Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ASDS)(ISSN: 2581-4893)

Review Article Volume 6 Issue 3

Vaccine Hesitancy- A Review of Literature

Pratibha Sharma1, Chandrashekhar BR2* and Vivek Bhaskar3

1Post Graduate Student, Department of Public Health Dentistry, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Reseach, Mysuru, India
2Professor and Head of Department, Department of Public Health Dentistry, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Reseach, Mysuru, India
3Specialist Orthodontist, Private Practice, Muscat, Oman

*Corresponding Author: Chandrashekhar BR, Professor and Head of Department, Department of Public Health Dentistry, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Reseach, Mysuru, India.

Received: February 21, 2022; Published: March 10, 2022

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is the refusal by members of the public to take safe and recommended vaccines. This has been recorded since many decades. With each infection that modern medicine tries to eradicate via vaccines, there has been hesitancy from the public in different forms towards getting the said vaccines. However, successful strategies have been adopted to ensure maximum coverage of vaccination thereby facilitating elimination of the particular disease. Today, vaccine hesitancy stands in the way of successful resolution of the COVID- 19 pandemic. This article reviews the history of vaccine hesitancy, some important concepts about hesitancy and strategies that were carried out to overcome them. It is hoped that this article could help healthcare workers better understand vaccine hesitancy and use some of the methods mentioned here in achieving maximum rates of COVID 19 vaccinations.

Keywords: Vaccine hesitancy; Vaccines; COVID 19

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021).
  2. World Health Organization (2020).
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). “Ten great public health achievements--United States, 1900-1999”. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 48 (1999): 241-243.
  4. MacDonald NE. SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. “Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope and determinants”. Vaccine 34 (2016): 4161-4164.
  5. Dube E., et al. “Vaccine hesitancy: an overview”. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics8 (2013): 1763-1773.
  6. World Health Organization. “Report of the SAGE working group on Vaccine Hesitancy” (2014).
  7. Rathbone J. “Lady Mary Wortley Montague’s contribution to the eradication of smallpox”. Lancet 9014 (1996): 1566.
  8. Riedel S. “Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination”. Proceedings Baylor University Medical Center1 (2005): 21.
  9. Jason L. “ New Media, Old Messages: Themes in the History of Vaccine Hesitancy and Refusal”. American Medical Association Journal of Ethics 1 (2012): 50-55.
  10. Jackson CL. “State laws on compulsory immunization in the United States”. Public Health Reports9 (1969): 787-795.
  11. Mariner WK., et al. “Jacobson v Massachusetts: it’s not your great-great-grandfather’s public health law”. American Journal of Public Health 4 (2005): 581.
  12. Wakefield AJ., et al. “Ileallymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children”. Lancet 351 (1998): 637-641.
  13. Gross L. “A broken trust: lessons from the vaccine-autism wars”. PLoS Biology5 (2009): e1000114.
  14. Colgrove J. “State of Immunity: The Politics of Vaccination in Twentieth Century America”. Berkeley: University of California Press (2006).
  15. Betsch C., et al. “Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? How the Internet influences vaccination decisions: recent evidence and tentative guidelines for online vaccine communication”. Vaccine 30 (2012): 3723-3726.
  16. Brunson EK. “The impact of social networks on parents’ vaccination decisions”. Pediatrics 131 (2013): e1397-404.
  17. Wheeler M and Buttenheim AM. “Parental vaccine concerns, information source, and choice of alternative immunization schedules”. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics 9 (2013): 1782-1789.
  18. Marshall GS. “Vaccine hesitancy, history, and human nature: the 2018 Stanley A. Plotkin lecture”. Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society 8 (2018): 1-8.
  19. Kata A. “Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm-An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the antivaccination movement”. Vaccine 25 (2012): 3778-3789.
  20. Betsch C., et al. “The influence of vaccine-critical websites on perceiving vaccination risks”. Journal of Health Psychology 15 (2010): 446-455.
  21. Betsch C., et al. “Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions: a simulation of an online patient social network”. Medical Decision Making 33 (2013): 14-25.
  22. Haase N., et al. “Impact of disease risk on the narrative bias in vaccination risk perceptions”. Psychology and Health 35 (2020): 346-365.
  23. Nan X and Madden K. “HPV vaccine information in the blogosphere: how positive and negative blogs influence vaccine-related risk perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions”. Health Communication 27 (2012): 829-836.
  24. Dunn AG., et al. “Mapping information exposure on social media to explain differences in HPV vaccine coverage in the United States. Vaccine 35 (2017): 3033-3040.
  25. Conis E. “Vaccine Nation: America’s Changing Relationship with Immunization”. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press (2014).
  26. Holmberg C., et al. “The Politics of Vaccination: A Global History”. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press (2017).
  27. Jamison AM., et al. “You don’t trust a government vaccine”: narratives of institutional trust and influenza vaccination among African American and white adults”. Social Science and Medicine 221 (2019): 87-94.
  28. Sobo EJ., et al. “Information curation among vaccine cautious parents: Web 2.0, Pinterest thinking, and pediatric vaccination choice”. Medical Anthropology 35 (2016): 529-46.
  29. Thomson A., et al. “The 5As: a practical taxonomy for the determinants of vaccine uptake”. Vaccine 34 (2016): 1018-1024.
  30. Betsch C., et al. “Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination”. PLoS ONE 12 (2018): e0208601.
  31. Schwarzer R and Fuchs R. “Self-efficacy and health behaviours”. Predict Health Behaviour Research and Practice with Social Cognition Models (1996): 163-196.
  32. Johnson JG., et al. “DOSPERT-G Bereichsspezifische Risikoskala-Deutsche Version Domain-specific Risk-taking Scale-German version (2004).
  33. Kata A. “Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm-An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement”. Vaccine 30 (2012): 3778-3789.
  34. Andersson N., et al. “Evidence-based Discussion increases Childhood Vaccination uptake: A Randomised Cluster Controlled Trial of Knowledge Translation in Pakistan”. BMC International Health and Human Rights (2009): 9.
  35. Ansari MA., et al. “Reducing resistance against polio drops”. Journal of The Royal Society for the Promotion of Health6 (2007): 276-279.
  36. Banerjee A., et al. “Improving immunisation coverage in rural India: clustered randomised controlled evaluation of immunisation campaigns with and without incentives”. BMJ 340 (2010): 2220.
  37. Nasiru SG., et al. “Breaking Community Barriers to Polio Vaccination in Northern Nigeria: the impact of a Grass roots Mobilization Campaign (Majigi)”. Pathogen Glob Health 106 (2012): 166-171.
  38. Usman HR., et al. “Redesigned Immunization Card and Center-based Education to Reduce Childhood Immunization Dropouts in Urban Pakistan: A Randomized Controlled Trial”. Vaccine 3 (2009): 467-472.

Citation

Citation: Chandrashekhar BR., et al. “Vaccine Hesitancy- A Review of Literature". Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 6.3 (2022): 28-36.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Chandrashekhar BR., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.278

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is October 10, 2022.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US