1Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Vydehi Institute of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India 2Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Meghana Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Telangana, India 3Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Tirumala Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India 4Post Graduate Student, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India 5Assistant Professor, Oral Medicine and Radiology, Tirumala Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India 6Assistant Professor, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Tirumala Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India
*Corresponding Author: Tejaswi Kala, Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Tirumala Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India.
Received: July 06, 2021; Published: September 14, 2021
Citation: Tejaswi Kala., et al. “3D Evaluation of Distalization of Maxillary First Permanent Molar Using Mini Implants: A Finite Element Study". Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 5.9 (2021): 40-52.
Objectives: The purpose of the study was to use FEM to analyze three dimensional movements of first permanent molar distalization using mini-implants.
Aim of the Study: The aim of the study was to analyze the FEM model of the maxilla which simulates the three dimensional movements of the first permanent molar after distalization using mini-implants.
Materials and Methods: In the present study, a 3D FEM model of right maxilla with an end on molar relation was created and was used to calculate the amount of distalization in three axes, when forces were applied on implant to distalize the molar.
Results: On buccal side, the molar showed mesial buccal rotation, intrusion with uncontrolled distal tipping on application of 150 gms, on application of 200 gms, the molar showed mesial buccal rotation, intrusion with uncontrolled distal tipping and extrusion of mesial cusps. On palatal side, the molar showed mesio palatal rotation, distal displacement, and intrusion of distal cusps and extrusion of mesial cusps which were the same on application of 150 and 200 gms of force, but the movements were more with the latter.
Interpretation and Conclusion: Buccal placement leads to distalization and unwanted tipping, whereas palatal placement shows more distalization and less tipping, as it is closer to center of resistance. In terms of visibility and ease of placement, buccal implant was easier compared to palatal implant.
Keywords: Mini-Implant; Distalization; Skeletal Anchorage
Copyright: © 2021 Viorica Bulgaru., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
ff
© 2024 Acta Scientific, All rights reserved.