Renad Mazin Al-Shawwa¹*, Heba El Asfouri² and Khaled Ezzat³

¹Master Degree in Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
²Associate Professor of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
³Professor of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt

*Corresponding Author: Renad Mazin Al-Shawwa, Master’s degree in Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt.

Received: December 09, 2022; Published: January 06, 2023

Abstract

Aim: The study attempted to evaluate the shaping ability of One Curve single file in comparison to ProTaper Next multiple-file NiTi in terms of transportation and centering ability in curved mesiobuccal canals of human extracted mandibular molars using CBCT scanning.

Materials and Methods: Mesiobuccal canals of thirty extracted mandibular first and second molars with the angle of curvature ranging 20-45 ͦ (according to Schneider) were randomly allocated into two equal groups; One Curve (OC) and ProTaper Next (PTN) groups. Pre- and post-instrumentation CBCT imaging was performed to assess the centering ability and canal transportation of the tested instruments at 3, 5 and 8 mm from the apex.

Results: Regarding the results of canal transportation and centering ability, there was no statistically significant difference mesiodistally among the two groups at 3, 5, and 8mm (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The canal transportation values of the two tested rotary systems are considered acceptable. Both of One Curve and ProTaper Next systems were not able to achieve perfect centering ability during root canal preparation.

Keywords:Canal Transportation; Centering Ability; Cone Beam Computed Tomography; One Curve; Pro Taper Next

References

1. Hasheminia SM., et al. “Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Single-file Systems”. Journal of Endodontics12 (2018): 1788-1791.
2. Yamamura B., et al. “Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro-computed tomography”. Journal of Endodontics8 (2012): 1121-1125.
3. Saber SEDM and El Sadat SMA. “Effect of altering the reciprocation range on the fatigue life and the shaping ability of waveone nickel-titanium instruments”. Journal of Endodontics5 (2013): 685-688.
4. Marzouk AM and Ghoneim AG. “Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems”. Journal of Endodontics7 (2013): 906-909.
5. Szep S., et al. “Preparation of severely curved simulated root canals using engine-driven rotary and conventional hand instruments”. Clinical Oral Investigations1 (2001): 17-25.
6. Saleh AM., et al. “Shaping ability of 4 different single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals”. Journal of Endodontics4 (2015): 548-552.
7. Yared G. “Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: Preliminary observations”. International Endodontic Journal4 (2008): 339-344.
8. Micro-Mega. “The One Curve brochure”. NEW (2017).
9. Dent-Sply. ProTaper Next^® Flexible performance (2013).
10. Deepak J., et al. “Shaping Ability of 5 (th) Generation Ni-Ti Rotary Systems for Root Canal Preparation in Curved Root Canals using CBCT: An In Vitro Study”. Journal of International Oral Health 1 (2015): 57-61.
11. Gambill JM., et al. “Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless-steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography”. Journal of Endodontics7 (1996): 369-375.
12. Elnaghy AM and Elsaka SE. “Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of One Curve, 2Shape, ProFile Vortex, Vortex Blue, and RaCe Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Single and Double Curvature Canals”. Journal of Endodontics11 (2018): 1725-1730.
13. Yuan G and Yang G. “Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals”. Journal of Dental Sciences1 (2018): 37-42.
14. Ghobashy AM and Nagy MM OM. “Cleaning Ability of Single-File Preparation Technique in Curved Canals”. Endodontic (London England)2 (2016): 83-87.
15. Liu Y., et al. “Comparison of Shaping Ability of Five Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Simulated Curved Canals”. Journal of Dental and Oral Health117 (2017).
16. Venino PM., et al. “A Micro-computed Tomography Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Two Nickel-titanium Instruments, HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next”. Journal of Endodontics4 (2017): 628-632.
17. Bürklein S., et al. “Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals”. International Endodontic Journal 8 (2015): 774-781.
18. Silva EJNL., et al. “Comparison of canal transportation in simulated curved canals prepared with ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold systems”. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics1 (2016): 1.
19. Razcha C., et al. “Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of 4 Heat-Treated Nickel-Titanium Systems”. Journal of Endodontics5 (2020): 675-681.
20. Madureira RG., et al. “Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology2 (2010): e136-144.
21. Bürklein S., et al. “Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper”. International Endodontic Journal5 (2012): 449-461.
22. Berechet D., et al. “A micro-computed tomography study of morphological aspect of root canal instrumentation with protaper next and one shape new generation in mandibular molars”. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology2 (2018): 499-503.
23. Kyaw Moe MM., et al. “Root Canal Shaping Effect of Instruments with Offset Mass of Rotation in the Mandibular First Molar: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study”. Journal of Endodontics5 (2018): 822-827.
24. Iqbal MK., et al. “Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments”. International Endodontic Journal6 (2004): 359-364.
25. Nagy CD., et al. “The effect of root canal morphology on canal shape following instrumentation using different techniques”. International Endodontic Journal2 (1997): 133-140.
26. Pruett, John P., et al. “Cyclic Fatigue Testing of Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments”. Scientific Articles2 (1997): 77-85.
27. Hassan R., et al. “Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of Xp Shaper, WaveOne and Oneshape: a cone beam computed tomography study of curved root canals”. Acta odontológica Latinoamericana1 (2018): 67-74.
28. Bergmans L., et al. “Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments”. International Endodontic Journal4 (2003): 288-295.
29. Estrela C., et al. “Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite”. Brazilian Dental Journal2 (2002): 113-117.
30. Naenni N., et al. “Soft tissue dissolution capacity of currently used and potential endodontic irrigants”. Journal of Endodontics 11 (2004): 785-787.
31. Coldero LG., et al. “Reduction in intracanal bacteria during root canal preparation with and without apical enlargement”. International Endodontic Journal5 (2002): 437-446.
32. Van der Vyver PJ., et al. “Root Canal Shaping Using Nickel Titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: A Micro-computed Tomographic Comparative Study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold Instruments in Maxillary First Molars”. Journal of Endodontics 1 (2019): 62-67.
33. Gagliardi J., et al. “Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals”. Journal of Endodontics 10 (2015): 1718-1724.
34. Cotton TP., et al. “Endodontic Applications of Cone-Beam Volumetric Tomography”. Journal of Endodontics9 (2007): 1121-1132.
35. Gluskin AH., et al. “A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GTTM files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators”. International Endodontic Journal6 (2001): 476-484.
36. “Glossary of Endodontic Terms 2016”. Glossary of Endodontic Terms 9 (2015): 43.
37. López FU., et al. “Apical Transportation: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Root Canal Instrumentation Techniques with Three Different Apical Diameters”. Journal of Endodontics 12 (2008): 1545-1548.
38. García M., et al. “A comparison of apical transportation between profile and RaCe rotary instruments”. Journal of Endodontics7 (2012): 990-992.
39. Vallaeys K., et al. “Comparative analysis of canal transportation and centring ability of three Ni-Ti rotary endodontic systems: Protaper^®, MTwo^® and Revo-STM, assessed by micro-computed tomography”. Odontology1 (2016): 83-88.
40. Santhosh D., et al. “Comparative evaluation of efficiency of single-file rotary and reciprocating systems in instrumenting severely curved mesial root canals of extracted mandibular first molars: A morphometric study using cone-beam computed tomography”. Saudi Endodontic Journal2 (2019): 119-125.
41. Gergi R., et al. “Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Twisted Files, Pathfile-ProTaper System, and Stainless Steel Hand K-Files by Using Computed Tomography”. Journal of Endodontics5 (2010): 904-907.
42. Garcia Filho PF., et al. “Danger zone in mandibular molars before instrumentation: an in vitro study”. Journal of Applied Oral Science 11 (2003): 324-326.
43. Schäfer E and Schlingemann R. “Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth”. International Endodontic Journal3 (2003): 208-217.
44. Wu MK., et al. “Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: Effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings”. Journal of Endodontics4 (2000): 210-216.
45. Kolhe S., et al. “Microcomputed tomographic evaluation of shaping ability of two thermo mechanically treated single-file systems in severely curved roots”. Journal of Conservative Dentistry3 (2020): 244-248.
46. Staffoli S., et al. “Comparison of shaping ability of ProTaper Next and 2Shape nickel-titanium files in simulated severe curved canals”. Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia2 (2): 52-56.
47. Gomaa MA., et al. “Shaping ability of three thermally treated nickel-titanium systems in S-shaped canals”. Australian Endodontic Journal 9 (2021): 1-7.
48. Tufenkci P., et al. “Micro-computed tomographic assessment of the shaping ability of the One Curve, One Shape, and ProTaper Next nickel-titanium rotary systems”. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics3 (2020): 1-11.
49. Sinai IH. “Endodontic perforations: their prognosis and treatment”. Journal of the American Dental Association1 (1977): 90-95.

Citation

Citation: Renad Mazin Al-Shawwa.,et al. “Assessment of Shaping Ability of One Curve Single-File in Comparison to Multiple-Files Protaper Next Rotary System. (A Comparative in Vitro Study)".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 7.2 (2023): 68-77.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Renad Mazin Al-Shawwa.,et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.