Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research ArticleVolume 5 Issue 10

3D Evaluation of Distalization of Maxillary First Permanent Molar Using Mini Implants: A Finite Element Study

Rajivi Kalpakuri1, Manish Pisarla2, Tejaswi Kala3*, Jadhav Sachin Kumar4, B Jaya Lakshmi5 and B Prashanth Kumar6

1Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Vydehi Institute of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

2Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Meghana Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Telangana, India

3Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Tirumala Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India

4Post Graduate Student, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India

5Assistant Professor, Oral Medicine and Radiology, Tirumala Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India

6Assistant Professor, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Tirumala Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India

*Corresponding Author: Tejaswi Kala, Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Tirumala Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India.

Received: July 06, 2021; Published: September 14, 2021

Citation: Tejaswi Kala., et al. “3D Evaluation of Distalization of Maxillary First Permanent Molar Using Mini Implants: A Finite Element Study". Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 5.9 (2021): 40-52.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to use FEM to analyze three dimensional movements of first permanent molar distalization using mini-implants.

Aim of the Study: The aim of the study was to analyze the FEM model of the maxilla which simulates the three dimensional movements of the first permanent molar after distalization using mini-implants.

Materials and Methods: In the present study, a 3D FEM model of right maxilla with an end on molar relation was created and was used to calculate the amount of distalization in three axes, when forces were applied on implant to distalize the molar.

Results: On buccal side, the molar showed mesial buccal rotation, intrusion with uncontrolled distal tipping on application of 150 gms, on application of 200 gms, the molar showed mesial buccal rotation, intrusion with uncontrolled distal tipping and extrusion of mesial cusps. On palatal side, the molar showed mesio palatal rotation, distal displacement, and intrusion of distal cusps and extrusion of mesial cusps which were the same on application of 150 and 200 gms of force, but the movements were more with the latter.

Interpretation and Conclusion: Buccal placement leads to distalization and unwanted tipping, whereas palatal placement shows more distalization and less tipping, as it is closer to center of resistance. In terms of visibility and ease of placement, buccal implant was easier compared to palatal implant.

Keywords: Mini-Implant; Distalization; Skeletal Anchorage

Bibliography

  1. Nanda R. “Esthetics and Biomechanics in Orthodontics”. 2nd St Louis, MO: Elsevier/Saunders (2015).
  2. Trakyali G., et al. “Conscious hypnosis as a method for patient motivation in cervical headgear wear-a pilot study”. European Journal of Orthodontics2 (2008): 147-152.
  3. Gianelly AA., et al. “Distalization of molars with repelling magnets”. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 22 (1988): 40-44.
  4. Gianelly A., et al. “Japanese NiTi coils used to move molars distally”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics6 (1991): 564-566.
  5. Bussick T and McNamara J. “Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics3 (2000): 333-343.
  6. Keles A. “Maxillary unilateral molar distalization with sliding mechanics: a preliminary investigation”. European Journal of Orthodontics5 (2001): 507-515.
  7. Bolla E., et al. “Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods”. The Angle Orthodontist 72 (2002): 481-494.
  8. Antonarakis G and Kiliaridis S. “Maxillary Molar Distalization with Noncompliance Intramaxillary Appliances in Class II Malocclusion”. The Angle Orthodontist6 (2008): 1133-1140.
  9. Fudalej P and Antoszewska J. “Are orthodontic distalizers reinforced with the temporary skeletal anchorage devices effective?” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics6 (2011): 722-729.
  10. Wilmes B and Drescher D. “A miniscrew system with interchangeable abutments”. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 42 (2008): 574-580.
  11. Karagkiolidou A., et al. “Survival of palatal miniscrews used for orthodontic appliance anchorage: A retrospective cohort study”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics6 (2013): 767-772.
  12. Baumgaertel S. “Quantitative investigation of palatal bone depth and cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement in adults”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics1 (2009): 104-108.
  13. Wilmes B., et al. “Insertion Angle Impact on Primary Stability of Orthodontic Mini-Implants”. The Angle Orthodontist6 (2008): 1065-1070.
  14. Hoste S., et al. “Risk factors and indications of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a literature review”. Australian Society of Orthodontists 24 (2008): 140-148.
  15. Costa A., et al. “Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report”. The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 13 (1998): 201-209.
  16. Choi J., et al. “Bone density measurement in interdental areas with simulated placement of orthodontic miniscrew implants”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics6 (2009): 766.e1-e12.
  17. Park H., et al. “Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics1 (2006): 18-25.
  18. Antoszewska J., et al. “Five-year experience with orthodontic miniscrew implants: A retrospective investigation of factors influencing success rates”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics2 (2009): 158.e1-e10.
  19. Lee N and Baek S. “Effects of the diameter and shape of orthodontic mini-implants on microdamage to the cortical bone”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics1 (2010): 8.e1-e8.
  20. Park H., et al. “Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics1 (2008): 30-37.
  21. Wilmes B., et al. “Parameters Affecting Primary Stability of Orthodontic Mini-implants”. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics3 (2006): 162-174.
  22. Veltri M., et al. “Soft bone primary stability of 3 different mini screws for orthodontic anchorage: A resonance frequency investigation”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 135 (2009): 642-648.
  23. Liou EJW., et al. “Do mini screws remain stationary under orthodontic forces?” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 126 (2004): 42-47.
  24. Celenza F and Hochman MN. “Absolute Anchorage in Orthodontics: Direct and Indirect Implant-Assisted Modalities”. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 34 (2000): 397-402.
  25. Kanomi R. “Mini-Implant for Orthodontic Anchorage”. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 31 (1997): 763-767.
  26. Serra G., et al. “Sequential bone healing of immediately loaded mini-implants”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 134 (2008): 44-52.
  27. Pierrisnard L., et al. “Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution”. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 5 (2003): 254-262.
  28. Deguchi T., et al. “Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 129 (2006): 721.e7-e12.
  29. Miyawaki S., et al. “Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 124 (2003): 373-378.
  30. Roberts WE., et al. “Rigid Implant Anchorage to close mandibular first molar extraction site”. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 28 (1994): 693-704.
  31. Kuroda S., et al. “Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 131 (2007): 7.
  32. Yettram AL., et al. “Centre of rotation of a maxillary central incisor under orthodontic loading”. British Journal of Orthodontics 4 (1977): 23-27.
  33. Natali AN., et al. “Experimental-numerical analysis of mini pig's multi-rooted teeth”. The Journal of Biomechanics 40 (2007): 1701-1708.
  34. Pickard MB., et al. “Effects of mini screw orientation on implant stability and resistance to failure”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 137 (2010): 91-99.
  35. Oyonarte R., et al. “Peri implant bone response to orthodontic loading: Part 1. A histomorphometric study of the effects of implant surface design”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 128 (2005): 173-181.
  36. Cacciafesta V., et al. “JCO Round Table: Skeletal Anchorage”. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 63 (2009): 303-317.
  37. Halazonetis DJ. “Computer experiments using a two-dimensional model of tooth support”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 109 (1996): 598-606.
  38. Chen F., et al. “Anchorage effect of various shape palatal osseointegrated implants: a finite element study”. The Angle Orthodontist 75 (2005): 378-385.
  39. Reynders R., et al. “Mini implants in orthodontics: A systematic review of the literature”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 135 (2009): 564-565.
  40. Zhao L., et al. “Effect of placement angle on the stability of loaded titanium micro screws: A microcomputed tomographic and biomechanical analysis”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 139 (2011): 628-635.
  41. Gedrange T., et al. “Three-dimensional analysis of endosseous palatal implants and bones after vertical, horizontal, and diagonal force application”. European Journal of Orthodontics 25 (2003): 109-115.
  42. Gelgor IE., et al. “Intraosseous Screw–Supported Upper Molar Distalization”. The Angle Orthodontist 74 (2004): 838-850.
  43. Sandler J., et al. “Palatal implants are a good alternative to headgear: A randomized trial”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 133 (2008): 51-57.
  44. Escobar SA., et al. “Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: A clinical study”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 131 (2007): 545-549.
  45. Oberti G., et al. “Maxillary molar distalization with the dual-force distalizer supported by mini-implants:A clinical study”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics3 (2009): 282-283.
  46. Ueno S., et al. “Analysis of force system for upper molar distalization using a trans-palatal arch and mini-implant: A finite element analysis”. European Journal of Orthodontics5 (2013): 628-633.
  47. Kaya B., et al. “Palatal implant versus zygomatic anchorage for distaliation of maxillary posterior teeth”. European Journal of Orthodontics4 (2013): 507-514.
  48. Nalcaci R., et al. “A reliable method for evaluating upper molar distalization: Superimposition of three- dimensional digital model”. The Korean Journal of Orthodontics2 (2015): 82-88.
  49. Mavropoulos A., et al. “Noncompliance unilateral maxillary molar distalization: a three-dimensional tooth movement analysis”. The Angle Orthodontist 76 (2006): 382-387.
  50. Bondemark L and Kurol J. “Distalization of maxillary first and second molars simultaneously with repelling magnets”. European Journal of Orthodontics 14 (1992): 264-272.
  51. Brickman CD., et al. “Evaluation of the jones jig appliance for distal molar movement”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 118 (2000): 526-534.
  52. Ashmore J., et al. “A 3-dimensional analysis of molar movement during headgear treatment”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics1 (2002): 18-29.
  53. Ludwig B., et al. “Application of a new viscoelastic finite element method model and analysis of miniscrew-supported hybrid hyrax treatment”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 143 (2013): 426-435.
  54. Mavropoulos A., et al. “Efficiency of noncompliance simultaneous first and second upper molar distalization: a three-dimensional tooth movement analysis”. The Angle Orthodontist 75 (2005): 532-539.
  55. Miresmaeili A., et al. “Three-dimensional analysis of the distal movement of maxillary 1st molars in patients fitted with mini-implants-aided trans-palatal arches”. The Korean Journal of Orthodontics Journal5 (2015): 236-244.
  56. Duran GS., et al. “Three-dimensional analysis of tooth movements after palatal miniscrew-supported molar distalization”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2150 (2016): 188-197.
  57. Yu I., et al. “Comparison of tooth displacement between buccal mini-implants and palatal plate anchorage for molar distalization: a finite element study”. European Journal of Orthodontics4 (2011): 394-402.
  58. Mohamadi A., et al. “Unilateral Molar Distalization with an Implant-Supported Appliance: A Case Report of a Promising Alternative to Traditional Distalization Techniques”. Iranian Journal of Orthodontics1 (2018): 8042.
  59. Razavi M. “Applications and Benefits of Fixed Anchorage in the Palate”. Orthodontic Perspectives2 (2009): 15-17.
  60. Fayed M., et al. “Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography”. The Angle Orthodontist5 (2010): 939-951.

Copyright: © 2021 Viorica Bulgaru., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is July 10, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US