Periodontal Status and Treatment Needs of Mentally Challenges Individuals Attending
Special School in Nashik District, Maharashtra, India
Deepashri H Kambalimath1*, Halaswamy V Kambalimath2,
Satyanarayan MVV3, Ashok Kumar V4, Ravi Kumar TG5 and Deepak RM6
1Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Aariake Superspeciallity Hospital,
Devangere, India
2Preventive and Pediatric Dentist, Aariake Superspeciallity Hospital, Devangere, India
3Consultant Neurosurgeon, Aariake Superspeciallity Hospital, Devangere, India
4Internal Medicine and Nephologist, Aariake Superspeciallity Hospital, Devangere,India
5General Surgeon, Aariake Superspeciallity Hospital, Devangere, India
6Anaesthetist, Aariake Superspeciallity Hospital, Devangere, India
*Corresponding Author: Deepashri H Kambalimath, Department of Oral
Maxillofacial Surgery, Aariake Superspeciallity Hospital, Devangere, India.
Received: September 14, 2022; Published: November 07, 2022
Abstract
Introduction: Zygomatic bone and its surrounding bony anatomy are essential for maintaining facial contour - cheek prominence and orbital integrity. Management of the zygomatic complex (ZMC) fractures are important in the maintenance of function and facial integrity.
Aim and objectives: To analyse the incidence, aetiology, surgical management and complications encountered in the treatment of ZMC fractures in our super-speciality hospital, and to compare the number and location of fixation points and surgical access in our patient cohort with the literature.
Materials and Method: Retrospective analysis of all operative cases (Open Reduction and Internal Fixation) of zygomatic complex fractures (ZMC)over a three-year period (2017-2021) were reviewed. Craniofacial maxillofacial trauma patient’s medical records were collected and out which only the zygomatic complex fractures cases were reviewed. Only the medical records from the period from 2017-2021 were included. The parameters like etiology, site of the ZMC fracture, type of fracture, associated injuries, clinical findings, treated with conservative or surgical intervention, type of incisions used, number of fixation used and any complications encountered were reviwed and analysed.
Results: TOut of 428 cases of craniofacial injury, 96 cases were ZMC fractures, Isolated ZMC fractures accounted for 43%, 33% with associated injuries, 13% isolated arch while 11% accounted isolated infraorbital rim fracture. Most common clinical findings were subconjunctival ecchymosis (71%), flattening of cheek (39%), malocclusion (22%) and so on.
Buccal sulcus incision (66%) was mainly used, followed by upper blepharoplasty incision (59%). Depending on degree of displacement of fracture one-point fixation (8%), two-point fixation (30%) or three-point fixation (27%) was performed. About 33% of cases were conservatively managed and followed up on regular intervals.
Lymph edema, infra orbital paresthesia, temporary blindness, diplopia, hemianopsia were some of the complications encountered which were managed successfully and followed up.
Conclusion: ZMC fractures are most commonly occurring midface fractures with variable etiologies. The most common ZMC fracture pattern was tripod type of fracture. Greater portion of the patient were treated with two-point fixation. Most of the complications were due to the impact and velocity of trauma.
Keywords:ZMC Fracture; Incidence; 2 Point Fixation; Complications
References
- Miloro M., et al. “Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Edition 2)”. Hamilton, BC Decker (2004): 447-451.
- Zingg M., et al. “Classification and treatment of zygomatic fractures: a review of 1,025 cases”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 50 (1992): 778e790.
- Peretti N and Macleod S. “Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 25 (2017): 314-319.
- Patil AJ., et al. “Incidence and Management of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures Treated at Mahatma Gandhi Mission Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra”. International Journal of Current Medical and Applied sciences2 (2019): 11-15.
- Shapiro AJ., et al. “Facial fractures in a level I trauma centre: the importance of protective devices and alcohol abuse”. Injury 32 (2001): 353-356.
- Panek U., et al. “Characteristics and Epidemiology of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures”. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 21 (2010): 1018-1023.
- Forouzanfar T., et al. “A 10-year analysis of the "Amsterdam" protocol in the treatment of zygomatic complex fractures”. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 41 (2013): 616-622.
- Ashwin DP., et al. “A study on assessing the aetiology and different treatment modalities of zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture”. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research6 (2017): 1423-1430.
- Edward I Lee., et al. “Optimizing the Surgical Management of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures”. Seminars in Plastic Surgery 24 (2010): 389-397.
- Bradley D., et al. “Surgical management of zygomatic complex fractures in a major trauma centre”. Plastic and Aesthetic Research 6 (2019): 11.
- Uda H., et al. “The concept and method of closed reduction and internal fixation: a new approach for the treatment of simple zygoma fractures”. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 132 (2013): 1231-1240.
- Pozatek ZW., et al. “Fractures of the zygomatic complex: an evalution of surgical management with special emphasis on the eyebrow approach”. Journal of Oral Surgery 31 (1973): 141-148.
- Baylan JM., et al. “Management of zygomatic fractures: a national survey”. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 27 (2016): 1571-1575.
- Momeni Roochi M Abbasi., et al. “The Incidence of Common Complications, Including Ectropion and Entropion, in Transconjunctival and Subciliary Approaches for Treatment of ZMC Fractures”. Journal of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2 (2021): 76-81.
- El-Anwar MW., et al. “Transconjunctival versus subciliary approach to the infraorbital margin for open reduction of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: A randomized feasibility study”. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 21 (2017): 187-192.
- Kim Ji Heui., et al. “The Effectiveness of 1-Point Fixation for Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures”. Archives of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 9 (2012): 828-832.
- Chakranarayan A., et al. “Efficacy of two-point rigid internal fixation in the management of zygomatic complex fracture”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 3 (2009): 265-269.
- Mittal G., et al. “Efficacy of two-point fixation in the management of zygomatic complex fractures - A prospective clinical study”. National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery 2 (2019): 223-227.
- Gadkari N., et al. “Comparative evaluation of 2-point vs 3-point fixation in the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: A systematic review”. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 47 (2019) 1542-1550.
- Widodo DW., et al. “Evaluation of 3 and 2-point internal fixation in the management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: Case report”. Annals of Medicine and Surgery 67 (2021): 1025390.
- Wail Fayez Nasr., et al. “Two- versus Three-Point Internal Fixation of Displaced Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures”. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma and Reconstruction 04 (2018): 256-264.
- Latif K., et al. “Post operative outcomes in open reduction and internal fixation of zygomatic bone fractures”. Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal 37 (2017): 523e530.
- A Karimi and E Shoohanizad. “The management of zygomatic complex fractures: a review”. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International 4 (2019): 1-6.
- Crosara JM., et al. “Comparison of cutaneous incisions to approach the infraorbital rim and orbital floor”. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences 2 (2009): 88-91.
Citation
Copyright