Shuchi Shrivastava*, Payal Sharma, Achint Juneja and Priyanka Choudhary

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, ITS Dental College, Ghaziabad (UP), India

*Corresponding Author: Shuchi Shrivastava, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, ITS Dental College, Ghaziabad (UP), India.

Received: December 19, 2022; Published: January 08, 2023

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare adhesive remnant removal post debonding of brackets bonded using two different Orthodontic adhesive and enamel color change after removal of adhesive remnant post debonding with a tungsten carbide bur with naked eye and under loupe magnification (3.5 X -420).

Method: Forty extracted premolars were divided into 2 groups according to the adhesive used for the bonding (Group I Enlight and Group II Grengloo adhesive). Both the groups further divided into two subgroups by two different debonding techniques (necked eye and loupe magnification (3.5 X -420). Enamel color was evaluated spectrophotometrically before bonding (T1) and after debonding and polishing (T2). The color parameters were measured for both the adhesive and adhesive removal techniques, and the corresponding color differences (ΔE) between the interval groups were calculated. Results obtained were subjected to Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann Whitney U test to compare color change statistically.

Results: Study revealed that the Grengloo groups showed significantly greater change in ΔL (4.31 ± 1.32 in 2A and 2.85 ± 1.92 in 2B) than the Enlight group. Δa and Δb did not show a significant difference in both the groups. Highest ΔE value was observed in Grengloo adhesive.

Conclusion: Both the adhesive removed with loupe magnification showed less enamel color change than adhesive removed with naked eye. Grengloo, the color changing adhesive showed greater color change after adhesive remnant removal than the conventional adhesive.

Keywords:Enamel Color; Grengloo Adhesive; Loupe Magnification

References

1. Boncuk Y., et al. “Effects of different orthodontic adhesives and resin removal techniques on enamel color alteration”. The Angle Orthodontist 4 (2014): 634-641.
2. Zaher AR., et al. “Enamel colour changes after debonding using various bonding systems”. Journal of Orthodontics 2 (2015): 82-88.
3. Ajami S., et al. “Impact of nanohydroxyapatite on enamel surface roughness and color change after orthodontic debonding”. Progress in Orthodontics 1 (2016).
4. Eliades T., et al. “Enamel surface roughnessfollowing debonding using two resin grinding methods”. European Journal of Orthodontics 3 (2004): 333-338.
5. Ribeiro AA., et al. “Assessing adhesive remnant removal and enamel damage with ultraviolet light: An in-vitro study”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2 (2017): 292-296.
6. Mohebi S., et al. “Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 3 (2017): 521-527.
7. D’Amario M., et al. “Debonding and clean-up in orthodontics: Evaluation of different techniques and micro-morphological aspects of the enamel surface”. Dentistry Journal 2 (2020).
8. Gorucu-Coskuner H., et al. “Tooth color change due to different etching and debonding procedures”. The Angle Orthodontist 6 (2018): 779-784.
9. Ameli N., et al. “Effect of two polishing systems on color and surface roughness of feldspathic porcelain following orthodontic bracket debonding and composite resin removal”. APOS Trends in Orthodontics 2 (2019): 105-110.
10. Chu SJ., et al. “Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects”. Journal of Dentistry 2 (2010): e2-16.
11. Beltrami R., et al. “Effect of different surface finishing/polishing procedures on color stability of esthetic restorative materials: A spectrophotometric evaluation”. European Journal of Dentistry 12 (2018): 49-56.
12. Chen Q., et al. “Influence of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances on enamel color: A systematic review”. BMC Oral Health 1 (2015): 1-8.
13. Trakyali G., et al. “Enamel colour changes at debonding and after finishing procedures using five different adhesives”. European Journal of Orthodontics 4 (2009): 397-401.
14. Joo HJ., et al. “Influence of orthodontic adhesives and clean-up procedures on the stain susceptibility of enamel after debonding”. The Angle Orthodontist 2 (2011): 334-340.
15. Baumann DF., et al. “Einfluss von Lupenbrillen auf die Qualitat der Adhasiv- Restentfernung bei orthodontischem Debonding”. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 2 (2011): 125-132.

Citation

Citation: Shuchi Shrivastava., et al. “Effects of Different Orthodontic Adhesives and Adhesive Remnant Removal Technique on Enamel Color Change-An In Vitro Study".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 7.2 (2023): 134-139.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Shuchi Shrivastava., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.