Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ASDS)(ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 2

Effect of Biomimetic Remineralization of Post Space Root Dentin on Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber Post Bonded with Self-Adhesive Resin Cement - An Invitro Study

Sona Satleghi1, Zahra Yadegari2, Azieh Shahbazi2, Hassan Ali Shafiee3

1Under Graduate Student, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Departments of Dental Biomaterials, Dental school, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Professor of Orthodontics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

*Corresponding Author: Hassan Ali Shafiee, Professor of Orthodontics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Received: December 28, 2022; Published: January 11, 2023

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of Mass and non-fluoridated Oral B mouthwashes against Streptococcus salivarius (S. salivarius), Streptococcus sobrinus (S. sobrinus), and Streptococcus sanguinis (S. sanguinis).

Methodology: In this in vitro, experimental study, S. salivarius, S. sobrinus, and S. sanguinis were separately cultured on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar. The antimicrobial activity of Mass and Oral B Pro-Expert mouthwashes against the abovementioned microorganisms was evaluated by the agar well-diffusion test; 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) served as the positive control, and saline was used as the negative control. The diameter of the growth inhibition zones was measured. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each mouthwash against each microorganism was determined by the micro broth dilution technique. The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the mouthwashes was also determined.

Results: The MIC of both mouthwashes was the same (2048/1) for S. sobrinus. The MIC of Mass for S. sanguinis (2048/1) and S. salivarius (1/512) was lower than that of Oral B (1/1024 and 1/256, respectively). The MBC of both mouthwashes was the same for all three microorganisms (1/256 for S. sobrinus, 1/1024 for S. sanguinis, and 1/256 for S. salivarius).

Conclusion: The antimicrobial efficacy of Mass was similar to that of Oral B Pro-Expert against S. salivarius, S. sobrinus, and S. sanguinis.

Keywords:Streptococcus salivarius; Streptococcus sobrinus; Mouthwashes

References

  1. Kilian M., et al. “The oral microbiome-an update for oral healthcare professionals”. British Dental Journal10 (2016): 657-666.
  2. Verma D., et al. “Insights into the human oral microbiome”. Archives of Microbiology4 (2018): 525-540.
  3. Twetman S. “Prevention of dental caries as a non‐communicable disease”. European Journal of Oral Sciences 126 (2018): 19-25.
  4. Veiga NJ., et al. “Dental caries: A review”. Journal of Dental and Oral Health5 (2016): 1-3.
  5. Selwitz RH., et al. “Dental caries”. Lancet (London, England)9555 (2007): 51-59.
  6. Walsh LJ and Healey DL. “Prevention and caries risk management in teenage and orthodontic patients”. Australian Dental Journal 64 (2019): S37-45.
  7. Leeper DK., et al. “Risk assessments in orthodontic patients developing white spot lesions”. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry 4 (2019): e12470.
  8. Doğramacı EJ and Brennan DS. “The influence of orthodontic treatment on dental caries: an Australian cohort study”. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology3 (2019): 210-216.
  9. Ahn SJ., et al. “Quantitative analysis of the adhesion of cariogenic streptococci to orthodontic metal brackets”. The Angle Orthodontist4 (2005): 666-671.
  10. Al-Shahrani MA. “Microbiology of dental caries: A literature review”. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research4 (2019): 655-659.
  11. Tanzer JM., et al. “The microbiology of primary dental caries in humans”. Journal of Dental Education10 (2001): 1028-1037.
  12. Ciancio S. “Improving oral health: current considerations”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 30 (2003): 4-6.
  13. Weinstein MP., et al. “M100 performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing 28th edition”. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute3 (2018): 1-258.
  14. Ruiz Núñez MD., et al. “Dental plaque control strategies for the elderly population: A scoping review”. International Journal of Dental Hygiene1 (2022): 167-81.
  15. Salehi P., et al. “Comparison of the antibacterial effects of persica and matrica, two herbal mouthwashes with chlohexidine mouthwash”. Journal of Dentistry1,2 (2005): 63-72.
  16. Arweiler NB., et al. “Alcohol‐free mouthrinse solutions to reduce supragingival plaque regrowth and vitality: A controlled clinical study”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2 (2001): 168-174.
  17. Almas K., et al. “An in vitro antimicrobial comparison of miswak extract with commercially available non‐alcohol mouthrinses”. International Journal of Dental Hygiene1 (2005): 18-24.
  18. Hashemipour MA., et al. “Comparison of antimicrobial and cytotoxicity of Irsha, Oral B, Biothene, Povidone Iodine, Benzidamine and Camomile mouthwashes with control groups in vitro”. Journal of Dentistry 13 (2012): 456-464.
  19. Ghapanchi J., et al. “The antibacterial effect of four mouthwashes against streptococcus mutans and escherichia coli”. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association4 (2015): 350-353.
  20. Biria M., et al. “Antimicrobial Effects of Mass and Oral-B Mouthwashes on Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans: An In Vitro Study”. Journal of Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences4 (2020): 139-143.

Citation

Citation: Hassan Ali Shafiee., et al. “In vitro Comparative Antimicrobial Efficacy of Mass and Oral B Mouth Washes against Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus sobrinus, and Streptococcus sanguinis". Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 7.2 (2023): 113-118.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Hassan Ali Shafiee., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.278

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is June 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US