Arpit Sikri1*, SV Singh2, Jyotsana Sikri3 and Ruben Lobo4
1Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Santosh Dental College and Hospital, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, Delhi NCR, India
2Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics, Santosh Dental College and Hospital, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, Delhi NCR, India
3Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Santosh Dental College, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, Delhi NCR, India
4Head of Communications and Marketing, Dentist Channel Online Pvt Ltd, India
*Corresponding Author: Arpit Sikri, Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Santosh Dental College and Hospital, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, Delhi NCR, India.
Received: November 21, 2020; Published:November 30, 2020
Implants have been a gold standard treatment protocol for prosthetic rehabilitation in dental practices. Titanium and its alloys have ruled dental implantology since its initiation, harking back to the 1960s. As far as the clinical practice is concerned, many patients worry about the materials being exposed to their oral cavity and the effect this can have on their general wellbeing. While choosing dental implants, it is ideal to utilize the most un-receptive and least harmful material plausible. Throughout the long term, the pattern has been towards keeping away from the utilization of metals in our body. An elective material to titanium exists as ceramics explicitly zirconia for dental implants.
Citation: Arpit Sikri., et al. “Ceramic Implantology: Boon or Bane in Implant Dentistry?".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 5.1 (2021): 01-02.
Copyright: © 2021 Arpit Sikri., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
ff
© 2024 Acta Scientific, All rights reserved.