Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ASDS)(ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 2

COVID‐19 Pandemic and Subsequent Demand for E-Learning: Insights of Students’ Perspective

Suzan S Ibrahim1, Radwa R Hussein2, Yasmine Fouad2 and Doaa Adel-Khattab2*

1Professor at Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology and Diagnosis, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
2Lecturer at Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology and Diagnosis, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

*Corresponding Author: Doaa Adel-Khattab, Lecturer at Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology and Diagnosis, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Received: December 16, 2021; Published: January 31, 2022

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic outbreak has restricted the ability to conduct in‐person learning which affected medical education. One of the most immediate changes introduced has been the broad cancelling of face-to-face and being replaced by E-learning.

Objectives: the purpose of this research is to evaluate undergraduate and postgraduate student educational experience and perception towards implementing online learning and assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Material and Methods: cross-sectional questionnaire-based analysis of the undergraduate and postgraduate student’s perceptions about online teaching and assessment methods in Faculty of Dentistry Ain Shams University consisted of twenty-three questions that assess teaching approaches and communication, the information and communication technologies (ICTs) efficiency in the online learning, online assessment (OLA) regarding its effectiveness, fairness, feasibility and time saving in comparison to paper-based exams.

Results: 768 dental students in Faculty of Dentistry Ain Shams University participated in this survey, divided into 487 undergraduate and 299 postgraduate students. Nearly half of the undergraduate and postgraduate students approved that online teaching improves the learning process, most of the participants undergraduate and postgraduate students agreed that using technology saves teachers and students’ time. Around 80% of undergraduate and postgraduate students agreed that online teaching increase the sense of creativity. Majority of the participants in both undergraduate (76%) and postgraduate students (81%) were satisfied with the motivation of learning regarding online assessment (OLA). The degree of satisfaction with OLA reflection of knowledge was 64.6% in undergraduate and 76.5% in postgraduate students.

Conclusion: Online teaching is an effective approach with a high demand to improve students’ participation, interaction and communication, online assessment is a fair method, time saving and motivates students to learn.

Keywords: E-Learning; Pandemic; ICTs; COVID-19; OLA

References

  1. Nicola M., et al. “The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus and COVID-19 pandemic: A review”. International Journal of Surgery S1743-9191.20 (2020): 30316-30322.
  2. Ferrel MN and Ryan J. “The Impact of COVID-19 on Medical Education”. Cureus3 (2020): e7492.
  3. Ruiz, Jorge G., et al. “The Impact of E-Learning in Medical Education”. Academic Medicine3 (2006): 207-212.
  4. Noah A Newman and Omar M Lattouf. “Coalition for Medical education-A Call to Action: A Proposition to Adapt Clinical Medical Education to Meet the Needs of Students and Other Healthcare Learners During COVID-19”. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 6 (2020): 1174-1175.
  5. McCann A. “Factors affecting the adoption of an e-assessment system”. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education7 (2010): 799-818.
  6. Wen M., et al. “Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers”. Innovations in Education and Teaching International1 (2006): 83-92.
  7. Australian Flexible Learning Framework. “E-assessment and the AQTF: Bridging the divide between practitioners and auditors”. Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relationsc. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. Retrieved from flexiblelearning.net.au (2010).
  8. Singer M., et al. “Competent teachers for the knowledge society - A new master program”. Buletinul1B (2010): 107-116.
  9. Weaver M. “Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses”. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education3 (2006): 379-394.
  10. Ridgway J., et al. “Literature review of e-assessment”. Report Future Lab Series (2006).
  11. Australian Flexible Learning Framework and National Quality Council (AFLFNQC). “E assessment guidelines for the VET sector”. Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra (2012).
  12. , et al. “Online learning based on essential concepts and formative assessment”. Journal of Engineering Education 101.2 (2012): 244-287.
  13. Vosylis R., et al. “Comparison of Internet-based versus paper-and-pencil administered assessment of positive development indicators in adolescents’ sample”. Psichologija 45 (2012): 7-21.
  14. Ridgway J., et al. “Literature review of e-assessment” Report 10. Future Lab Series (2006).
  15. McFarlane A. “Perspectives on the relationships between ICT and assessment”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17 (2001): 227-234.
  16. Litoiu N. “School evaluation: The role of educational e-portfolios in a lifelong learning society”. Buletinul1 (2009): 106-113.
  17. Attia MA. “Postgraduate students’ perceptions toward online assessment: The case of the faculty of education, Umm Al- Qura University”. International Perspectives on Education and Society 24 (2014): 151-173.
  18. World Health Organization. WHO Director General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID 19 (2020).
  19. Almarzooq ZI., et al. “Virtual Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Disruptive Technology in Graduate Medical Education. In Journal of the American College of Cardiology20 (2020): 2635-2638.
  20. Sandhu P and de Wolf M. “The impact of COVID-19 on the undergraduate medical curriculum”. In Medical Education Online1 (2020).
  21. Cook DA., et al. “Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Academic Medicine 5 (2010): 909-922.
  22. Cook DA and Triola MM. “What is the role of e-learning? Looking past the hype”. Medical Education9 (2014): 930-937.
  23. Foster JL and Syrdal HA. “Improvements to the E-Learning Environment: Meeting Student Needs”. Contemporary Issues in Education Research 1 (2011): 1.
  24. Abaidoo N and Arkorful V. “Adoption and Effective Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning in Higher institutions in Ghana”. In International Journal of Education and Research12 (2014).
  25. Smeets E. “Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education?” The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on the Teacher View project Ed Smeets KBA Nijmegen Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers and Education 44 (2005): 343-355.
  26. Oldenburg R and Marsch A. “Optimizing teledermatology visits for dermatology resident education during the COVID-19 pandemic”. In Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology6 (2020): e229.
  27. Reinholz M and French LE. “Medical education and care in dermatology during the SARS‐CoV2 pandemia: challenges and chances”. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology5 (2020): e214-e216.
  28. Rusli R., et al. “Student perception data on online learning using heutagogy approach in the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences of Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia”. Data in Brief 29 (2020): 105152.
  29. Epstein RM. “Assessment in medical education”. In M. Cox and D. M. Irby (Eds.), New England Journal of Medicine4 (2007): 387-396.
  30. Cantillon P., et al. “Using computers for assessment in medicine”. In British Medical Journal7466 (2004): 606-609.
  31. Walsh K. Point of View: “Online assessment in medical education-current trends and future directions”. Malawi Medical Journal2 (2015): 71.
  32. Lewiss RE., et al. “Point-of-Care ultrasound education”. In Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine1 (2014): 27-32.
  33. Masters G. “Assessment online: informing teaching and learning (2017).
  34. Educational Research and Reviews 5.8 (2010): 427-431.
  35. Rudestam K E and Schoenholtz-Read J. “The flourishing of adult online education: An overview”. In: Rudestam KE, Schoenholtz-Read J (Editors). Handbook of Online Learning.2010, 1st Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc (2010): 1-28.
  36. Charles M and Diana L. Beth Mott-Stenerson - Student Satisfaction in Web-enhanced, Page 1 “Student Satisfaction in Web-enhanced Learning Environments”. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies (2009).
  37. Christine Greenhow. “Ask the Expert: Online learning vs. classroom learning”. associate professor of educational technology in the College of Education, 2018 Recipient of MSU’s Teacher-Scholar Award, answers questions about online and classroom learning (2018).
  38. Green RA and Hughes DL. “Student outcomes associated with use of asynchronous on-line discussion forums in gross anatomy teaching”. Anatomical Sciences Education 6 (2013): 101-106.
  39. Garrison DR and Kanuka H. “Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education”. The Internet and Higher Education 7 (2004): 95-105.
  40. Joynes V and Fuller R. “Legitimisation, personalisation and maturation: Using the experiences of a compulsory mobile curriculum to reconceptualise mobile learning”. Medical Teacher 38 (2016): 621-627.

Citation

Citation: Susan Ibrahim., et al. “COVID-19 Pandemic and Subsequent Demand for E-Learning: Insights of Students’ Perspective”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 6.2 (2022): 123-134.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Doaa Adel-Khattab., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.278

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is July 10, 2022.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US