Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ASDS)(ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 4

Marginal Adaptation and Internal Fit of All Ceramic Crowns Fabricated with Pressed Versus Milled Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate (An In-vitro study)

Fahmi Y1*, Taymour M2 and El Naggar G3

1MSc Degree Student, Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
2Associate Professor, Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt and Associate Professor, Fixed Prosthodontics Division, School of Dentistry, Newgiza University, Giza, Egypt
3Professor, Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

*Corresponding Author: Fahmi Y, MSc Degree Student, Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Received: March 14, 2022; Published: March 21, 2022

Abstract

Aim: Evaluate the marginal adaptation and internal fit of Zirconia reinforced Lithium silicate crowns fabricated with heat pressed “Celtra Press” ingots compared to crowns fabricated with milled “Celtra Duo” blocks.

Methodology: Ten zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns were studied and divided into two groups according to fabrication method; heat pressed group and milled group. A stainless-steel die was prepared according to the all-ceramic tooth preparation criteria. The metal die was scanned by intraoral scanner (CEREC Omnicam). Group I (n = 5) was constructed by means of heat pressing of milled wax patterns into Celtra Press ingots. Group II (n = 5) was milled from Celtra DUO blocks. Each crown was placed on the metal die and the vertical marginal adaptation was measured by direct viewing method using a stereomicroscope. The internal fit of crowns was measured using silicone replica technique. Data were statistically analysed by 1-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey honestly significant difference test (P < 0.05).

Results: The mean values of vertical marginal gap were 24.69 ± 1.28 μm for the heat-pressed group and 24.23 ± 1.26 μm for the milled group, with statistically non-significant difference between both groups. The mean values of internal gap were 60.77 ± 6.3 μm for the heat-pressed group and 93.94 ± 1 μm for the milled group. There was statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of internal fit.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, it can be concluded that the manufacturing technique of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate has no effect on the vertical marginal adaptation of the crowns. Heat pressing of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns produced more favorable internal fit compared to milling technique. The marginal and internal gaps achieved by the crowns across all groups were within a clinically acceptable range.

Keywords: Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate; Milled; Heat Pressed; Marginal Adaptation; Internal Fit

References

  1. Abo El Fadl., et al. “Evaluation Of Marginal Gap Of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled From Two Ceramic Materials”. Egyptian Dental Journal64 (2018): 2531-2536.
  2. Elsaka Shaymaa E and Amr M Elnaghy. "Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic”. Dental Materials32 (2016): 908-914.
  3. Denry Isabelle and Julie A Holloway. "Ceramics for dental applications: a review”. Materials3 (2010): 351-368.
  4. Contrepois Mathieu., et al. “Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 110 (2013): 447-454.
  5. Colpani Juliana Tereza., et al. “Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings”. Dental Materials29 (2013): 174-180.
  6. Vojdani Mahroo., et al. “The effect of porcelain firing and type of finish line on the marginal fit of zirconia copings”. Journal of Dentistry16 (2015): 113.
  7. Son Keunbada., et al. “A comparison study of marginal and internal fit assessment methods for fixed dental prostheses”. Journal of Clinical Medicine8 (2019): 785.
  8. Martins Leandro Moura., et al. “Internal fit of two all-ceramic systems and metal-ceramic crowns”. Journal of Applied Oral Science20 (2012): 235-240.
  9. Vojdani MA., et al. “Comparison the marginal and internal fit of metal copings cast from wax patterns fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional wax up techniques”. Journal of Dentistry14 (2013): 118.
  10. Vasiliu Roxana-Diana., et al. “In Vitro study of comparative evaluation of marginal and internal fit between heat-pressed and CAD-CAM monolithic glass-ceramic restorations after thermal aging”. Materials13 (2020): 4239.
  11. Elrashid Afra Hassan., et al. “Stereomicroscopic evaluation of marginal fit of E. Max press and E. Max computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing lithium disilicate ceramic crowns: An in vitro study”. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry9 (2019): 178.
  12. Sadid-Zadeh Ramtin., et al. “Accuracy of marginal fit and axial wall contour for lithium disilicate crowns fabricated using three digital workflows”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry123 (2020): 121-127.
  13. Korsel Amany M. "Comparing of Marginal and internal fit of Monolithic Zircon crown Fabricated by 3D Printed Die versus Conventional”. Egyptian Dental Journal64 (2018): 811-820.
  14. Balkaya Mehmet Cudi., et al. “Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry93 (2005): 346-355.
  15. Vigolo Paolo and Fulvio Fonzi. "An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium‐oxide‐based ceramic four‐unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles”. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry17 (2008): 621-626.
  16. Al-Zubaidi ZAK and AMW Al-Shamma. "The effect of different finishing lines on the marginal fitness of full contour zirconia and glass ceramic CAD/CAM crowns (an in-vitro study)”. Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques4 (2015): 127-136.
  17. Jassim Zainab M and Manhal A Majeed. "Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Monolithic Crowns Fabricated from Different all-ceramic CAD/CAM Materials (an in vitro study)”. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal11 (2018): 1689-1697.
  18. Goodacre Charles J., et al. “Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry85 (2001): 363-376.
  19. Yekula Prem Sagar., et al. “A simple method of preparing tooth to receive a full crown”. Indian Journal of Dental Research 9 (2017): 363-376.
  20. Habib Syed Rashid., et al. “Effect of anatomic, semi-anatomic and non-anatomic occlusal surface tooth preparations on the adaptation of zirconia copings”. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics6 (2014): 444-450.
  21. Lima Fernanda Ferruzzi., et al. “Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry120 (2018): 396-402.
  22. Sason Gursharan Kaur., et al. “A comparative evaluation of intraoral and extraoral digital impressions: An in vivo study”. The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society18 (2018): 108.
  23. Mously Hisham A., et al. “Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry112 (2014): 249-256.
  24. Pilo R., et al. “Marginal fit and retention strength of zirconia crowns cemented by self-adhesive resin cements”. Operative Dentistry43 (2018): 151-161.
  25. Goujat Alexis., et al. “Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 121 (2019): 590-597.
  26. Shamseddine Loubna., et al. “Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry116 (2016): 242-248.
  27. Homsy Foudda R., et al. “Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry119 (2018): 783-790.
  28. Taha Doaa., et al. “Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging”. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry30 (2018): 319-328.
  29. Nawafleh Noor A., et al. “Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review”. Journal of Prosthodontics22 (2013): 419-428.
  30. Schönberger Joana., et al. “Evaluation of two protocols to measure the accuracy of fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study”. Journal of Prosthodontics28 (2019): e599-e603.
  31. Rahme Habib Y., et al. “In vitro evaluation of the “replica technique” in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns”. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 9 (2008): 25-32.
  32. Abdel-Azim Tamer., et al. “Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 114 (2015): 554-559.
  33. Alajaji Norah K., et al. “Micro‐CT Evaluation of Ceramic Inlays: Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Five and Three Axis CAM Systems with a Heat Press Technique”. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 29 (2017): 49-58.
  34. Dolev Eran., et al. “Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 121 (2019): 124-128.
  35. Kalla B., et al. “Marginal Adaptation of CAD-CAM Fabricated Ceramic Inlays : An in-Vitro Evaluation”. International Journal of Science and Research 9 (2020): 723-727
  36. Neves Flávio D., et al. “Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry112 (2014): 1134-1140.
  37. Azar Basel., et al. “The marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns: Press vs. CAD/CAM”. Brazilian Oral Research32 (2018): 1807-3107.
  38. Guess Petra C., et al. “Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue”. Journal of Dentistry42 (2014): 199-209.
  39. Beyari Mohammed M. "Marginal and internal crown fit evaluation of CAD”. CAM versus press-laboratory all-ceramic crown”. Clinical Medicine and Diagnostics 4 (2014): 21-26.
  40. Han Hyun-Sook., et al. “Marginal accuracy and internal fit of machine-milled and cast titanium crowns”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry106 (2011): 191-197.

Citation

Citation: Fahmi Y., et al. “Marginal Adaptation and Internal Fit of All Ceramic Crowns Fabricated with Pressed Versus Milled Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate (An In-vitro study)".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 6.3 (2022): 68-75.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Fahmi Y., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.278

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is October 10, 2022.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US