-222.
8. Swift EJ. “Dentin/enamel adhesives: review of the literature”. Pediatric Dentistry 24 (2002): 456-461.
9. Turkun SL. “Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years”. Dental Materials 31 (2003): 527-534.
10. Tay FR., et al. “The overwet phenomenon: a transmission electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface”. American Journal of Dentistry 9 (1996): 161-166.
11. De Munck J., et al. “Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin”. Journal of Dental Research 82 (2003): 136-140.
12. Tay FR and Pashley DH. “Dental adhesives of the future”. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 4 (2002): 91-103.
13. Perdigão J. “Dentin bonding as a function of dentin structure”. Dental Clinics of North America 46 (2002): 277-301
14. Hara AT., et al. “Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel”. American Journal of Dentistry 12 (1999): 181-184.
15. Kanemura N., et al. “Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces”. Dental Material 27 (1999): 523-530.
16. Tay FR., et al. “Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes”. Dental Materials 30 (2002): 371-382.
17. Torii Y., et al. “Effect of self-etching primer containing N-acryloyl aspartic acid on enamel adhesion”. Dental Materials 19 (2003): 253-258.
18. Hannig M., et al. “Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding”. Operative Dentistry 24 (1999): 172-180.
19. Ibarra G., et al. “Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel”. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 4 (2002): 115-124.
20. Pashley DH and Tay FR. “Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel”. Dental Materials 17 (2001): 430-344.
21. Inoue H., et al. “Microtensile bond strength of two single-step adhesive systems to bur-prepared dentin”. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3 (2001): 129-136.
22. Oliveira SS., et al. “The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system”. Dental Materials 19 (2003): 758-767.
23. Tay FR and Pashley DH. “Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smears layers”. Dental Materials 17 (2001): 296-308.
24. Tay FR., et al. “How can nanoleakage occur in self-etching adhesive systems that demineralize and infiltrate simultaneously?” The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 4 (2002): 255-269.
25. Peumans M., et al. “Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions”. European Journal of Oral Sciences 113 (2005): 512-518.
26. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel”. Dental Materials 21 (2005): 375-383.
27. Cvar JF and Ryge G. “Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971”. Clinical Oral Investigations 9 (2005): 215-232.
28. Van Landuyt KL., et al. “Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive”. Dental Materials 22 (2006): 533-544.
29. Abdalla AI and Garcia-Godoy F. “Effect of hydrostatic pulpal water pressure on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin”. American Journal of Dentistry 21 (2008): 233-238.
30. Albaladejo A., et al. “Hybrid layers of etch-and-rinse versus self-etching adhesive systems”. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal 15 (2010): 112-118.
31. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “Correlative morphologic and clinical characterization of tooth biomaterial interaction In: Self-etching primer: current status and its evolution”. Proceedings of the international symposium ‘01, Tokyo (2001): 41-55.
32. Yoshida Y., et al. “Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers”. Journal of Dental Research 83 (2004): 454-458.
33. Misra DN. “Adsorption from solutions on synthetic hydroxyapatite: nonaqueous vs. aqueous solvents”. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 48 (1999): 848-855.
34. Van Landuyt KL., et al. “Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive”. Dental Materials 22 (2006): 533-544.
35. Frankenberger R and Tay FR. “Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations”. Dental Materials 21 (2005): 397-412.
36. Blunck U and Roulet JF. “Effect of one year water storage on the effectiveness of dentin adhesive in class V composite resin restorations”. Journal of Dental Research 81 (2002): A-39.
37. Van Landuyt KL., et al. “Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching”. Dental Materials 34 (2006): 77-85.
38. Moll K., et al. “Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin bond strength of self-etching bonding systems”. American Journal of Dentistry 18 (2005): 335-339.

Citation

Citation: Ali I Abdalla., et al. “Effect of Acid Etching on Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive in Class V Non-Carious Lesions".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 7.5 (2023): 03-08.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Ali I Abdalla., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.