Bahaddin I Emhmed¹, Hosam E Elarabi², Fatma K Ahmad¹ and Abdulsalam EE Ibrahim³*

¹Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gharyan University, Libya
²Department of conservative, Faculty of Dentistry, Gharyan University, Libya
³Department of surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Sebha University, Libya

*Corresponding Author: Abdulsalam EE Ibrahim, Department of surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Sebha University, Libya.

Received: February 08, 2022; Published: April 26, 2022

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to\assess the effect of full contour zirconia and PMF on the retention of Acetal Resin Maxillary class I Kennedy classification is composed of two typical educational acrylic resin models, with residual teeth stretching from the right first premolar to the left first premolar teeth. Porcelain fused to metal and full zirconia crowns, proximal guiding planes, and buccal undercuts of 0.50 mm were placed on both first premolar teeth of each cast. Based on the type of crown used, the casts were split into 2 groups. Each acrylic cast was reproduced to make refractory casts. The acetal resin samples were prepared according to the manufacturer's specifications. A wax pattern tegingue was utilized to fuse porcelain to metal, and a CADCAM machine was used to create a full zirconia crown. Buccal undercuts of approximately 0.50 mm and proximal guiding planes Based on the type of crown utilized, the casts were split into two groups. To manufacture refractory castes, each acrylic cast was replicated. The acetal resin samples were prepared according to the manufacturer's specifications. Each clasp and its model were tested using universal test equipment. The clasp's retention force was tested using a universal testing machine running at 5 mm/min and recorded by computer software. With an acetal resin clasp, both types of ceramic systems have retentive forces. The amount of retention was unaffected by any form of ceramic.

Keywords: Ceramic; Acetal Resin; Retention

References

1. Stapper CF., et al. “Marginal adaptation of three unit fixed partial denture constructed from pressed ceramic systems”. British Dental Journal 196 (2004): 766-770.
2. Christensen G. “Longevity versus esthetics”. Journal of the American Dental Association 1014 (2007): 1013-1015.
3. Hondrum SO. “A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 67 (1992): 859-862.
4. Sundh A and Sjogren G. “Fracture resistance of all-ceramic zirconia bridges with differing phase stabilizers and quality of sintering”. Dental Material 22 (2006): 778-784.
5. Quinn JB., et al. “Fractographic analysis and material properties of a dental zirconia”. Poster presented at: IADR/AADR/CADR 83rd General Session (2005).
6. Jones DW. “Development of dental ceramics. A historical perspective”. Dental Clinics of North America 29 (1985): 621-644.
7. Firtell DN. “Effect of clasp design upon retention of removable partial dentures”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 20 (1968): 43-52.
8. Bates JF. “Retention of cobalt-chromium partial dentures”. Dental Practice 14 (1963): 168-171.
9. La Vere AM. “Clasp retention: the effects of five variables”. Journal of Prosthodontics 2 (1993): 126-131.
10. Soo S and Leung T. “Hidden clasps versus C clasps and I bars: a comparison of retention”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 75 (1996): 622-625.
11. Dixon DL., et al. “Use of a partial-coverage porcelain laminate to enhance clasp retention”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 63 (1990): 55-58.
12. Dixon DL., et al. “Wear of I-bar clasps and porcelain laminate restorations”. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 5 (1992): 28-33.
13. Elledge DA., et al. “A provisional restoration technique for Laminate veneer preparations”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 62 (1989): 139-142.
14. Tietge JD., et al. “The effect of polishing porcelain laminates on induced I-Bar wear”. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 5 (1992): 523-526.
15. Teppo KW and Smith FW. “A technique for restoring abutments for removable partial dentures”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (1978): 401-421.
16. Lubovich RP and Peterson T. “The fabrication of a ceramic-metal crown to fit an existing removable partial denture clasp”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 37 (1977): 610-614.
17. Riagordski AJ. “Contemporary materials and technologies for all ceramic fixed partial dentures: A review of literature”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 92 (2004): 557-562.
18. Fitton JS., et al. “The physical properties of a polyacetal denture resin”. Clinical Materials 17 (1995): 125-129.
19. Kirsch A and Ackerman KL. “The IMZ osseointegrated implant system”. Dental Clinics of North America 33 (1989): 733-791.
20. Rodrigues RC., et al. “Comparative study of circumferential clasp retention force for titanium and cobalt- chromium removable partial dentures”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 88 (2002): 290-296.
21. Kawara M., et al. “Scratch test of thermoplastic denture base resins for non-metal clasp dentures”. Journal of Prosthodontics Research 58 (2014): 35-40.
22. . “Relationship between Educational Level and Incidence of Obesity among Adults in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria". Acta Scientific Medical Sciences8 (2020): 136-142.

Citation

Citation: Abdulsalam EE Ibrahim., et al. “Influence of Two Ceramic Systems on Acetal Resin Clasp Retention”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 6.5 (2022): 98-101.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Abdulsalam EE Ibrahim., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.